Trevino Kelly M, McConnell Timothy R
Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, New York (Dr Trevino); and Bloomsburg University, Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania, and Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania (Dr McConnell).
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2015 Jul-Aug;35(4):246-54. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000110.
This study is a longitudinal evaluation of religiosity/spirituality (R/S) and religious coping in post-myocardial infarction and post-coronary artery bypass surgery patients during a 12-week cardiac rehabilitation program. This study examines change in R/S and the relationship between R/S and psychosocial outcomes and exercise capacity over time.
Cardiac rehabilitation patients (N = 105) completed measures of R/S, religious coping, quality of life (QOL), self-efficacy (SE), and energy expenditure (EE) at the beginning (baseline) and end of a 12-week program. Relationships between R/S and religious coping and QOL, SE, and EE were evaluated.
A negative relationship emerged between baseline measures of R/S and religious coping and QOL, SE, and EE. There were significant increases in Good Deeds Coping, QOL, SE, and EE from baseline to end of program (Ps < .05). Baseline measures of Interpersonal Religious Support Coping were positively correlated with the change in EE from baseline to end (r = 0.21; P = .059), and there were positive correlations between the change in Experiential Religiosity (r = 0.32; P = .004) and Overall Religiosity (r = 0.25; P = .024) with the change in EE.
The demonstrated relationships between R/S and Religious Coping and outcomes in cardiac patients provide compelling support for the development of spiritual care interventions for cardiac patients and evaluation of the impact of these interventions on physiological, medical, and psychological outcomes in these patients.
本研究是对心肌梗死后和冠状动脉搭桥手术后患者在为期12周的心脏康复计划期间的宗教信仰/精神性(R/S)和宗教应对方式进行纵向评估。本研究考察R/S的变化以及R/S与心理社会结果和运动能力随时间的关系。
心脏康复患者(N = 105)在12周计划开始时(基线)和结束时完成了R/S、宗教应对方式、生活质量(QOL)、自我效能感(SE)和能量消耗(EE)的测量。评估了R/S与宗教应对方式以及QOL、SE和EE之间的关系。
R/S和宗教应对方式的基线测量值与QOL、SE和EE之间呈现负相关关系。从基线到计划结束时,善举应对、QOL、SE和EE均有显著增加(P <.05)。人际宗教支持应对的基线测量值与从基线到结束时EE的变化呈正相关(r = 0.21;P =.059),体验性宗教信仰的变化(r = 0.32;P =.004)和总体宗教信仰的变化(r = 0.25;P =.024)与EE的变化呈正相关。
R/S与宗教应对方式以及心脏病患者的结果之间已证明的关系,为开发针对心脏病患者的精神护理干预措施以及评估这些干预措施对这些患者生理、医学和心理结果的影响提供了有力支持。