Suppr超能文献

在基于P300的复杂试验方案中,用于隐蔽自传体记忆检测的视觉(言语)与听觉测试呈现方式的优越性证据。

Evidence suggesting superiority of visual (verbal) vs. auditory test presentation modality in the P300-based, Complex Trial Protocol for concealed autobiographical memory detection.

作者信息

Rosenfeld J Peter, Ward Anne, Frigo Vincent, Drapekin Jesse, Labkovsky Elena

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Institute for Neuroscience, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.

出版信息

Int J Psychophysiol. 2015 Apr;96(1):16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.02.026. Epub 2015 Feb 26.

Abstract

One group of participants received a series of city name stimuli presented on trials of the Complex Trial Protocol (CTP) version of a P300-based, concealed information test (CIT). Stimuli were presented on alternating trials in either auditory or visual presentation modality. In 1/7 of the trials the participant's home town (probe) repeatedly appeared in a series of 6 other (irrelevant) repeated city names. In both modalities, probe stimuli produced larger P300s than irrelevant stimuli. Visual stimuli produced shorter behavioral reaction times and P300 latencies, as well as larger P300 probe amplitudes, probe-irrelevant amplitude differences, and individual diagnostic accuracies than the same stimuli presented in the auditory modality. Possible reasons for these effects are discussed, and subject to discussed limitations, the applied conclusion reached is that in all CITs, visual presentation of stimuli, if feasible, should be preferentially used.

摘要

一组参与者在基于P300的隐蔽信息测试(CIT)的复杂试验方案(CTP)版本的试验中接受了一系列城市名称刺激。刺激以听觉或视觉呈现方式交替出现在试验中。在1/7的试验中,参与者的家乡(探测刺激)在一系列其他6个(无关的)重复城市名称中反复出现。在两种呈现方式中,探测刺激产生的P300比无关刺激更大。与以听觉方式呈现的相同刺激相比,视觉刺激产生的行为反应时间和P300潜伏期更短,以及更大的P300探测波幅、探测-无关波幅差异和个体诊断准确率。讨论了这些效应的可能原因,并在讨论的局限性范围内,得出的应用结论是,在所有CIT中,如果可行,应优先使用视觉呈现刺激。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验