Wang Diane L, Raza Ali S, de Moraes Carlos Gustavo, Chen Monica, Alhadeff Paula, Jarukatsetphorn Ravivarn, Ritch Robert, Hood Donald C
Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA ; Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2015 Nov 30;4(6):4. doi: 10.1167/tvst.4.6.4. eCollection 2015 Nov.
To assess the extent to which glaucomatous damage of the macula can be detected using the summary statistics of a commercial report based upon the circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (cpRNFL) thickness obtained with frequency domain optical coherence tomography (fdOCT).
One hundred forty-three eyes of 143 open-angle glaucoma patients and suspects (56.4 ± 13.8 years) had 10-2 visual fields (VFs) and fdOCT macular and disc cube scans. RNFL and retinal ganglion cell plus inner plexiform layer thickness and probability maps were generated and combined with 10-2 VF information in a single-page, custom report previously described. Three graders evaluated these reports and classified each eye as "abnormal macula" or "normal macula." Commercially available fdOCT reports for cpRNFL thickness were generated using the automatic segmentation algorithm and norms from the machine. The ability of the reports to detect macular damage was analyzed in three ways: temporal quadrant (TQ) < 5%; TQ < 5% or clock hour 7 < 1% (TQ + CH7); and clock hours 7 through 10 with two sectors < 5% or one sector < 1% (CH7-10).
Sixty-one (43%) eyes were classified "abnormal macula" and 41 (29%) as "normal macula"; the 10-2 VFs and OCT probability maps did not agree in the remaining eyes. Of the 61 abnormal eyes, the TQ criterion missed 47 (77%); TQ + CH7 missed 24 (39%); and CH7-10 missed 22 (36%).
Conventional cpRNFL analyses on commercial OCT reports can miss macular (central field) damage.
To detect glaucomatous damage of the macula, additional tests, such as macular cube scans and/or 10-2 VFs, should be performed.
使用基于频域光学相干断层扫描(fdOCT)获得的视乳头周围视网膜神经纤维层(cpRNFL)厚度的商业报告的汇总统计数据,评估检测黄斑部青光眼性损害的程度。
143例开角型青光眼患者及疑似患者(年龄56.4±13.8岁)的143只眼睛进行了10-2视野(VF)检查以及fdOCT黄斑和视盘立方体扫描。生成视网膜神经纤维层和视网膜神经节细胞加内丛状层厚度及概率图,并与之前描述的单页定制报告中的10-2视野信息相结合。三名分级者评估这些报告,并将每只眼睛分类为“黄斑异常”或“黄斑正常”。使用机器的自动分割算法和标准生成cpRNFL厚度的商用fdOCT报告。通过三种方式分析报告检测黄斑损害的能力:颞侧象限(TQ)<5%;TQ<5%或钟点7<1%(TQ+CH7);以及钟点7至10有两个扇区<5%或一个扇区<1%(CH7-10)。
61只(43%)眼睛被分类为“黄斑异常”,41只(29%)为“黄斑正常”;其余眼睛的10-2视野和OCT概率图不一致。在61只异常眼睛中,TQ标准漏诊47只(77%);TQ+CH7漏诊24只(39%);CH7-10漏诊22只(36%)。
商用OCT报告上的传统cpRNFL分析可能会漏诊黄斑(中心视野)损害。
为检测黄斑部青光眼性损害,应进行额外检查,如黄斑立方体扫描和/或10-2视野检查。