Sterud Tom
National Institute of Occupational Health, PO Box 8149 Dep, NO-0033 Oslo, Norway.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2014 Jul;40(4):361-9. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3427. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
This study aimed to examine gender differences in physician-certified sick leave and the extent to which these differences can be explained by work-related psychosocial and mechanical risk factors.
Randomly drawn from the general population in Norway, the cohort comprised working men and women aged 18-69 years (N=12 255, response rate at baseline = 60.9%). Eligible respondents were interviewed in 2009 and registered with an active employee relationship of ≥ 100 actual working days in 2009 and 2010 (N=3688 men and 3070 women). The study measured 11 work-related psychosocial factors and 11 mechanical exposures, and outcomes of interest were physician-certified general sick leave (GSL) >0 days and long-term sick leave (LTSL) ≥ 40 working days during 2010.
Women reported a significantly higher level of exposure to 9 of the 11 psychosocial factors evaluated. For mechanical factors, the reporting was mixed. After controlling for age, educational level, sick leave during 2009, housework, working hours and family status, a 1.7-fold risk for GSL and LTSL were found among women. In comparison with the initial model, adjusting for psychosocial factors reduced the excess risk by 21% and 27% for GSL and LTSL, respectively. The total effect of mechanical factors was negligible. Differences between occupations held by women and men explained an additional one-tenth of the excess risk for LTSL among women.
Work-related psychosocial factors contributed significantly to a higher level of GSL and LTSL among women. The most important factors were demands for hiding emotions, emotional demands, and effort-payment imbalance.
本研究旨在探讨医生认证病假中的性别差异,以及这些差异在多大程度上可由与工作相关的心理社会和机械风险因素来解释。
该队列从挪威普通人群中随机抽取,由年龄在18 - 69岁的在职男性和女性组成(N = 12255,基线时的回复率 = 60.9%)。符合条件的受访者于2009年接受访谈,并在2009年和2010年登记有≥100个实际工作日的在职员工关系(N = 3688名男性和3070名女性)。该研究测量了11个与工作相关的心理社会因素和11种机械暴露情况,感兴趣的结果是2010年期间医生认证的全薪病假(GSL)>0天和长期病假(LTSL)≥40个工作日。
在评估的11个心理社会因素中,女性报告有9个因素的暴露水平显著更高。对于机械因素,报告情况不一。在控制了年龄、教育水平、2009年病假情况、家务劳动、工作时长和家庭状况后,发现女性患全薪病假和长期病假的风险是男性的1.7倍。与初始模型相比,调整心理社会因素后,全薪病假和长期病假的额外风险分别降低了21%和27%。机械因素的总体影响可忽略不计。男女职业差异又解释了女性长期病假额外风险的十分之一。
与工作相关的心理社会因素显著导致了女性更高水平的全薪病假和长期病假。最重要的因素是隐藏情绪的要求、情感需求以及付出与回报失衡。