• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

即使刺激物之间的距离太大而无法产生扫视平均效应,眼球运动仍会倾向于多个刺激物的中心。

Eye movements are primed toward the center of multiple stimuli even when the interstimulus distances are too large to generate saccade averaging.

作者信息

Christie John, Hilchey Matthew D, Mishra Ramesh, Klein Raymond M

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada,

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2015 May;233(5):1541-9. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4227-7. Epub 2015 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1007/s00221-015-4227-7
PMID:25716611
Abstract

Prior oculomotor research has established that saccades tend to land near the center of multiple saccade targets when they are near each other. This saccade averaging phenomenon (or global effect) has been ascribed to short-distance lateral excitation between neurons in the superior colliculus. Further, at greater inter-stimulus distances, eye movements tend toward the individual elements. This transition to control by local elements (individuation) with inter-stimulus distance has been attributed to long-range lateral inhibition between neurons in winner-take-all models of oculomotor behavior. We hypothesized that the traditional method of requiring a saccade to an array of multiple, simultaneous targets may entail response ambiguity that intensifies with distance. We resolved the ambiguity by focussing on reaction time of our human participants to a single saccade target after one or more simultaneous priming stimuli. At a 50-ms prime-target interval, saccadic reaction time was shortest for targets closer to the center of the prime stimuli independent of the distance between the primes. This effect was gone at 400 ms. These findings challenge the typical inferences about the neural control of oculomotor behavior that have been derived from the boundary between saccade averaging and individuation and provide a new method to explore eye movements with lessened impact from decision processes.

摘要

先前的动眼神经研究已经证实,当多个扫视目标彼此靠近时,扫视往往会落在这些目标的中心附近。这种扫视平均现象(或全局效应)被归因于上丘神经元之间的短距离侧向兴奋。此外,在更大的刺激间隔距离下,眼球运动倾向于朝向单个元素。随着刺激间隔距离的增加,这种向由局部元素控制(个体化)的转变已归因于动眼神经行为的胜者全得模型中神经元之间的长程侧向抑制。我们假设,要求对多个同时出现的目标阵列进行扫视的传统方法可能会导致反应模糊性,且这种模糊性会随着距离的增加而加剧。我们通过关注人类参与者在一个或多个同时出现的启动刺激后对单个扫视目标的反应时间来解决这种模糊性。在50毫秒的启动 - 目标间隔下,对于更靠近启动刺激中心的目标,扫视反应时间最短,与启动刺激之间的距离无关。在400毫秒时这种效应消失了。这些发现挑战了从扫视平均和个体化边界得出的关于动眼神经行为神经控制的典型推论,并提供了一种新方法来探索眼球运动,减少决策过程的影响。

相似文献

1
Eye movements are primed toward the center of multiple stimuli even when the interstimulus distances are too large to generate saccade averaging.即使刺激物之间的距离太大而无法产生扫视平均效应,眼球运动仍会倾向于多个刺激物的中心。
Exp Brain Res. 2015 May;233(5):1541-9. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4227-7. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
2
Timing of concurrent visual stimuli determines modulation of saccadic amplitude.同时呈现视觉刺激的时间决定眼跳幅度的调节。
J Vis. 2018 Oct 1;18(11):8. doi: 10.1167/18.11.8.
3
The time course of top-down control on saccade averaging.扫视平均中自上而下控制的时间进程。
Vision Res. 2014 Jul;100:29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.03.007. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
4
A model of the saccade-generating system that accounts for trajectory variations produced by competing visual stimuli.一种扫视生成系统模型,该模型解释了由竞争性视觉刺激产生的轨迹变化。
Biol Cybern. 2005 Jan;92(1):21-37. doi: 10.1007/s00422-004-0526-y. Epub 2004 Dec 10.
5
How global is the global effect? The spatial characteristics of saccade averaging.全局效应的范围有多广?扫视平均的空间特征。
Vision Res. 2013 May 24;84:6-15. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
6
Characterization of oculomotor and visual activities in the primate pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus during visually guided saccade tasks.在灵长类动眼神经核被盖脚桥核中对视觉引导的眼球跳动任务中的眼球运动和视觉活动进行特征描述。
Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Dec 3;30(11):2211-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.07009.x. Epub 2009 Nov 25.
7
Competitive integration of visual and goal-related signals on neuronal accumulation rate: a correlate of oculomotor capture in the superior colliculus.视觉和目标相关信号在神经元积累率上的竞争整合:上丘眼球追踪捕获的相关物。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Oct;25(10):1754-68. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00429. Epub 2013 May 22.
8
Linking express saccade occurance to stimulus properties and sensorimotor integration in the superior colliculus.将快速扫视的发生与上丘中的刺激特性和感觉运动整合联系起来。
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Aug;114(2):879-92. doi: 10.1152/jn.00047.2015. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
9
Global saccadic adaptation.全局扫视适应
Vision Res. 2010 Aug 23;50(18):1882-90. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.06.010. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
10
Evidence for interactions between target selection and visual fixation for saccade generation in humans.人类扫视生成中目标选择与视觉注视之间相互作用的证据。
Exp Brain Res. 1995;103(1):168-73. doi: 10.1007/BF00241974.

引用本文的文献

1
The who and the where: Attention to identities and locations in groups.人群中的“谁”和“哪里”:关注群体中的身份和位置。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jul;86(5):1816-1832. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02879-6. Epub 2024 May 9.
2
What Neuroscientific Studies Tell Us about Inhibition of Return.神经科学研究关于返回抑制告诉了我们什么。
Vision (Basel). 2019 Oct 29;3(4):58. doi: 10.3390/vision3040058.
3
Out with the new, in with the old: Exogenous orienting to locations with physically constant stimulation.旧的不去,新的不来:对具有物理恒定性刺激的位置进行外部定向。

本文引用的文献

1
Returning to "inhibition of return" by dissociating long-term oculomotor IOR from short-term sensory adaptation and other nonoculomotor "inhibitory" cueing effects.通过将长期动眼抑制性返回与短期感觉适应及其他非动眼“抑制性”提示效应相分离,来回归到“抑制性返回”。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Aug;40(4):1603-16. doi: 10.1037/a0036859. Epub 2014 May 12.
2
Inhibition of return is at the midpoint of simultaneous cues.返回抑制位于同时出现的线索的中点。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Nov;75(8):1610-8. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0510-5.
3
Inhibition of return in the archer fish.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Aug;25(4):1331-1336. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1426-1.
4
Automatic and intentional influences on saccade landing.对扫视落点的自动和有意影响。
J Neurophysiol. 2017 Aug 1;118(2):1105-1122. doi: 10.1152/jn.00141.2017. Epub 2017 May 24.
射箭鱼的返回抑制。
Nat Commun. 2013;4:1657. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2644.
4
How global is the global effect? The spatial characteristics of saccade averaging.全局效应的范围有多广?扫视平均的空间特征。
Vision Res. 2013 May 24;84:6-15. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
5
Averaging is not everything: the saccade global effect weakens with increasing stimulus size.平均并非一切:随着刺激大小增加,扫视全局效应会减弱。
Vision Res. 2012 Jun 1;62:108-15. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.04.003. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
6
Lateral interactions in the superior colliculus produce saccade deviation in a neural field model.上丘中的横向相互作用在神经场模型中产生扫视偏差。
Vision Res. 2012 Jun 1;62:66-74. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.03.024. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
7
Spatial interactions in the superior colliculus predict saccade behavior in a neural field model.上丘的空间相互作用预测神经场模型中的眼球运动行为。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Feb;24(2):315-36. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00139. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
8
A global effect of capture saccades.捕捉眼跳的全局效应。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Apr;210(1):57-65. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2602-6. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
9
Modeling inhibition of return as short-term depression of early sensory input to the superior colliculus.将返回抑制建模为上丘早期感觉输入的短期抑制。
Vision Res. 2011 May 11;51(9):987-96. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.02.013. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
10
Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Evidence for facilitatory and inhibitory processes.词汇记忆中的语义启动和提取:促进和抑制过程的证据。
Mem Cognit. 1976 Sep;4(5):648-54. doi: 10.3758/BF03213230.