Tamura Jun, Itami Takaharu, Ishizuka Tomohito, Fukui Sho, Miyoshi Kenjirou, Sano Tadashi, Yamashita Kazuto
Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Rakuno Gakuen University, Ebetsu, Hokkaido 069-8501, Japan.
J Vet Med Sci. 2015 Jul;77(7):865-9. doi: 10.1292/jvms.14-0503. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
To determine the reference level of central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) and clinical efficacy of central venous blood gas analysis, partial pressures of oxygen and carbon dioxide, pH, oxygen saturation, base excess (B.E.) and HCO3 concentration were compared between simultaneously obtained central venous and arterial blood samples from conscious healthy 6 dogs and 5 cats. Comparisons between arteriovenous samples were performed by a paired t-test and Bland-Altman analysis. Between arteriovenous samples, B.E. showed good agreement, but there were significant differences in other parameters in the dogs, and no good agreement was detected in cats. The ScvO2 in dogs and cats were 82.3 ± 3.5 and 62.4 ± 13.5%, respectively. Central venous blood gas analysis is indispensable, especially in cats.
为确定中心静脉血氧饱和度(ScvO2)的参考水平及中心静脉血气分析的临床疗效,对6只清醒健康犬和5只猫同时采集的中心静脉血样和动脉血样进行比较,检测氧分压、二氧化碳分压、pH值、血氧饱和度、碱剩余(B.E.)和HCO3浓度。动静脉样本间的比较采用配对t检验和Bland-Altman分析。动静脉样本间,B.E.显示出良好的一致性,但犬的其他参数存在显著差异,猫则未检测到良好的一致性。犬和猫的ScvO2分别为82.3±3.5%和62.4±13.5%。中心静脉血气分析不可或缺,尤其是在猫中。