Jeong Dong-Hyuk, Yang Jeong-Jin, Lee Lyon, Yeon Seong-Chan
Species Restoration Technology Institute of Korea National Park Service, Gurye 542-853, Republic of Korea.
Laboratory of Veterinary Anesthesia and Pain Management, College of Veterinary Medicine, Western University, Pormona, CA 91766, U.S.A.
J Vet Med Sci. 2017 Oct 20;79(10):1757-1763. doi: 10.1292/jvms.16-0596. Epub 2017 Sep 10.
The objective of this study was to measure differences between arterial and venous blood gas parameters and to evaluate whether arterial blood gas values can be estimated from venous blood in Asiatic black bears (ABBs). Twelve healthy captive ABBs (8 males and 4 females; 8-16 years; 76.8-220 kg) were included in this study. The bears were immobilized with medetomidine and zolazepam-tiletamine using a dart gun. Arterial and venous samples were collected simultaneously at 5 and 35 min after recumbency (5- and 35-min points). Partial pressure of oxygen (PO), partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO), pH, bicarbonate (HCO), total carbon dioxide (TCO), oxygen saturation of hemoglobin (SO) and base excess (BEecf) were analyzed using a portable blood gas analyzer. There was no marked difference in measured and calculated variables over time in both venous and arterial blood except for PO. However, arterial PO, SO and pH were significantly higher and arterial PCO, TCO and HCO were lower than those of venous samples at both 5- and 35-min points. In the regression analysis to estimate arterial values from venous values, PCO, TCO, HCO, BEecf and pH significantly showed over 0.45 in coefficient of determination value (R), and there were little differences between actual and predicted arterial values. Although there were limits in venous gas values replaced those of arterial blood, if we could not get the arterial samples, the regression formulas for arterial values from venous blood in this study would be useful clinically, except for PO and SO.
本研究的目的是测量亚洲黑熊动脉血和静脉血气参数之间的差异,并评估是否可以根据静脉血估计动脉血气值。本研究纳入了12只健康圈养的亚洲黑熊(8只雄性和4只雌性;8 - 16岁;76.8 - 220千克)。使用麻醉枪用美托咪定和唑拉西泮 - 替来他明使熊麻醉。在卧倒后5分钟和35分钟(5分钟和35分钟时间点)同时采集动脉和静脉血样。使用便携式血气分析仪分析氧分压(PO)、二氧化碳分压(PCO)、pH值、碳酸氢盐(HCO)、总二氧化碳(TCO)、血红蛋白氧饱和度(SO)和碱剩余(BEecf)。除PO外,静脉血和动脉血中测量和计算的变量随时间均无明显差异。然而,在5分钟和35分钟时间点,动脉PO、SO和pH值均显著高于静脉血样本,而动脉PCO、TCO和HCO则低于静脉血样本。在根据静脉值估计动脉值的回归分析中,PCO、TCO、HCO、BEecf和pH的决定系数值(R)均显著超过0.45,实际动脉值与预测动脉值之间差异不大。尽管用静脉血气值替代动脉血气值存在局限性,但如果无法采集到动脉血样,本研究中根据静脉血估计动脉值的回归公式在临床上将是有用的,PO和SO除外。