Suppr超能文献

淋巴水肿症状与严重程度调查量表-手臂版的开发与验证

Development and validation of the Lymphedema Symptom and Intensity Survey-Arm.

作者信息

Ridner Sheila H, Dietrich Mary S

机构信息

Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, 461 21st Avenue South, Godchaux Hall, Nashville, TN, 37240, USA,

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2015 Oct;23(10):3103-12. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2684-y. Epub 2015 Mar 10.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this instrument development project was to create a self-report tool to evaluate arm lymphedema and associated symptoms in breast cancer survivors.

METHODS

The Lymphedema Symptom Intensity and Distress Survey-Arm (LSIDS-A) was developed and tested in three phases: phase 1-literature review and expert panel; phase 2-preliminary validation; and phase 3-final validation.

RESULTS

Phase 1: The most common symptoms experienced by breast cancer survivors with lymphedema were identified. A 52-item scale was developed. Phase 2: 128 community-dwelling breast cancer survivors (64 with lymphedema, 64 without lymphedema) completed the LSIDS-A. Feedback from the participants was that the format was "clear" and "made sense"; therefore, the response structure was left intact. Sixteen items were deleted leaving a 36-item revised instrument. Phase 3: Subsequent testing in a total sample of 236 breast cancer survivors with lymphedema was undertaken. The Cronbach's alpha reliability values for the overall intensity and distress scores were 0.93 and 0.94, respectively. The Kuder-Richardson values ranged from 0.66 to 0.92. Divergent validity evaluated against Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirebility Scale overall was acceptable (intensity, r s = 0.08; distress, r s  = -0.12). Convergent validity was acceptable as tested with multiple instruments (e.g., Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast +4, overall intensity r s   = -0.44, overall distress r s   = -.48) CONCLUSIONS: The 30-item LSIDS-A is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used to assess arm lymphedema and its associated symptoms.

摘要

目的

本仪器开发项目的目的是创建一种自我报告工具,以评估乳腺癌幸存者的手臂淋巴水肿及相关症状。

方法

淋巴水肿症状强度与困扰调查-手臂版(LSIDS-A)分三个阶段进行开发和测试:第1阶段-文献综述和专家小组;第2阶段-初步验证;第3阶段-最终验证。

结果

第1阶段:确定了患有淋巴水肿的乳腺癌幸存者最常见的症状。编制了一个包含52个条目的量表。第2阶段:128名社区居住的乳腺癌幸存者(64名有淋巴水肿,64名无淋巴水肿)完成了LSIDS-A。参与者的反馈是,该量表的形式“清晰”且“合理”;因此,响应结构保持不变。删除了16个条目,留下一个包含36个条目的修订版工具。第3阶段:随后对总共236名患有淋巴水肿的乳腺癌幸存者进行了测试。总体强度和困扰评分的克朗巴哈系数可靠性值分别为0.93和0.94。库德-理查森值范围为0.66至0.92。与马洛-克劳恩社会期望量表相比,总体发散效度是可接受的(强度,rs = 0.08;困扰,rs = -0.12)。经多种工具测试,收敛效度是可接受的(例如,癌症治疗功能评估-乳腺癌+4,总体强度rs = -0.44,总体困扰rs = -0.48)结论:包含30个条目的LSIDS-A是一种有效且可靠的工具,可用于评估手臂淋巴水肿及其相关症状。

相似文献

8
Refinement and Validation of the Head and Neck Lymphedema and Fibrosis Symptom Inventory.头颈部淋巴水肿和纤维化症状量表的修订与验证。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Mar 1;109(3):747-755. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.10.003. Epub 2020 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

9
Health-related Quality of Life Measurement Tools for Lymphedema: A Review of the Literature.淋巴水肿的健康相关生活质量测量工具:文献综述
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Apr 27;10(4):e4276. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004276. eCollection 2022 Apr.
10
The prevention and treatment of breast cancer- related lymphedema: A review.乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的防治:综述
Front Oncol. 2022 Dec 6;12:1062472. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1062472. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

8
Voices from the shadows: living with lymphedema.来自阴影的声音:与淋巴水肿共存。
Cancer Nurs. 2012 Jan-Feb;35(1):E18-26. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e31821404c0.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验