Suppr超能文献

三种复合树脂核修复材料在三种预制非金属桩上的抗折强度评估:一项体外研究。

An assessment of fracture resistance of three composite resin core build-up materials on three prefabricated non-metallic posts, cemented in endodontically treated teeth: an in vitro study.

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Dr. Harvansh Singh Judge Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Punjab University , Chandigarh , India.

Consultant Maxillofacial Prosthodontist & Implantologist , Barnala, Punjab , India.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2015 Feb 24;3:e795. doi: 10.7717/peerj.795. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Endodontically treated teeth with excessive loss of tooth structure would require to be restored with post and core to enhance the strength and durability of the tooth and to achieve retention for the restoration. The non-metallic posts have a superior aesthetic quality. Various core build-up materials can be used to build-up cores on the posts placed in endodontically treated teeth. These materials would show variation in their bonding with the non-metallic posts thus affecting the strength and resistance to fracture of the remaining tooth structure. Aims. The aim of the study was to assess the fracture resistance of three composite resin core build-up materials on three prefabricated non-metallic posts, cemented in extracted endodontically treated teeth. Material and Methods. Forty-five freshly extracted maxillary central incisors of approximately of the same size and shape were selected for the study. They were divided randomly into 3 groups of 15 each, depending on the types of non-metallic posts used. Each group was further divided into 3 groups (A, B and C) of 5 samples each depending on three core build-up material used. Student's unpaired 't' test was also used to analyse and compare each group with the other groups individually, and decide whether their comparisons were statistically significant. Results. Luxacore showed the highest fracture resistance among the three core build-up materials with all the three posts systems. Ti-core had intermediate values of fracture resistance and Lumiglass had the least values of fracture resistance.

摘要

根管治疗后的牙齿如果牙体结构严重缺失,则需要使用桩核来增强牙齿的强度和耐久性,并为修复体提供固位。非金属桩具有更好的美学质量。各种核修复材料可用于在根管治疗后的牙齿中放置的桩上进行核修复。这些材料与非金属桩的粘结性能会有所不同,从而影响剩余牙体结构的强度和抗折能力。目的:本研究旨在评估三种复合树脂核修复材料在三种预制非金属桩上对根管治疗后的牙齿的抗折能力。材料和方法:从 45 颗上颌中切牙中随机选择 45 颗,这些牙的大小和形状大致相同。它们被随机分为三组,每组 15 颗,具体取决于使用的非金属桩的类型。每组进一步分为三组(A、B 和 C),每组 5 个样本,具体取决于使用的三种核修复材料。学生的非配对 t 检验也用于分析和比较每组与其他组之间的差异,并确定它们的比较是否具有统计学意义。结果:在三种核修复材料中,Luxacore 在所有三种桩系统中表现出最高的抗折能力。Ti-core 的抗折能力居中,而 Lumiglass 的抗折能力最低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3062/4349048/99ce75ac3590/peerj-03-795-g001.jpg

相似文献

6
Effect of fiber posts on the fracture resistance of maxillary central incisors with Class III restorations: An in vitro study.
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Jul;118(1):55-60. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.013. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
7
Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber posts of different lengths.
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Jan;111(1):30-4. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.09.013. Epub 2013 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

2
Immediate and long-term microshear bond strength of resin-based cements to core build-up materials.
J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 Oct 1;13(10):e1030-e1037. doi: 10.4317/jced.58515. eCollection 2021 Oct.
3
Cleaning and Conditioning of Contaminated Core Build-Up Material before Adhesive Bonding.
Materials (Basel). 2020 Jun 26;13(12):2880. doi: 10.3390/ma13122880.

本文引用的文献

2
Resistance of three new esthetic post-and-core systems to compressive loading.
J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Feb;95(2):130-6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.11.013.
4
Effect of luting agents and reconstruction techniques on the fracture resistance of pre-fabricated post systems.
J Oral Rehabil. 2005 Jun;32(6):433-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01438.x.
9
Factors determining post selection: a literature review.
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Dec;90(6):556-62. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.09.006.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验