Jeong Jae Seung, Kang Min Gu, Kim Chan Yun, Kim Na Rae
*Department of Ophthalmology and Inha Vision Science Laboratory, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon †Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Vision Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J Glaucoma. 2015 Oct-Nov;24(8):583-90. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000231.
To elucidate patterns of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) defects by Cirrus optical coherence tomography (OCT) and examine the spatial relationship between GCIPL defect and visual field (VF) defect patterns.
A total of 116 eyes of 116 normal subjects and 111 eyes of 111 glaucoma patients were included. The 227 study subjects underwent Cirrus OCT imaging in macular cube mode and reliable standard VF testing. Two ophthalmologists blindly classified GCIPL defect patterns and VF defects. The frequency distribution of GCIPL defect patterns and spatial relationships between GCIPL defects and VF defects were investigated.
GCIPL defect patterns were classified as minimal, inner, outer, diffuse mild, diffuse severe, inferior confined, inferior dominant, superior confined, and superior dominant defects in normal controls (71.6%, 7.8%, 4.3%, 1.7%, 0%, 10.3%, 1.7%, 1.7%, and 0.9%, respectively) and in glaucoma patients (11.7%, 3.6%, 4.5%, 7.2%, 21.6%, 22.5%, 18.0%, 4.5%, and 6.3%, respectively). In mild and moderate glaucoma patients, the inferior confined type was most frequent (21.9% and 50.0%, respectively). However, the diffuse severe type was most frequent (59.1%) in advanced glaucoma patients. The locations of the VF defects corresponded to the locations of the GCIPL defects in glaucoma patients (P=0.012).
Glaucomatous damage of the macula was common and more frequent in the inferior retina. GCIPL defect patterns as determined by SD-OCT imaging corresponded well with central VF defects. It seems macular GCIPL analysis may be useful for evaluating glaucomatous optic neuropathy.
通过Cirrus光学相干断层扫描(OCT)阐明黄斑神经节细胞-内丛状层(GCIPL)缺损的模式,并研究GCIPL缺损与视野(VF)缺损模式之间的空间关系。
纳入116例正常受试者的116只眼和111例青光眼患者的111只眼。227名研究对象接受了黄斑立方模式的Cirrus OCT成像和可靠的标准VF检测。两名眼科医生对GCIPL缺损模式和VF缺损进行了盲法分类。研究了GCIPL缺损模式的频率分布以及GCIPL缺损与VF缺损之间的空间关系。
在正常对照组中,GCIPL缺损模式分为最小缺损、内侧缺损、外侧缺损、弥漫性轻度缺损、弥漫性重度缺损、下方局限性缺损、下方优势性缺损、上方局限性缺损和上方优势性缺损(分别为71.6%、7.8%、4.3%、1.7%、0%、10.3%、1.7%、1.7%和0.9%),在青光眼患者中分别为11.7%、3.6%、4.5%、7.2%、21.6%、22.5%、18.0%、4.5%和6.3%。在轻度和中度青光眼患者中,下方局限性类型最为常见(分别为21.9%和50.0%)。然而,在晚期青光眼患者中,弥漫性重度类型最为常见(59.1%)。青光眼患者的VF缺损位置与GCIPL缺损位置相对应(P = 0.012)。
黄斑部青光眼性损害常见,且在下视网膜更为频繁。SD-OCT成像确定的GCIPL缺损模式与中心VF缺损高度相符。黄斑GCIPL分析似乎有助于评估青光眼性视神经病变。