Slippers B, Roux J, Wingfield M J, van der Walt F J J, Jami F, Mehl J W M, Marais G J
Department of Genetics, DST/NRF Centre of Excellence in Tree Health Biotechnology (CTHB), Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield, Pretoria, 0028, South Africa;
Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, DST/NRF Centre of Excellence in Tree Health Biotechnology (CTHB), Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield, Pretoria, 0028, South Africa.
Persoonia. 2014 Dec;33:155-68. doi: 10.3767/003158514X684780. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
Identification of fungi and the International Code of Nomenclature underpinning this process, rests strongly on the characterisation of morphological structures. Yet, the value of these characters to define species in many groups has become questionable or even superfluous. This has emerged as DNA-based techniques have increasingly revealed cryptic species and species complexes. This problem is vividly illustrated in the present study where 105 isolates of the Botryosphaeriales were recovered from both healthy and diseased woody tissues of native Acacia spp. in Namibia and South Africa. Thirteen phylogenetically distinct groups were identified based on Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) rDNA PCR-RFLP and translation elongation factor 1-α (TEF1-α) sequence data, two loci that are known to be reliable markers to distinguish species in the Botryosphaeriales. Four of these groups could be linked reliably to sequence data for formerly described species, including Botryosphaeria dothidea, Dothiorella dulcispinae, Lasiodiplodia pseudotheobromae and Spencermartinsia viticola. Nine groups, however, could not be linked to any other species known from culture and for which sequence data are available. These groups are, therefore, described as Aplosporella africana, A. papillata, Botryosphaeria auasmontanum, Dothiorella capri-amissi, Do. oblonga, Lasiodiplodia pyriformis, Spencermartinsia rosulata, Sphaeropsis variabilis and an undescribed Neofusicoccum sp. The species described here could not be reliably compared with the thousands of taxa described in these genera from other hosts and regions, where only morphological data are available. Such comparison would be possible only if all previously described taxa are epitypified, which is not a viable objective for the two families, Botryosphaeriaceae and Aplosporellaceae, in the Botryosphaeriales identified here. The extent of diversity of the Botryosphaeriales revealed in this and other recent studies is expected to reflect that of other undersampled regions and hosts, and illustrates the urgency to find more effective ways to describe species in this, and indeed other, groups of fungi.
真菌的鉴定以及支撑这一过程的《国际命名法规》,在很大程度上依赖于形态结构的特征描述。然而,这些特征在许多类群中用于定义物种的价值已变得可疑甚至多余。随着基于DNA的技术越来越多地揭示出隐存种和物种复合体,这一问题逐渐显现。本研究生动地说明了这一问题,从纳米比亚和南非本土金合欢属植物健康和患病的木质组织中分离出105株葡萄座腔菌目菌株。基于内转录间隔区(ITS)rDNA PCR-RFLP和翻译延伸因子1-α(TEF1-α)序列数据鉴定出13个系统发育上不同的类群,这两个位点是已知的区分葡萄座腔菌目物种的可靠标记。其中四个类群可以可靠地与先前描述物种的序列数据相关联,包括葡萄座腔菌、甜果小穴壳菌、拟可可毛色二孢和葡萄座腔菌属葡萄生种。然而,有九个类群无法与任何其他已知的培养物种及其可用序列数据相关联。因此,这些类群被描述为非洲盘多毛孢、乳头盘多毛孢、奥氏葡萄座腔菌、卡普里阿米西小穴壳菌、长形小穴壳菌、梨形毛色二孢、玫瑰葡萄座腔菌、可变拟茎点霉和一个未描述的新壳梭孢属物种。这里描述的物种无法与这些属中来自其他寄主和地区的数千个仅基于形态学数据描述的分类单元进行可靠比较。只有在所有先前描述的分类单元都有后选模式的情况下才有可能进行这种比较,而对于这里鉴定的葡萄座腔菌目中的葡萄座腔菌科和盘多毛孢科这两个科来说,这不是一个可行的目标。本研究及其他近期研究中揭示的葡萄座腔菌目的多样性程度预计反映了其他采样不足的地区和寄主的情况,并说明了迫切需要找到更有效的方法来描述该真菌类群以及其他真菌类群中的物种。