Strand V, Gladman D, Isenberg D, Petri M, Smolen J, Tugwell P
Division of Immunology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, USA.
J Rheumatol. 1999 Feb;26(2):490-7.
The optimal outcome measures to be employed in clinical trials of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have yet to be determined. Useful instruments should assess disease outcome in terms of all organ system involvement, as well as measures important to the patient. This article reviews those outcome measures that have been utilized in cohort studies in SLE, as well as their limited use in randomized clinical trials (RCT). Six disease activity measures have been developed: British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Scale (BILAG), European Consensus Lupus Activity Measure (ECLAM), Lupus Activity Index (LAI), National Institutes of Health SLE Index Score (SIS), Systemic Lupus Activity Measure (SLAM), and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI). They have been validated in cohort studies as reflecting change in disease activity, and against each other. RCT utilizing SLAM, SLEDAI, BILAG, ECLAM, SIS, SLAM, SLEDAI are ongoing. It is recommended that the disease activity index of choice be selected; but simultaneous computer generation of multiple indices will facilitate comparisons across therapeutic interventions. A damage index has been developed and validated as the Systemic Lupus International Cooperating Clinics (SLICC)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Damage Index or SDI. In several cohort studies it has been shown sensitive to change over time, and to reflect cumulative disease activity. There is no health status or disability instrument specific to SLE. The Medical Outcomes Survey (SF-20) captures health status/health related quality of life (HRQOL) better than the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) in patients with SLE, but does not adequately reflect fatigue. The SF-36 does assess fatigue, and correlates closely with the SF-20. These data indicate that any individual measure of clinical response to a therapeutic intervention in SLE may reflect only a portion of what might be termed the "true outcome." Based on this work, the way is now paved to attempt to develop consensus on the important domains to be measured in clinical trials in SLE, the most appropriate instruments to use and the minimal clinically important differences in their results.
系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)临床试验中应采用的最佳疗效指标尚未确定。有效的评估工具应能从所有器官系统受累情况以及对患者重要的指标方面来评估疾病转归。本文回顾了那些在SLE队列研究中使用过的疗效指标,以及它们在随机临床试验(RCT)中的有限应用。已开发出六种疾病活动度评估指标:不列颠群岛狼疮评估组量表(BILAG)、欧洲狼疮活动度共识评估指标(ECLAM)、狼疮活动指数(LAI)、美国国立卫生研究院SLE指数评分(SIS)、系统性狼疮活动度评估指标(SLAM)以及系统性红斑狼疮疾病活动指数(SLEDAI)。它们在队列研究中已得到验证,可反映疾病活动度的变化,且相互之间也经过了验证。使用SLAM、SLEDAI、BILAG、ECLAM、SIS、SLAM、SLEDAI的RCT正在进行中。建议选择首选的疾病活动度指数;但同时通过计算机生成多个指数将便于对不同治疗干预措施进行比较。已开发出一种损伤指数,并作为系统性红斑狼疮国际协作临床中心(SLICC)/美国风湿病学会(ACR)损伤指数或SDI得到验证。在多项队列研究中已表明,它对随时间的变化敏感,并能反映累积疾病活动度。目前尚无专门针对SLE的健康状况或残疾评估工具。医疗结局调查问卷(SF - 20)在SLE患者中比健康评估问卷(HAQ)能更好地反映健康状况/健康相关生活质量(HRQOL),但不能充分反映疲劳情况。SF - 36确实能评估疲劳情况,且与SF - 20密切相关。这些数据表明,对于SLE治疗干预的临床反应的任何单一评估指标可能仅反映了所谓“真实结局”的一部分。基于这项工作,现在已为尝试就SLE临床试验中要测量的重要领域、最适合使用的工具以及其结果中最小的临床重要差异达成共识铺平了道路。