Bianco S
Recenti Prog Med. 1989 Jul-Aug;80(7-8):383-92.
The main feature in asthma is bronchial eosinophilic inflammation, induced, in genetically predisposed subjects, by known (aeroallergens, viral infection, occupational agents) and unknown agents. Inflammation critically increases bronchial responsiveness so that even rather mild stimuli (exercise, cold air, mist, allergens) are able to induce obstructive reactions. When preventive measures (specific immunotherapy, avoidance of inflammatory and precipitating factors) are inadequate, a pharmacological treatment is necessary. This should, in addition relieve bronchospasm, neutralize precipitating factors and reduce inflammation. In the first case bronchospasmolytic antireactive agents (beta 2-stimulants, antimuscarinic agents, theophyllines) should be used, whereas, in the second case, the first choice drugs are corticosteroids. Chromon derivatives can also be considered for both their antireactive and antiflogistic effects. It is impossible to elaborate rigid therapeutic schemes. Therapy must be individualized on the basis of symptoms, objective physical signs and functional data. Drugs, except theophylline (for which slow release oral formulations are preferred), should be preferably administered by inhalation. For patients who cannot properly master the use of metered dose inhalers, spacer devices or dry powder inhalers are indicated. Whereas mild asthmatic forms can be treated without corticosteroids, these are absolutely necessary when bronchospasmolytics and chromon derivatives, although appropriately used, do not provide a satisfactory control of the asthmatic syndrome. Many other drugs are now under study (antileukotrienes, anti-PAF, anti-5-lipoxygenase, anti-phospholipase A2), but the results published so far do not seem very promising. Anti-histamines, calcium antagonists, alpha-blocking drugs are justified only in some circumstances. The antireactive activity of loop diuretics is interesting, but its real therapeutic value is still to be assessed. Antibiotics are only needed in the (rare) cases of worsening of asthmatic symptoms due to infective sensitive agents.
哮喘的主要特征是支气管嗜酸性粒细胞炎症,在遗传易感性个体中,由已知因素(空气过敏原、病毒感染、职业因素)和未知因素诱发。炎症会显著增加支气管反应性,以至于即使是相当轻微的刺激(运动、冷空气、雾气、过敏原)也能够诱发阻塞性反应。当预防措施(特异性免疫疗法、避免炎症和诱发因素)不足时,就需要进行药物治疗。这种治疗除了应缓解支气管痉挛、中和诱发因素并减轻炎症外,在第一种情况下应使用支气管解痉抗反应药物(β2激动剂、抗毒蕈碱药物、茶碱类),而在第二种情况下,首选药物是皮质类固醇。色酮衍生物因其抗反应和抗炎作用也可被考虑使用。制定严格的治疗方案是不可能的。治疗必须根据症状、客观体征和功能数据进行个体化。除了茶碱(缓释口服制剂更佳)外,药物最好通过吸入给药。对于不能正确掌握定量吸入器使用方法的患者,建议使用储物罐装置或干粉吸入器。轻度哮喘形式可不使用皮质类固醇进行治疗,但当支气管解痉剂和色酮衍生物虽然使用得当但仍不能令人满意地控制哮喘综合征时,皮质类固醇则绝对必要。目前许多其他药物正在研究中(抗白三烯药、抗血小板活化因子药、抗5-脂氧合酶药、抗磷脂酶A2药),但迄今为止发表的结果似乎不太乐观。抗组胺药、钙拮抗剂、α受体阻滞剂仅在某些情况下适用。袢利尿剂的抗反应活性令人关注,但其真正的治疗价值仍有待评估。仅在因感染性敏感因素导致哮喘症状恶化的(罕见)情况下才需要使用抗生素。