• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下肢淋巴水肿症状严重程度与困扰调查问卷的开发与验证

Development and Validation of the Lymphedema Symptom Intensity and Distress Survey-Lower Limb.

作者信息

Ridner Sheila H, Doersam Jennifer K, Stolldorf Deonni P, Dietrich Mary S

机构信息

1 Vanderbilt University School of Nursing , Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.

2 School of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.

出版信息

Lymphat Res Biol. 2018 Dec;16(6):538-546. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2017.0069. Epub 2018 Oct 24.

DOI:10.1089/lrb.2017.0069
PMID:30359205
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6306663/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lymphedema is a chronic, incurable condition that occurs most commonly in lower limbs (legs and feet). Increased morbidity is seen with this form of lymphedema, but there are few studies and even fewer tools intended to assess symptom burden in patients impacted by this condition. A questionnaire, the Lymphedema Symptom Intensity and Distress Survey-Lower Limb (LSIDS-L), was developed to fill this gap. The measure is composed of several clusters of symptoms thought to characterize lower limb lymphedema. The initial work was conducted to propose and assess the face validity of the clusters. Subsequently, work was undertaken to empirically evaluate the presence of the symptom clusters, assess the reliability of the cluster scores, and evaluate the validity of the scores by studying associations with other valid measures.

METHODS AND RESULTS

During the initial work, the LSIDS-L was tested with lower limb lymphedema patients only, and in the subsequent work the LSIDS-L and valid measures were administered to patients with no lymphedema and with lower limb lymphedema. A total of 388 volunteers participated, 111 of whom indicated no diagnosis of lymphedema, and 277 indicated a diagnosis of lower limb lymphedema. Cluster analysis resulted in the exclusion of 5 items, yielding 8 clusters with a total of 31 items. Cluster scores demonstrated acceptable internal consistency, distinguished nonlymphedema patients from lower lymphedema patients, and demonstrated expected convergent and divergent validity with other valid measures.

CONCLUSION

The LSIDS-L is a valid tool for detecting and quantifying symptom burden in patients with lower limb lymphedema.

摘要

背景

淋巴水肿是一种慢性、无法治愈的病症,最常发生于下肢(腿部和足部)。这种类型的淋巴水肿会导致发病率增加,但针对评估受该病症影响患者的症状负担的研究较少,相关工具更是稀缺。为填补这一空白,研发了一份问卷,即下肢淋巴水肿症状强度与困扰调查问卷(LSIDS-L)。该测量工具由几组被认为是下肢淋巴水肿特征性症状组成。最初开展的工作是提出并评估这些症状组的表面效度。随后,进行了实证研究,以评估症状组的存在情况,评估症状组得分的可靠性,并通过研究与其他有效测量方法的关联来评估得分的效度。

方法与结果

在最初的工作中,仅对下肢淋巴水肿患者进行了LSIDS-L测试,在后续工作中,对无淋巴水肿患者和下肢淋巴水肿患者同时施测了LSIDS-L和有效测量方法。共有388名志愿者参与,其中111人表示未被诊断为淋巴水肿,277人表示被诊断为下肢淋巴水肿。聚类分析导致排除了5个项目,产生了8个症状组,共31个项目。症状组得分显示出可接受的内部一致性,能够区分非淋巴水肿患者和轻度淋巴水肿患者,并与其他有效测量方法显示出预期的聚合效度和区分效度。

结论

LSIDS-L是一种用于检测和量化下肢淋巴水肿患者症状负担的有效工具。

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of the Lymphedema Symptom Intensity and Distress Survey-Lower Limb.下肢淋巴水肿症状严重程度与困扰调查问卷的开发与验证
Lymphat Res Biol. 2018 Dec;16(6):538-546. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2017.0069. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
2
Lymphedema Symptom Intensity and Distress Surveys-Truncal and Head and Neck, Version 2.0.淋巴水肿症状严重程度和痛苦调查-躯干和头颈部,第二版。
Lymphat Res Biol. 2021 Jun;19(3):240-248. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2020.0071. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
3
Development and validation of the Lymphedema Symptom and Intensity Survey-Arm.淋巴水肿症状与严重程度调查量表-手臂版的开发与验证
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Oct;23(10):3103-12. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2684-y. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
4
Refinement and Validation of the Head and Neck Lymphedema and Fibrosis Symptom Inventory.头颈部淋巴水肿和纤维化症状量表的修订与验证。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Mar 1;109(3):747-755. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.10.003. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
5
Revision of the Lymphedema Functioning, Disability and Health Questionnaire for Upper Limb Lymphedema (Lymph-ICF-UL): Reliability and Validity.上肢淋巴水肿的淋巴水肿功能、残疾和健康问卷修订版(Lymph-ICF-UL):信度与效度
Lymphat Res Biol. 2019 Jun;17(3):347-355. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2018.0025. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
6
Symptom Frequency, Intensity, and Distress in Patients with Lower Limb Lymphedema.下肢淋巴水肿患者的症状频率、强度及痛苦程度
Lymphat Res Biol. 2016 Jun;14(2):78-87. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2015.0027. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
7
Psychometric Evaluation of a Brazilian Version of the Lymphedema Functioning, Disability and Health Questionnaire for Lower Limb Lymphedema in Patients After Cancer Treatment.巴西版癌症治疗后下肢淋巴水肿患者淋巴水肿功能、残疾和健康问卷的心理测量评估。
Lymphat Res Biol. 2022 Feb;20(1):82-88. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2020.0135. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
8
The Value of Using a SkinFibroMeter for Diagnosis and Assessment of Secondary Lymphedema and Associated Fibrosis of Lower Limb Skin.使用皮肤纤维测定仪诊断和评估继发性淋巴水肿及下肢皮肤相关纤维化的价值
Lymphat Res Biol. 2017 Mar;15(1):70-76. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2016.0029. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
9
Preliminary development of a lymphedema symptom assessment scale for patients with head and neck cancer.头颈部癌症患者淋巴水肿症状评估量表的初步研制。
Support Care Cancer. 2012 Aug;20(8):1911-8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1294-6. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
10
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the lymphedema symptom intensity and distress survey.土耳其语版淋巴水肿症状严重程度与困扰调查问卷的效度和信度
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Dec 1;67(4):428-438. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2021.6228. eCollection 2021 Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
Acceptance of disability, coping style, perceived social support and quality of life among patients with chronic lymphedema: a cross-sectional study.慢性淋巴水肿患者的残疾接受度、应对方式、感知社会支持和生活质量:一项横断面研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 May;30(5):4099-4108. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-06855-4. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
2
Effects of Intermittent Pneumatic Compression on Lower Limb Lymphedema in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.间歇性气动压迫对2型糖尿病患者下肢淋巴水肿的影响:一项初步随机对照试验
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Sep 25;57(10):1018. doi: 10.3390/medicina57101018.
3
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures With Secondary Lower Limb Lymphedemas: A Systematic Review.继发性下肢淋巴水肿的患者报告结局指标:一项系统评价
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2021 Mar;12(2):174-187. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2021.12.2.5. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
4
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Lymphedema: A Systematic Review and COSMIN Analysis.患者报告结局测量在淋巴水肿中的应用:系统评价和 COMSIN 分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Mar;28(3):1656-1668. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09346-0. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
5
Lymphedema Symptom Intensity and Distress Surveys-Truncal and Head and Neck, Version 2.0.淋巴水肿症状严重程度和痛苦调查-躯干和头颈部,第二版。
Lymphat Res Biol. 2021 Jun;19(3):240-248. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2020.0071. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
6
Standardization of lower extremity quantitative lymphedema measurements and associated patient-reported outcomes in gynecologic cancers.妇科癌症下肢定量淋巴水肿测量及其相关患者报告结局的标准化。
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Feb;160(2):625-632. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.10.026. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
7
A Comparison of Symptoms Among Patients with Head and Neck or Truncal Lymphedema and Normal Controls.头颈部或躯干淋巴水肿患者与正常对照者症状比较。
Lymphat Res Biol. 2019 Dec;17(6):661-670. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2019.0034. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
8
Comparison of Staging Systems to Assess Lymphedema Caused by Cancer Therapies, Lymphatic Filariasis, and Podoconiosis.评估癌症治疗、淋巴丝虫病和足分支菌病所致淋巴水肿的分期系统比较
Lymphat Res Biol. 2019 Oct;17(5):550-556. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2018.0063. Epub 2019 Oct 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparisons Between Cancer-Related and Noncancer-Related Lymphedema: An Overview of New Patients Referred to a Specialized Hospital-Based Center in Canada.癌症相关淋巴水肿与非癌症相关淋巴水肿的比较:加拿大一家专科医院中心新转诊患者概述
Lymphat Res Biol. 2017 Mar;15(1):64-69. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2016.0023. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
2
A Comparison of the Quality of Life in Patients With Primary and Secondary Lower Limb Lymphedema: A Mixed-Methods Study.原发性与继发性下肢淋巴水肿患者生活质量的比较:一项混合方法研究。
West J Nurs Res. 2016 Oct;38(10):1313-34. doi: 10.1177/0193945916647961. Epub 2016 May 5.
3
Symptom Frequency, Intensity, and Distress in Patients with Lower Limb Lymphedema.下肢淋巴水肿患者的症状频率、强度及痛苦程度
Lymphat Res Biol. 2016 Jun;14(2):78-87. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2015.0027. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
4
Low Lymphatic Pumping Pressure in the Legs Is Associated with Leg Edema and Lower Quality of Life in Healthy Volunteers.腿部低淋巴泵压与健康志愿者的腿部水肿及较低生活质量相关。
Lymphat Res Biol. 2015 Jun;13(2):154-9. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2014.0015.
5
Development and validation of the Lymphedema Symptom and Intensity Survey-Arm.淋巴水肿症状与严重程度调查量表-手臂版的开发与验证
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Oct;23(10):3103-12. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2684-y. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
6
Lymphedema Quality of Life Inventory (LyQLI)-Development and investigation of validity and reliability.淋巴水肿生活质量量表(LyQLI)的编制及其效度与信度研究
Qual Life Res. 2015 Feb;24(2):427-39. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0783-8. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
7
Functioning in lymphedema from the patients' perspective using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and health (ICF) as a reference.以国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)为参考,从患者角度探讨淋巴水肿的功能状况。
Acta Oncol. 2015 Mar;54(3):411-21. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.952389. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
8
Lymphoedema Functioning, Disability and Health Questionnaire for Lower Limb Lymphoedema (Lymph-ICF-LL): reliability and validity.下肢淋巴水肿功能、残疾和健康问卷(Lymph-ICF-LL):信度和效度。
Phys Ther. 2014 May;94(5):705-21. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130285. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
9
Systematic review of quality of life and patient reported outcomes in patients with oncologic related lower extremity lymphedema.肿瘤相关性下肢淋巴水肿患者生活质量及患者报告结局的系统评价
Lymphat Res Biol. 2013 Mar;11(1):14-9. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2012.0015.
10
Coding of meaningful concepts in lymphedema-specific questionnaires with the ICF.ICF 对淋巴水肿特定问卷中有意义概念的编码。
Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(25):2105-12. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.771710. Epub 2013 Mar 12.