Mundt Marlon P, Zakletskaia Larissa I, Shoham David A, Tuan Wen-Jan, Carayon Pascale
Department of Family Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.
Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015 Oct;39(10):2003-15. doi: 10.1111/acer.12831. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
Identifying and engaging excessive alcohol users in primary care may be an effective way to improve patient health outcomes, reduce alcohol-related acute care events, and lower costs. Little is known about what structures of primary care team communication are associated with alcohol-related patient outcomes.
Using a sociometric survey of primary care clinic communication, this study evaluated the relation between team communication networks and alcohol-related utilization of care and costs. Between May 2013 and December 2013, a total of 155 healthcare employees at 6 primary care clinics participated in a survey on team communication. Three-level hierarchical modeling evaluated the link between connectedness within the care team and the number of alcohol-related emergency department visits, hospital days, and associated medical care costs in the past 12 months for each team's primary care patient panel.
Teams (n = 31) whose registered nurses displayed more strong (at least daily) face-to-face ties and strong (at least daily) electronic communication ties had 10% fewer alcohol-related hospital days (rate ratio [RR] = 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.84, 0.97). Furthermore, in an average team size of 19, each additional team member with strong interaction ties across the whole team was associated with $1,030 (95% CI: -$1,819, -$241) lower alcohol-related patient healthcare costs per 1,000 team patients in the past 12 months. Conversely, teams whose primary care practitioner (PCP) had more strong face-to-face communication ties and more weak (weekly or several times a week) electronic communication ties had 12% more alcohol-related hospital days (RR = 1.12; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.23) and $1,428 (95% CI: $378, $2,478) higher alcohol-related healthcare costs per 1,000 patients in the past 12 months. The analyses controlled for patient age, gender, insurance, and comorbidity diagnoses.
Excessive alcohol-using patients may fair better if cared for by teams whose face-to-face and electronic communication networks include more team members and whose communication to the PCP has been streamlined to fewer team members.
在初级保健中识别并促使过度饮酒者参与治疗,可能是改善患者健康状况、减少与酒精相关的急性护理事件并降低成本的有效方法。对于初级保健团队沟通的哪些结构与酒精相关的患者结局有关,我们知之甚少。
本研究通过对初级保健诊所沟通进行社会测量调查,评估团队沟通网络与酒精相关的医疗利用和成本之间的关系。2013年5月至2013年12月期间,6家初级保健诊所的155名医护人员参与了一项关于团队沟通的调查。三级分层模型评估了护理团队内部的连通性与每个团队初级保健患者群体在过去12个月内与酒精相关的急诊科就诊次数、住院天数及相关医疗费用之间的联系。
其注册护士表现出更多紧密(至少每日一次)的面对面联系和紧密(至少每日一次)的电子通信联系的团队(n = 31),与酒精相关的住院天数减少了10%(率比[RR] = 0.90;95%置信区间[CI]:0.84,0.97)。此外,在平均团队规模为19人的情况下,团队中每增加一名与整个团队有紧密互动联系的成员,过去12个月中每1000名团队患者与酒精相关的患者医疗费用就会降低1030美元(95% CI:-$1819,-$241)。相反,其初级保健医生(PCP)有更多紧密的面对面沟通联系和更多薄弱(每周或每周几次)的电子通信联系的团队,与酒精相关的住院天数增加了12%(RR = 1.12;95% CI:1.03,1.23),过去12个月中每1000名患者与酒精相关的医疗费用增加了1428美元(95% CI:378美元,2478美元)。分析对患者年龄、性别、保险和合并症诊断进行了控制。
如果由那些面对面和电子通信网络涵盖更多团队成员且与初级保健医生的沟通精简至较少团队成员的团队来照顾过度饮酒的患者,这些患者可能会有更好的治疗效果。