Lupus Clinic, Reumatologia, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e specialità Mediche, Sapienza Università di Roma, Italy.
Lupus Clinic, Reumatologia, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e specialità Mediche, Sapienza Università di Roma, Italy.
Autoimmun Rev. 2015 Jul;14(7):601-8. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2015.02.008. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
The assessment of disease activity in patients affected by Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) represents an important issue, as recommended by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR). Two main types of disease activity measure have been proposed: the global score systems, providing an overall measure of activity, and the individual organ/system assessment scales, assessing disease activity in different organs. All the activity indices included both clinical and laboratory items, related to the disease manifestations. However, there is no gold standard to measure disease activity in patients affected by SLE. In this review, we will analyze the lights and shadows of the disease activity indices, by means of a critical approach. In particular, we will focus on SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) and British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG), the most frequently used in randomized controlled trials and observational studies. The evaluation of data from the literature underlined some limitations of these indices, making their application in clinical practice difficult and suggesting the possible use of specific tools in the different subset of SLE patients, in order to capture all the disease features.
评估系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者的疾病活动度是一个重要问题,这也是欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)的建议。目前已经提出了两种主要类型的疾病活动度衡量方法:整体评分系统,提供疾病活动的整体衡量;以及针对不同器官的个体器官/系统评估量表,评估疾病在不同器官中的活动度。所有的活动指数都包含了与疾病表现相关的临床和实验室项目。然而,目前尚无金标准来衡量 SLE 患者的疾病活动度。在这篇综述中,我们将通过批判性的方法来分析疾病活动度指数的优缺点。特别地,我们将重点关注 SLE 疾病活动度指数(SLEDAI)和不列颠群岛狼疮评估组(BILAG),这两个指数在随机对照试验和观察性研究中被广泛应用。对文献数据的评估凸显了这些指数的一些局限性,使得它们在临床实践中的应用变得困难,并建议在不同的 SLE 患者亚组中使用特定的工具,以捕捉所有疾病特征。