• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于评估运动训练研究的研究质量和报告情况的新工具的验证:TESTEX。

Validation of a new tool for the assessment of study quality and reporting in exercise training studies: TESTEX.

作者信息

Smart Neil A, Waldron Mark, Ismail Hashbullah, Giallauria Francesco, Vigorito Carlo, Cornelissen Veronique, Dieberg Gudrun

机构信息

1University of New England, School of Science and Technology, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia 2Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Division of Internal Medicine and Cardiac Rehabilitation, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy 3University of Leuven, KU Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Mar;13(1):9-18. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000020.

DOI:10.1097/XEB.0000000000000020
PMID:25734864
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Several established tools are available to assess study quality and reporting of randomized controlled trials; however, these tools were designed with clinical intervention trials in mind. In exercise training intervention trials some of the traditional study quality criteria, such as participant or researcher blinding, are extremely difficult to implement.

METHODS

We developed the Tool for the assEssment of Study qualiTy and reporting in EXercise (TESTEX) - a study quality and reporting assessment tool, designed specifically for use in exercise training studies. Our tool is a 15-point scale (5 points for study quality and 10 points for reporting) and addresses previously unmentioned quality assessment criteria specific to exercise training studies.

RESULTS

There were no systematic differences between the summated TESTEX scores of each observer [H(2)=0.392, P=0.822]. There was a significant association between the summated TESTEX scores of the three observers, with almost perfect agreement between observers 1 and 2 [intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC)=0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82-0.97, P<0.001], observers 1 and 3 (ICC= 0.96, 95% CI 0.89-0.98, P<0.001) and observers 2 and 3 (ICC=0.91, 95% CI 0.75-0.96, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The TESTEX scale is a new, reliable tool, specific to exercise scientists, that facilitates a comprehensive review of exercise training trials.

摘要

引言

有几种既定的工具可用于评估随机对照试验的研究质量和报告情况;然而,这些工具是在考虑临床干预试验的情况下设计的。在运动训练干预试验中,一些传统的研究质量标准,如参与者或研究者的盲法,极难实施。

方法

我们开发了运动研究质量与报告评估工具(TESTEX)——一种专门为运动训练研究设计的研究质量和报告评估工具。我们的工具采用15分制(研究质量5分,报告10分),并涉及运动训练研究中以前未提及的质量评估标准。

结果

各观察者的TESTEX总分之间无系统差异[H(2)=0.392,P=0.822]。三位观察者的TESTEX总分之间存在显著关联,观察者1和观察者2之间几乎完全一致[组内相关系数(ICC)=0.93,95%置信区间(CI)0.82 - 0.97,P<0.001],观察者1和观察者3之间(ICC = 0.96,95%CI 0.89 - 0.98,P<0.001)以及观察者2和观察者3之间(ICC = 0.91,95%CI 0.75 - 0.96,P<0.001)。

结论

TESTEX量表是一种专门为运动科学家设计的新型可靠工具,有助于对运动训练试验进行全面综述。

相似文献

1
Validation of a new tool for the assessment of study quality and reporting in exercise training studies: TESTEX.一种用于评估运动训练研究的研究质量和报告情况的新工具的验证:TESTEX。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Mar;13(1):9-18. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000020.
2
The ANHEQ Evaluation Criteria: Introducing Reliable Rating Scales for Assessing Nordic Hamstring Exercise Quality.ANHEQ评估标准:引入用于评估北欧腿弯举练习质量的可靠评分量表。
Sports Med Open. 2021 Dec 11;7(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40798-021-00383-x.
3
Development and reliability assessment of a new quality appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies using biomarker data (BIOCROSS).基于生物标志物数据的横断面研究新质量评价工具(BIOCROSS)的开发和可靠性评估。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 6;18(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0583-x.
4
Review of exercise studies in breast cancer survivors: attention to principles of exercise training.乳腺癌幸存者运动研究述评:关注运动训练原则。
Br J Sports Med. 2012 Oct;46(13):909-16. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2010-082719.
5
Improvement in the quality of randomized controlled trials among general anesthesiology journals 2000 to 2006: a 6-year follow-up.2000年至2006年普通麻醉学杂志随机对照试验质量的改善:一项为期6年的随访研究。
Anesth Analg. 2009 Jun;108(6):1916-21. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31819fe6d7.
6
Moderator effects in a randomized controlled trial of exercise training in lymphoma patients.随机对照试验中运动训练对淋巴瘤患者的调节作用。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Oct;18(10):2600-7. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0504.
7
Quality versus Risk-of-Bias assessment in clinical research.临床研究中的质量与偏倚风险评估。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;129:172-175. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.044.
8
[Adapted exercise: physical exercise as a therapeutic tool].[适应性运动:作为治疗工具的体育锻炼]
Rev Med Chil. 2018 Jan;146(1):123-124. doi: 10.4067/s0034-98872018000100123.
9
Feedback from a consumer would be useful.消费者的反馈会很有用。
Man Ther. 2003 Nov;8(4):263; discussion 264-5. doi: 10.1016/s1356-689x(03)00057-2.
10
'What should I prescribe?': time to improve reporting of resistance training programmes to ensure accurate translation and implementation.“我该开什么处方?”:是时候改进抗阻训练计划的报告,以确保准确的转化与实施了。
Br J Sports Med. 2019 Mar;53(5):264-265. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098664. Epub 2018 Jun 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness and safety of home-based centre-based exercise programmes for pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review with meta-analysis.基于家庭和基于中心的运动方案对肺动脉高压的有效性和安全性:一项荟萃分析的系统评价
Eur Respir Rev. 2025 Sep 3;34(177). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0102-2025. Print 2025 Jul.
2
Leisure Activities for Mild Cognitive Impairment: Reconsidering an Intriguing Hypothesis Through a Methodological Lens [Letter].轻度认知障碍的休闲活动:透过方法论视角重新审视一个有趣的假设[信函]
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2025 Aug 27;21:1795-1798. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S561567. eCollection 2025.
3
Effects of different exercise modes on the risk factors of arteriosclerosis in postmenopausal women: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
不同运动模式对绝经后女性动脉硬化危险因素的影响:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
J Hum Hypertens. 2025 Aug 26. doi: 10.1038/s41371-025-01064-y.
4
Functional exercise training in persons with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review.多发性硬化症患者的功能锻炼训练:一项系统综述。
J Neurol. 2025 Aug 23;272(9):590. doi: 10.1007/s00415-025-13311-w.
5
Effect of Exercise Training with Consideration of Potential Moderating Variables in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.考虑潜在调节变量的运动训练对心房颤动患者的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Sports Med Open. 2025 Aug 22;11(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s40798-025-00906-w.
6
Effects of olympic combat sports on physical fitness in non-athlete students: a systematic review with meta-analysis.奥林匹克格斗运动对非运动员学生身体素质的影响:一项荟萃分析的系统评价
Front Physiol. 2025 Jul 14;16:1620621. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1620621. eCollection 2025.
7
Exercise and pulmonary embolism: a systematic review of exercise safety, feasibility and effectiveness.运动与肺栓塞:运动安全性、可行性及有效性的系统评价
Eur Respir Rev. 2025 Jul 23;34(177). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0241-2024. Print 2025 Jul.
8
An assessment of study characteristics, quality and reporting in cancer prehabilitation literature: a scoping review.癌症术前康复文献的研究特征、质量及报告情况评估:一项范围综述
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 11;15(7):e093832. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093832.
9
Optimization of high-intensity resistance exercise protocols for improving bone mineral density in the elderly without chronic diseases: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.优化高强度抗阻运动方案以改善无慢性疾病老年人的骨密度:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Front Physiol. 2025 Jun 10;16:1589200. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1589200. eCollection 2025.
10
Effects of boxing interventions on physical fitness and health-related quality of life in older people with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review with meta-analysis.拳击干预对帕金森病老年人身体素质及健康相关生活质量的影响:一项Meta分析的系统评价
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 6;13:1589512. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1589512. eCollection 2025.