• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住院患者左心室辅助装置驱动线感染与换药频率

Left ventricular assist device driveline infection and the frequency of dressing change in hospitalized patients.

作者信息

Wus Lisa, Manning MaryLou, Entwistle John W C

机构信息

Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 111 South 11th Street, Suite 5480N, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.

Thomas Jefferson University, Jefferson School of Nursing, 901 Walnut Street, Suite 814, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.

出版信息

Heart Lung. 2015 May-Jun;44(3):225-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2015.02.001
PMID:25746483
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine if driveline infection is related to dressing change frequency in hospitalized adult patients with newly implanted left ventricular assist devices (LVAD).

BACKGROUND

Guidelines do not exist for the frequency of driveline exit-site dressing change in hospitalized patients resulting in wide variation in practice.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted on 68 patients implanted with a HeartMate II LVAD between August 2008 and September 2013 at an urban medical center.

RESULTS

No driveline infections were found. Frequency of the driveline dressing change varied from daily, three times a week, and weekly. The daily dressing change group was younger in age compared to the weekly group (p = 0.005) and three times a week group (p = 0.001). No other differences were found.

CONCLUSION

Driveline infections do not appear to be related to the frequency of dressing change in this population. Our data and other studies on this topic thus far are too limited to draw definitive conclusions about optimal frequency of dressing change for infection prevention.

摘要

目的

确定住院的新植入左心室辅助装置(LVAD)的成年患者中,驱动线感染是否与换药频率相关。

背景

目前尚无针对住院患者驱动线出口部位换药频率的指南,这导致实际操作差异很大。

方法

对2008年8月至2013年9月期间在一家城市医疗中心植入HeartMate II LVAD的68例患者进行回顾性病历审查。

结果

未发现驱动线感染。驱动线换药频率从每日、每周三次到每周一次不等。与每周换药组(p = 0.005)和每周三次换药组(p = 0.001)相比,每日换药组年龄更小。未发现其他差异。

结论

在该人群中,驱动线感染似乎与换药频率无关。我们的数据以及迄今为止关于该主题的其他研究都过于有限,无法就预防感染的最佳换药频率得出明确结论。

相似文献

1
Left ventricular assist device driveline infection and the frequency of dressing change in hospitalized patients.住院患者左心室辅助装置驱动线感染与换药频率
Heart Lung. 2015 May-Jun;44(3):225-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
2
Driveline exit-site care protocols in patients with left ventricular assist devices: a systematic review.左心室辅助装置患者的外接管出口部位护理方案:系统评价。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Sep 11;60(3):506-515. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab195.
3
Special Treatment and Wound Care of the Driveline Exit Site after Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.左心室辅助装置植入术后驱动线出口部位的特殊处理与伤口护理
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Dec;63(8):670-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1554961. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
4
Prevention of percutaneous driveline infection after left ventricular assist device implantation: prophylactic antibiotics are not necessary.预防左心室辅助装置植入术后经皮导管感染:预防性使用抗生素并非必要。
ASAIO J. 2013 Nov-Dec;59(6):570-4. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e3182a9e2a5.
5
Substantial Reduction in Driveline Infection Rates With the Modification of Driveline Dressing Protocol.实质性降低了导尿系统感染率与导尿系统敷料方案的改进。
J Card Fail. 2018 Nov;24(11):746-752. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2018.07.464. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
6
Reduce Driveline Trauma Through Stabilization and Exit Site Management: 30 Days Feasibility Results from the Multicenter RESIST Study.通过稳定化和出口部位管理减少传动系统创伤:多中心RESIST研究的30天可行性结果
ASAIO J. 2016 May-Jun;62(3):240-5. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000374.
7
Late-onset driveline infections: the Achilles' heel of prolonged left ventricular assist device support.迟发性传动系统感染:长期左心室辅助装置支持的致命弱点。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Aug;84(2):515-20. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.03.085.
8
Low Incidence of Pump-Related Infections in Jarvik 2000 Ventricular Assist Device Recipients with a Subcostal Driveline Exit Site.采用肋下驱动线出口部位的Jarvik 2000心室辅助装置受者中与泵相关感染的发生率较低。
Tex Heart Inst J. 2019 Jun 1;46(3):179-182. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-15-5708. eCollection 2019 Jun.
9
Double tunnel technique for the LVAD driveline: improved management regarding driveline infections.左心室辅助装置驱动线的双隧道技术:改善驱动线感染的管理
J Artif Organs. 2012 Mar;15(1):44-8. doi: 10.1007/s10047-011-0607-3. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
10
Risk of left ventricular assist device driveline infection: A systematic literature review.左心室辅助装置驱动线感染的风险:系统文献回顾。
Heart Lung. 2019 Mar-Apr;48(2):90-104. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-patient factors associated with infections in LVAD recipients: A scoping review.与 LVAD 受者感染相关的非患者因素:范围综述。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2022 Jan;41(1):1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
2
Driveline exit-site care protocols in patients with left ventricular assist devices: a systematic review.左心室辅助装置患者的外接管出口部位护理方案:系统评价。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Sep 11;60(3):506-515. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab195.
3
In Full Flow: Left Ventricular Assist Device Infections in the Modern Era.
全面解析:现代左心室辅助装置感染
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 17;7(5):ofaa124. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa124. eCollection 2020 May.
4
Wound care of the driveline exit site in patients with a ventricular assist device: A systematic review.心室辅助装置患者驱动线出口部位的伤口护理:一项系统综述。
Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2018 Apr 30;26(2):328-335. doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2018.14982. eCollection 2018 Apr.
5
2019 EACTS Expert Consensus on long-term mechanical circulatory support.2019 年 EACTS 专家共识:长期机械循环支持
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Aug 1;56(2):230-270. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz098.
6
Left Ventricular Assist Device Infections: A Systematic Review.左心室辅助装置感染:系统评价。
ASAIO J. 2018 May/Jun;64(3):287-294. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000684.
7
Left ventricular assist device driveline infections: recent advances and future goals.左心室辅助装置驱动线感染:最新进展与未来目标
J Thorac Dis. 2015 Dec;7(12):2151-7. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.11.06.