Suppr超能文献

加拿大安大略省传统笼养和地面平养蛋鸡龙骨骨折发生率及其他福利指标的农场比较。

On-farm comparison of keel fracture prevalence and other welfare indicators in conventional cage and floor-housed laying hens in Ontario, Canada.

作者信息

Petrik Mike T, Guerin Michele T, Widowski Tina M

机构信息

McKinley Hatchery, Inc. 65 Munroe Cres, Guelph, ON, N1G 5E4, Canada

Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1.

出版信息

Poult Sci. 2015 Apr;94(4):579-85. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev039. Epub 2015 Feb 22.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the flock-level prevalence of healed keel bone fractures and to benchmark other indicators of well-being in laying hens housed in conventional cages and single-tier floor housing systems at several points during the production period. Commercial farms in Ontario, Canada, that housed hens in cages (n=9) or floor barns (n=8) were included. Flocks were beak-trimmed brown hens of various strains. Each flock was visited at 20, 35, 50, and 65 wk of age. At each visit, 50 hens were weighed, palpated for healed keel fractures, and feather scored over 4 areas of the body. Data were collected from the farm records on cumulative mortality. Keel fracture prevalence was higher in floor-housed flocks compared to cage-housed flocks (48.3±0.04% vs. 24.8±0.03%; P<0.001). The majority of keel fractures occurred by 50 wk. Cumulative mortality tended to be higher in floor-housed flocks compared to cage-housed flocks (2.13±0.42% vs. 1.29±0.19%; P=0.078). Mean BW was lower (1,827±28.8 g vs. 1,888±26.8 g; P=0.02) yet more uniform (CV of BW 9.43±0.40% vs. 10.10±0.32%; P<0.001) in floor-housed flocks compared to cage-housed flocks. Feather condition was not affected by housing system type (P=0.618), although it declined with age (P<0.001). Individual hen factors assessed using Pearson partial correlations indicated that hens with fractures were heavier at 65 wk in both housing types (P<0.05) and that heavier hens housed on the floor had better feather scores (P<0.001) from 35 wk onward. Floor-housed hens with fractures had lower feather scores at 35 wk (P<0.05) but not at 50 or 65 wk. Housing hens in single-tier floor systems increased the flock-level prevalence of keel fractures and resulted in a lower, yet more uniform, BW compared to hens in conventional cages under commercial conditions in Ontario. Benchmarking welfare indicators from alternative housing systems for laying hens is important to ensure that progress is made in improving their well-being.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较愈合龙骨骨折的鸡群水平患病率,并在产蛋期的几个时间点对饲养在传统鸡笼和单层地面饲养系统中的蛋鸡的其他福利指标进行基准测试。纳入了加拿大安大略省将母鸡饲养在鸡笼(n = 9)或地面鸡舍(n = 8)中的商业农场。鸡群为各种品系的断喙褐壳蛋鸡。在20、35、50和65周龄时对每个鸡群进行走访。每次走访时,对50只母鸡称重,触诊检查愈合的龙骨骨折情况,并对身体4个部位的羽毛进行评分。从农场记录中收集累计死亡率数据。与笼养蛋鸡群相比,地面饲养蛋鸡群的龙骨骨折患病率更高(48.3±0.04%对24.8±0.03%;P<0.001)。大多数龙骨骨折发生在50周龄之前。与笼养蛋鸡群相比,地面饲养蛋鸡群的累计死亡率往往更高(2.13±0.42%对1.29±0.19%;P = 0.078)。与笼养蛋鸡群相比,地面饲养蛋鸡群的平均体重较低(1827±28.8克对1888±26.8克;P = 0.02),但体重更均匀(体重变异系数9.43±0.40%对10.10±0.32%;P<0.001)。羽毛状况不受饲养系统类型的影响(P = 0.618),尽管它随年龄下降(P<0.001)。使用Pearson偏相关分析评估的个体母鸡因素表明,两种饲养类型中骨折的母鸡在65周龄时体重更重(P<0.05),并且从35周龄起,地面饲养的较重母鸡羽毛评分更好(P<0.001)。35周龄时,地面饲养的骨折母鸡羽毛评分较低(P<0.05),但在50周龄或65周龄时并非如此。在安大略省的商业条件下,与传统鸡笼中的母鸡相比,将母鸡饲养在单层地面系统中会增加鸡群水平的龙骨骨折患病率,并导致体重较低但更均匀。对蛋鸡替代饲养系统的福利指标进行基准测试对于确保在改善其福利方面取得进展很重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验