Chalasani Naga, Bonkovsky Herbert L, Fontana Robert, Lee William, Stolz Andrew, Talwalkar Jayant, Reddy K Rajendar, Watkins Paul B, Navarro Victor, Barnhart Huiman, Gu Jiezhun, Serrano Jose
Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indianapolis.
Carolinas Health Care System, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Gastroenterology. 2015 Jun;148(7):1340-52.e7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.03.006. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network is conducting a prospective study of patients with DILI in the United States. We present characteristics and subgroup analyses from the first 1257 patients enrolled in the study.
In an observational longitudinal study, we began collecting data on eligible individuals with suspected DILI in 2004, following them for 6 months or longer. Subjects were evaluated systematically for other etiologies, causes, and severity of DILI.
Among 1257 enrolled subjects with suspected DILI, the causality was assessed in 1091 patients, and 899 were considered to have definite, highly likely, or probable DILI. Ten percent of patients died or underwent liver transplantation, and 17% had chronic liver injury. In the 89 patients (10%) with pre-existing liver disease, DILI appeared to be more severe than in those without (difference not statistically significant; P = .09) and mortality was significantly higher (16% vs 5.2%; P < .001). Azithromycin was the implicated agent in a higher proportion of patients with pre-existing liver disease compared with those without liver disease (6.7% vs 1.5%; P = .006). Forty-one cases with latency ≤7 days were caused predominantly by antimicrobial agents (71%). Two most common causes for 60 DILI cases with latency >365 days were nitrofurantoin (25%) or minocycline (17%). There were no differences in outcomes of patients with short vs long latency of DILI. Compared with individuals younger than 65 years, individuals 65 years or older (n = 149) were more likely to have cholestatic injury, although mortality and rate of liver transplantation did not differ. Nine patients (1%) had concomitant severe skin reactions; implicated agents were lamotrigine, azithromycin, carbamazepine, moxifloxacin, cephalexin, diclofenac, and nitrofurantoin. Four of these patients died.
Mortality from DILI is significantly higher in individuals with pre-existing liver disease or concomitant severe skin reactions compared with patients without. Additional studies are needed to confirm the association between azithromycin and increased DILI in patients with chronic liver disease. Older age and short or long latencies are not associated with DILI mortality.
药物性肝损伤网络正在美国对药物性肝损伤患者进行一项前瞻性研究。我们展示了该研究纳入的前1257例患者的特征及亚组分析结果。
在一项观察性纵向研究中,我们于2004年开始收集符合条件的疑似药物性肝损伤个体的数据,并对他们进行为期6个月或更长时间的随访。对受试者进行了关于药物性肝损伤的其他病因、起因及严重程度的系统评估。
在1257例纳入的疑似药物性肝损伤受试者中,对1091例患者评估了因果关系,其中899例被认为患有明确、极有可能或很可能的药物性肝损伤。10%的患者死亡或接受了肝移植,17%的患者有慢性肝损伤。在89例(10%)有基础肝病的患者中,药物性肝损伤似乎比无基础肝病的患者更严重(差异无统计学意义;P = 0.09),且死亡率显著更高(16%对5.2%;P < 0.001)。与无肝病的患者相比,阿奇霉素在有基础肝病的患者中涉及的比例更高(6.7%对1.5%;P = 0.006)。潜伏期≤7天的41例病例主要由抗菌药物引起(71%)。潜伏期>365天的60例药物性肝损伤病例的两个最常见病因是呋喃妥因(25%)或米诺环素(17%)。药物性肝损伤潜伏期短与长的患者的结局无差异。与65岁以下个体相比,65岁及以上个体(n = 149)更易发生胆汁淤积性损伤,尽管死亡率和肝移植率无差异。9例患者(1%)伴有严重皮肤反应;涉及的药物有拉莫三嗪、阿奇霉素、卡马西平、莫西沙星、头孢氨苄、双氯芬酸和呋喃妥因。其中4例患者死亡。
与无基础肝病或严重皮肤反应的患者相比,有基础肝病或伴有严重皮肤反应的个体因药物性肝损伤导致的死亡率显著更高。需要进一步研究来证实阿奇霉素与慢性肝病患者药物性肝损伤增加之间的关联。年龄较大以及潜伏期短或长与药物性肝损伤死亡率无关。