Anthias C, van Walraven S M, Sørensen B S, de Faveri G N, Fechter M, Cornish J, Bacigalupo A, Müller C, Boo M, Shaw B E
Anthony Nolan Research Institute, UCL Cancer Centre, London, UK.
Europdonor Foundation, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015 May;50(5):637-41. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2015.15. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
In almost half of allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) transplants, a related donor (RD) is used, yet a lack of standardized guidelines means that their care is heterogeneous. Changes to regulatory standards aim to improve uniformity, but adherence to these regulations can prove logistically difficult for the transplant centers (TCs) managing RDs. Discussion has ensued around possible alternative models of related donor care and a session at the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) annual meeting in 2013 debated the question of whether a role exists for unrelated donor registries in the management of 'related' donors. In this overview, we discuss the issues raised at this debate and the pros and cons of donor registry involvement in various aspects of RD management. By examining existing models of related donor care that have been adopted by members of the World Marrow Donor Association (WMDA), we look for ways to enhance and homogenize RD care, while also enabling transplant centers to meet standards required for mandatory accreditation.
在几乎一半的异基因造血祖细胞(HPC)移植中,会使用相关供者(RD),然而缺乏标准化指南意味着对他们的护理是不一致的。监管标准的改变旨在提高一致性,但对于管理相关供者的移植中心(TC)而言,遵守这些规定在后勤方面可能存在困难。围绕相关供者护理的可能替代模式展开了讨论,并且在2013年欧洲血液与骨髓移植学会(EBMT)年会上的一场会议辩论了无关供者登记处是否在“相关”供者管理中发挥作用的问题。在本综述中,我们讨论了此次辩论中提出的问题以及供者登记处参与相关供者管理各方面的利弊。通过研究世界骨髓供者协会(WMDA)成员所采用的现有相关供者护理模式,我们寻找方法来加强和统一相关供者护理,同时也使移植中心能够达到强制认证所需的标准。