Mundt Marlon P, Gilchrist Valerie J, Fleming Michael F, Zakletskaia Larissa I, Tuan Wen-Jan, Beasley John W
Department of Family Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
Department of Family Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.
Ann Fam Med. 2015 Mar;13(2):139-48. doi: 10.1370/afm.1754.
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity in the United States. Primary care teams can be best suited to improve quality of care and lower costs for patients with cardiovascular disease. This study evaluates the associations between primary care team communication, interaction, and coordination (ie, social networks); quality of care; and costs for patients with cardiovascular disease.
Using a sociometric survey, 155 health professionals from 31 teams at 6 primary care clinics identified with whom they interact daily about patient care. Social network analysis calculated variables of density and centralization representing team interaction structures. Three-level hierarchical modeling evaluated the link between team network density, centralization, and number of patients with a diagnosis of cardiovascular disease for controlled blood pressure and cholesterol, counts of urgent care visits, emergency department visits, hospital days, and medical care costs in the previous 12 months.
Teams with dense interactions among all team members were associated with fewer hospital days (rate ratio [RR] = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.50-0.77) and lower medical care costs (-$556; 95% CI, -$781 to -$331) for patients with cardiovascular disease. Conversely, teams with interactions revolving around a few central individuals were associated with increased hospital days (RR = 1.45; 95% CI, 1.09-1.94) and greater costs ($506; 95% CI, $202-$810). Team-shared vision about goals and expectations mediated the relationship between social network structures and patient quality of care outcomes.
Primary care teams that are more interconnected and less centralized and that have a shared team vision are better positioned to deliver high-quality cardiovascular disease care at a lower cost.
心血管疾病是美国死亡和发病的主要原因。初级保健团队最适合改善心血管疾病患者的护理质量并降低成本。本研究评估了初级保健团队沟通、互动和协调(即社会网络)之间的关联;护理质量;以及心血管疾病患者的成本。
通过社会计量调查,来自6家初级保健诊所31个团队的155名卫生专业人员确定了他们每天就患者护理与谁进行互动。社会网络分析计算了代表团队互动结构的密度和集中化变量。三级分层建模评估了团队网络密度、集中化与诊断为心血管疾病的患者数量之间的联系,这些患者的血压和胆固醇得到控制,紧急护理就诊次数、急诊就诊次数、住院天数以及过去12个月的医疗费用。
所有团队成员之间互动密集的团队,与心血管疾病患者的住院天数减少(率比[RR]=0.62;95%置信区间,0.50 - 0.77)和医疗费用降低(-$556;95%置信区间,-$781至-$331)相关。相反,互动围绕少数核心个体的团队,与住院天数增加(RR = 1.45;95%置信区间,1.09 - 1.94)和费用增加($506;95%置信区间,$202 - $810)相关。团队对目标和期望的共同愿景介导了社会网络结构与患者护理质量结果之间的关系。
联系更紧密、集权程度更低且有共同团队愿景的初级保健团队,更有能力以更低成本提供高质量的心血管疾病护理。