Xiang Wu, Lei Yuan-Jiao, Xiang Han, Qiu Ying-Bo, Wang Jun-Yu, Zhang An-Ren
School of Health Preservation and Rehabilitation, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Shared first authorship.
Eur Respir Rev. 2025 Jul 23;34(177). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0241-2024. Print 2025 Jul.
Long-term survivors of pulmonary embolism (PE) exhibit decreased exercise capacity, dyspnoea and a diminished quality of life. Exercise may represent a beneficial strategy for ameliorating persistent symptoms following PE.
Is exercise training beneficial for improving exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with PE? Additionally, is it safe and feasible?
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the safety, feasibility and efficacy of exercise training in improving exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with PE. In order to comprehensively assess the available evidence, we conducted a systematic review using a combination of free-text terms and medical subject headings according to database requirements in PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase and the Cochrane Library from inception until 17 September 2024.
We included a total of nine trials including 583 patients, including 391 in the interventional group and 190 in the control group. The difference in the average adverse event rates between the exercise group (0.5%) and the control group (0%) was not significant. The overall recruitment rate was approximately 51% (range: 38-65%), the withdrawal rate was approximately 5% (range: 0-13%) and the adherence rate was 87% (range: 61-100%). The studies reported average improvements in peak oxygen consumption (exercise group: 7.55 mL·kg·min; control group: 1.95 mL·kg·min), incremental shuttle walk test distance (exercise group: 142 m; control group: 69.5 m), vitality scores (exercise group: 13.95; control group: 3.95), and role emotional scores (exercise group: 12.05; control group: -0.1). However, due to considerable discrepancies in the scoring systems, an average improvement in Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life questionnaire score could not be determined. Notably, no improvement in dyspnoea was reported.
This systematic review indicates that exercise training seems to be safe and feasible for patients with PE. It appears to enhance patients' exercise capacity and quality of life, although its impact on alleviating dyspnoea remains limited. However, given the absence of large-scale randomised controlled trials, these findings should be interpreted with caution.
肺栓塞(PE)长期幸存者表现出运动能力下降、呼吸困难及生活质量降低。运动可能是改善PE后持续症状的有益策略。
运动训练对改善PE患者的运动能力和生活质量是否有益?此外,它是否安全可行?
本系统评价的目的是评估运动训练在改善PE患者运动能力和生活质量方面的安全性、可行性和有效性。为全面评估现有证据,我们根据PubMed、Medline、科学引文索引、Scopus、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库要求,结合自由文本术语和医学主题词进行了一项系统评价,检索时间从数据库建立至2024年9月17日。
我们共纳入9项试验,包括583例患者,其中干预组391例,对照组190例。运动组(0.5%)和对照组(0%)的平均不良事件发生率差异无统计学意义。总体招募率约为51%(范围:38 - 65%),退出率约为5%(范围:0 - 13%),依从率为87%(范围:61 - 100%)。研究报告显示,峰值摄氧量(运动组:7.55 mL·kg·min;对照组:1.95 mL·kg·min)、递增穿梭步行试验距离(运动组:142 m;对照组:69.5 m)、活力评分(运动组:13.95;对照组:3.95)和角色情感评分(运动组:12.05;对照组:-0.1)均有平均改善。然而,由于评分系统存在较大差异,无法确定肺栓塞生活质量问卷评分的平均改善情况。值得注意的是,未报告呼吸困难有改善。
本系统评价表明,运动训练对PE患者似乎是安全可行的。它似乎能提高患者的运动能力和生活质量,尽管其对缓解呼吸困难的影响仍然有限。然而,鉴于缺乏大规模随机对照试验,这些结果应谨慎解读。