Oomkens Rosanne, Hoogenboom Marcel, Knijn Trudie
Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Health Soc Care Community. 2016 Jul;24(4):399-410. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12218. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
Our aim was to improve the understanding of the relationships between performance-based contracting, management supportiveness and professionalism in home care. Using path analysis, this article explores the relationships between home-care workers' perceptions of management support, implementation of performance-based contracting (i.e. use of strict time registration rules and cost-efficiency measures) and autonomy and intrinsic job satisfaction. We hypothesised that: use of strict time registration rules and cost-efficiency measures relates to lower levels of autonomy and intrinsic job satisfaction (H1); there is an indirect relationship between use of strict time registration rules and use of cost-efficiency measures and intrinsic job satisfaction via autonomy (H2); higher levels of management support relate to the use of looser time registration rules and less use of cost-efficiency measures (H3); and higher levels of management support relate to higher levels of autonomy and intrinsic job satisfaction (H4). We used data from a cross-sectional survey conducted in 2010 of a sample of Dutch home-care workers (N = 156, response rate = 34%). Overall, our study suggests that the consequences of performance-based contracting for professionalism are ambiguous. More specifically, using strict time registration rules is related to lower levels of autonomy, whereas using cost-efficiency measures does not seem to affect autonomy (H1). Performance-based contracting has no consequences for the level of fulfilment home-care workers find in their job, as neither of the two contracting dimensions measured was directly or indirectly related to intrinsic job satisfaction (H1, H2). The role of managers must be taken into account when studying performance-based contracting, because perceived higher management support is related to managers' less frequent use of both strict time registration rules and of cost-efficiency measures (H3). The insight we gained into the importance of supportive managers for both autonomy and job satisfaction (H4) can help home-care organisations improve the attractiveness of home-care work.
我们的目标是增进对居家护理中基于绩效的合同、管理支持度和专业精神之间关系的理解。本文运用路径分析,探讨了居家护理工作者对管理支持的认知、基于绩效的合同实施情况(即严格的时间登记规则和成本效益措施的使用)与自主性及内在工作满意度之间的关系。我们假设:严格的时间登记规则和成本效益措施的使用与较低水平的自主性和内在工作满意度相关(假设1);严格的时间登记规则和成本效益措施的使用与通过自主性产生的内在工作满意度之间存在间接关系(假设2);更高水平的管理支持与较宽松的时间登记规则的使用以及成本效益措施的较少使用相关(假设3);更高水平的管理支持与更高水平的自主性和内在工作满意度相关(假设4)。我们使用了2010年对荷兰居家护理工作者样本进行的横断面调查数据(N = 156,回复率 = 34%)。总体而言,我们的研究表明,基于绩效的合同对专业精神的影响是模糊的。更具体地说,使用严格的时间登记规则与较低水平的自主性相关,而使用成本效益措施似乎并不影响自主性(假设1)。基于绩效的合同对居家护理工作者在工作中获得的满足感水平没有影响,因为所衡量的两个合同维度均与内在工作满意度没有直接或间接关系(假设1、假设2)。在研究基于绩效的合同时,必须考虑管理者的作用,因为感知到的更高管理支持与管理者较少频繁使用严格的时间登记规则和成本效益措施相关(假设3)。我们对支持性管理者对自主性和工作满意度的重要性的洞察(假设4)可以帮助居家护理组织提高居家护理工作的吸引力。