Rosenfeld J Peter, Ward Anne, Frigo Vincent, Drapekin Jesse, Labkovsky Elena
Department of Psychology, Institute for Neuroscience, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2015 Apr;96(1):16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.02.026. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
One group of participants received a series of city name stimuli presented on trials of the Complex Trial Protocol (CTP) version of a P300-based, concealed information test (CIT). Stimuli were presented on alternating trials in either auditory or visual presentation modality. In 1/7 of the trials the participant's home town (probe) repeatedly appeared in a series of 6 other (irrelevant) repeated city names. In both modalities, probe stimuli produced larger P300s than irrelevant stimuli. Visual stimuli produced shorter behavioral reaction times and P300 latencies, as well as larger P300 probe amplitudes, probe-irrelevant amplitude differences, and individual diagnostic accuracies than the same stimuli presented in the auditory modality. Possible reasons for these effects are discussed, and subject to discussed limitations, the applied conclusion reached is that in all CITs, visual presentation of stimuli, if feasible, should be preferentially used.
一组参与者在基于P300的隐蔽信息测试(CIT)的复杂试验方案(CTP)版本的试验中接受了一系列城市名称刺激。刺激以听觉或视觉呈现方式交替出现在试验中。在1/7的试验中,参与者的家乡(探测刺激)在一系列其他6个(无关的)重复城市名称中反复出现。在两种呈现方式中,探测刺激产生的P300比无关刺激更大。与以听觉方式呈现的相同刺激相比,视觉刺激产生的行为反应时间和P300潜伏期更短,以及更大的P300探测波幅、探测-无关波幅差异和个体诊断准确率。讨论了这些效应的可能原因,并在讨论的局限性范围内,得出的应用结论是,在所有CIT中,如果可行,应优先使用视觉呈现刺激。