Beydon Nicole, Chambellan Arnaud, Alberti Corinne, de Blic Jacques, Clément Annick, Escudier Estelle, Le Bourgeois Muriel
APHP, Unité Fonctionnelle de Physiologie-Explorations Fonctionnelles Respiratoires, Hôpital Armand-Trousseau, Paris, France.
INSERM U938, Centre de Recherche Saint Antoine, Paris, France.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2015 Dec;50(12):1374-82. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23167. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
To promote early screening of patients with suspected Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia (PCD), nasal nitric oxide (nNO) measurements during tidal breathing (TB) have been developed for children unable to ensure velum closure (VC) during breath hold or expiration against resistance. To investigate technical and practical issues related to TB-nNO methods in children referred for suspected or asserted PCD, we recorded, in a prospective multicenter study, TB-nNO (calculated as the mean of 5 peaks, 10 or 30 sec during tidal breathing) and VC-nNO when available. We studied 142 children (PCD diagnosis asserted in 47, excluded in 39). Nasal NO values were significantly different according to methods, VC-nNO being higher than TB-nNO (TB-nNO 5 peaks higher than mean of 10 or 30 sec). Specificity (90-94%) and sensitivity (86-97%) were similar between TB-nNO and VC-nNO methods. Age was more correlated with VC-nNO than with TB-nNO. TB-nNO could differ between the two nostrils by more than 10% (or 10 ppb when nNO absolute value lower 100 ppb) in 32-43% of the tested children, according to the different tidal breathing values, and was reproducible in the long term but influenced by ambient NO. Despite TB-nNO values being lower than VC-nNO, TB-nNO was found to be as discriminant for PCD, and probably more discriminant in children less than 8 years old, as the VC method. These results were obtained using the chemiluminescence technique which allows an easier assessment of relevant factors such as nasal permeability and ambient NO than the electrochemical technique.
为促进原发性纤毛运动障碍(PCD)疑似患者的早期筛查,已开发出用于无法在屏气或呼气对抗阻力时确保软腭闭合(VC)的儿童在潮气呼吸(TB)期间测量鼻一氧化氮(nNO)的方法。为调查与疑似或确诊PCD儿童的TB-nNO方法相关的技术和实际问题,我们在一项前瞻性多中心研究中记录了TB-nNO(计算为潮气呼吸期间5个峰值、10秒或30秒的平均值)和可用时的VC-nNO。我们研究了142名儿童(47名确诊为PCD,39名排除)。根据测量方法,鼻一氧化氮值有显著差异,VC-nNO高于TB-nNO(TB-nNO的5个峰值高于10秒或30秒的平均值)。TB-nNO和VC-nNO方法之间的特异性(90-94%)和敏感性(86-97%)相似。年龄与VC-nNO的相关性高于与TB-nNO的相关性。根据不同的潮气呼吸值,在32-43%的受试儿童中,两个鼻孔之间的TB-nNO差异可能超过10%(当nNO绝对值低于100 ppb时为10 ppb),并且TB-nNO在长期内具有可重复性,但受环境一氧化氮的影响。尽管TB-nNO值低于VC-nNO,但发现TB-nNO对PCD的判别能力与VC方法相同,在8岁以下儿童中可能更具判别能力。这些结果是使用化学发光技术获得的,与电化学技术相比,该技术更容易评估诸如鼻通透性和环境一氧化氮等相关因素。