Husson Olga, Vissers Pauline A J, Denollet Johan, Mols Floortje
CoRPS - Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic diseases, Department of Medical and clinical Psychology, Tilburg University , the Netherlands.
Acta Oncol. 2015 May;54(5):669-77. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.996663. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
Prospective studies in various cardiovascular populations show that Type D personality predicted impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and disease-specific health status. We examined the effect of negative affectivity (NA), social inhibition (SI) and their combined effect (Type D personality) on HRQoL and disease-specific health status among colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.
CRC patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2009, as registered in the Dutch population-based Eindhoven Cancer Registry, received questionnaires on Type D personality (DS14), HRQoL (EORTC QLQ-C30) and disease-specific health status (EORTC QLQ-CR38) in 2010, 2011 and 2012.
Response rates were 73% (n = 2625), 83% (n = 1643) and 82% (n = 1458), respectively. Analyses were done on those completing at least two questionnaires (n = 1735). Individuals with Type D (NA+/SI+; 19%) and high NA (NA+/SI-; 11%) reported a significantly worse HRQoL and disease-specific health status compared to NA-/SI+ and NA-/SI-. Differences were stable over time. Linear mixed effects models showed that Type Ds had a lower quality of life, cognitive and emotional functioning, more insomnia, diarrhea, gastrointestinal, defecation and stoma-related problems and poor body image and future perspective compared to the reference group (NA-/SI-), even after controlling for sociodemographic and clinical variables. High NA individuals (NA+/SI-) reported similar poor health outcomes as Type Ds. However, they also reported lower social functioning and more fatigue, pain, micturition- and financial problems, while Type Ds reported more constipation, sexual problems and less sexual enjoyment.
Type D personality and high NA both have a significant negative stable impact on HRQoL and disease-specific health status among CRC patients.
针对不同心血管疾病人群的前瞻性研究表明,D型人格预示着健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)受损以及特定疾病的健康状况不佳。我们研究了消极情感性(NA)、社交抑制(SI)及其联合效应(D型人格)对结直肠癌(CRC)患者HRQoL和特定疾病健康状况的影响。
2000年至2009年间在荷兰基于人群的埃因霍温癌症登记处登记诊断的CRC患者,于2010年、2011年和2012年收到了关于D型人格(DS14)、HRQoL(EORTC QLQ-C30)和特定疾病健康状况(EORTC QLQ-CR38)的问卷。
回复率分别为73%(n = 2625)、83%(n = 1643)和82%(n = 1458)。对至少完成两份问卷的患者(n = 1735)进行了分析。与NA-/SI+和NA-/SI-的个体相比,D型(NA+/SI+;19%)和高NA(NA+/SI-;11%)的个体报告的HRQoL和特定疾病健康状况明显更差。随着时间推移,差异保持稳定。线性混合效应模型显示,与参照组(NA-/SI-)相比,即使在控制了社会人口统计学和临床变量后,D型人格者的生活质量、认知和情感功能较低,有更多失眠、腹泻、胃肠道、排便和造口相关问题,以及较差的身体形象和未来展望。高NA个体(NA+/SI-)报告的健康结果与D型人格者相似。然而,他们还报告社交功能较低,有更多疲劳、疼痛、排尿和经济问题,而D型人格者报告便秘更多、性问题更多且性享受更少。
D型人格和高NA均对CRC患者的HRQoL和特定疾病健康状况产生显著的负面稳定影响。