Johannessen Håkon A, Gravseth Hans Magne, Sterud Tom
National Institute of Occupational Health, Oslo, Norway.
Am J Ind Med. 2015 May;58(5):561-7. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22431. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
We examined the effects of psychosocial stressors at work on subsequent injuries, taking into account organizational and mechanical working conditions.
Randomly drawn from the general population, the cohort comprised respondents with an active employee relationship in 2006 and 2009 (n = 6,745).
"Have you, over the past 12 months, afflicted injuries that were caused by an accident at work, and resulting in time off work after the day of the accident?".
High job strain (Odds ratio [OR] 2.31; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-4.57), high role conflict (OR 3.01; 95% CI 1.70-5.31), and high emotional demands (OR 1.96; 95% CI 1.15-3.35) predicted injury at follow up (P < 0.01). The population risk attributable to each of these factors ranged from 11% to 14%.
Excess risk of occupational injuries was attributable to job strain, role conflict, and emotional demands. These factors are potentially amenable to preventive measures.
我们研究了工作中的心理社会压力源对后续受伤情况的影响,并考虑了组织和机械工作条件。
该队列从一般人群中随机抽取,包括2006年和2009年有在职员工关系的受访者(n = 6745)。
“在过去12个月里,你是否因工作事故受伤,且事故发生当天之后需要请假?”
高工作压力(优势比[OR] 2.31;95%置信区间[CI] 1.16 - 4.57)、高角色冲突(OR 3.01;95% CI 1.70 - 5.31)和高情感需求(OR 1.96;95% CI 1.15 - 3.35)预测随访时会受伤(P < 0.01)。这些因素中每个因素导致的人群归因风险在11%至14%之间。
职业伤害的额外风险归因于工作压力、角色冲突和情感需求。这些因素可能适合采取预防措施。