• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同材料充填的牙根抗折性

Resistance to fracture of dental roots obturated with different materials.

作者信息

Celikten Berkan, Uzuntas Ceren Feriha, Gulsahi Kamran

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Başkent University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:591031. doi: 10.1155/2015/591031. Epub 2015 Feb 8.

DOI:10.1155/2015/591031
PMID:25756048
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4337756/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the vertical fracture resistance of roots obturated with different root canal filling materials and sealers. Crowns of 55 extracted mandibular premolar teeth were removed to provide root lengths of 13 mm. Five roots were saved as negative control group (canals unprepared and unfilled). Fifty root canals were instrumented and then five roots were saved as positive control group (canals prepared but unfilled). The remaining 45 roots were randomly divided into three experimental groups (n = 15 root/group) and obturated with the following procedures: in group 1, glass ionomer-based sealer and cone (ActiV GP obturation system); in group 2, bioceramic sealer and cone (EndoSequence BC obturation system); and in group 3, roots were filled with bioceramic sealer and cone (Smartpaste bio obturation system). All specimens were tested in a universal testing machine for measuring fracture resistance. For each root, the force at the time of fracture was recorded in Newtons. The statistical analysis was performed by using Kruskal-Wallis and post hoc test. There were no significant differences between the three experimental groups. The fracture values of three experimental and negative control groups were significantly higher than the positive control group. Within the limitations of this study, all materials increased the fracture resistance of instrumented roots.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较用不同根管充填材料和封闭剂充填的牙根的垂直抗折性。去除55颗拔除的下颌前磨牙的牙冠,使牙根长度为13毫米。保留5个牙根作为阴性对照组(根管未预备和未充填)。对50个根管进行预备,然后保留5个牙根作为阳性对照组(根管已预备但未充填)。将其余45个牙根随机分为三个实验组(每组15个牙根),并按以下步骤进行充填:第1组,使用玻璃离子基封闭剂和牙胶尖(ActiV GP充填系统);第2组,使用生物陶瓷封闭剂和牙胶尖(EndoSequence BC充填系统);第3组,使用生物陶瓷封闭剂和牙胶尖(Smartpaste bio充填系统)。所有标本在万能试验机上进行测试以测量抗折性。对于每个牙根,记录骨折时的力,单位为牛顿。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和事后检验进行统计分析。三个实验组之间没有显著差异。三个实验组和阴性对照组的骨折值显著高于阳性对照组。在本研究的局限性内,所有材料均提高了预备后牙根的抗折性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0ac/4337756/003af2b2d573/BMRI2015-591031.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0ac/4337756/003af2b2d573/BMRI2015-591031.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0ac/4337756/003af2b2d573/BMRI2015-591031.001.jpg

相似文献

1
Resistance to fracture of dental roots obturated with different materials.不同材料充填的牙根抗折性
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:591031. doi: 10.1155/2015/591031. Epub 2015 Feb 8.
2
Resistance to fracture of roots obturated with novel canal-filling systems.新型根管充填系统修复后根管抗折性能的研究。
J Endod. 2011 Nov;37(11):1590-2. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.08.008. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
3
In vitro fracture resistance of roots obturated with epoxy resin-based, mineral trioxide aggregate-based, and bioceramic root canal sealers.采用环氧树脂类、三氧化矿物凝聚体类和生物陶瓷类根管封闭剂充填的牙根的体外抗折性。
J Endod. 2013 Dec;39(12):1630-3. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.07.034. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
4
Resistance to vertical root fracture of endodontically treated teeth with MetaSEAL.MetaSEAL 对根管治疗后牙齿抗垂直根折的效果。
J Endod. 2012 May;38(5):653-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.02.015. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
5
In vitro resistance to fracture of roots obturated with Resilon or gutta-percha.根管内用 Resilon 或牙胶尖封闭后的牙根体外抗折能力。
J Endod. 2011 Jun;37(6):828-31. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.024. Epub 2011 Apr 2.
6
The effect of two different root canal sealers and smear layer on resistance to root fracture.两种不同根管封闭剂及玷污层对牙根抗折性的影响
J Endod. 2002 Aug;28(8):606-9. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200208000-00011.
7
Fracture resistance of roots using different canal filling systems.使用不同根管充填系统时牙根的抗折性。
Int Endod J. 2009 Aug;42(8):705-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01571.x. Epub 2009 May 8.
8
A comparison of root fracture resistance using two root canal sealers.使用两种根管封闭剂对牙根抗折性的比较。
Int Endod J. 1999 Sep;32(5):376-80. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00240.x.
9
Evaluation of the effect of different root canal obturation techniques using two root canal sealers on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots.使用两种根管封闭剂评估不同根管充填技术对根管治疗后牙根抗折性的影响。
Microsc Res Tech. 2015 May;78(5):404-7. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22487. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
10
Vertical fracture resistance of roots after ultrasonic removal of fractured instruments.超声取出折断器械后根管的抗垂直折裂能力。
Int Endod J. 2010 May;43(5):424-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01698.x.

引用本文的文献

1
comparison of bioceramic and silicone-based root canal sealers with different obturation technique.不同充填技术下生物陶瓷和硅基根管封闭剂的比较
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Jun;28(6):527-531. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_175_25. Epub 2025 Jun 2.
2
The impact of the filling technique with two sealers in bulk or associated with gutta-percha on the fatigue behavior and failure patterns of endodontically treated teeth.两种根管封闭剂(或联合牙胶)的侧向加压充填技术对根管治疗后牙疲劳性能和破坏模式的影响。
PeerJ. 2024 Oct 28;12:e18221. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18221. eCollection 2024.
3
In vitro evaluation of the impact of a bioceramic root canal sealer on the mechanical properties of tooth roots.

本文引用的文献

1
In vitro fracture resistance of roots obturated with epoxy resin-based, mineral trioxide aggregate-based, and bioceramic root canal sealers.采用环氧树脂类、三氧化矿物凝聚体类和生物陶瓷类根管封闭剂充填的牙根的体外抗折性。
J Endod. 2013 Dec;39(12):1630-3. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.07.034. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
2
Effect of phosphate-buffered saline on push-out bond strength of a new bioceramic sealer to root canal dentin.磷酸盐缓冲盐水对一种新型生物陶瓷封闭剂与根管牙本质之间推出粘结强度的影响。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2012 Sep;9(5):595-9. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.104879.
3
Resistance to fracture of roots filled with different sealers.
生物陶瓷根管封闭剂对牙根力学性能影响的体外评价
J Dent Sci. 2024 Jul;19(3):1734-1740. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2023.10.013. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
4
Root Fracture Resistance of Maxillary Premolars Obturated with Three Root Canal Sealers after Passive Utrasonic Irrigation: An study.被动超声冲洗后用三种根管封闭剂充填的上颌前磨牙的牙根抗折性:一项研究。
Iran Endod J. 2020 Summer;15(3):166-172. doi: 10.22037/iej.v15i3.26426.
5
Effect of a bioactive glass-based root canal sealer on root fracture resistance ability.一种基于生物活性玻璃的根管封闭剂对牙根抗折能力的影响。
J Dent Sci. 2023 Jan;18(1):27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2022.08.004. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
6
Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with FiberSite Postsystem and Glass Fiber, Combined with Different Root Canal Sealers.纤维桩系统(FiberSite Postsystem)和玻璃纤维增强复合材料(Fiber Glass)联合不同根管封闭剂修复的根管治疗后牙抗折性能的比较。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Oct 23;2021:3818652. doi: 10.1155/2021/3818652. eCollection 2021.
7
Fracture Resistance of Titanium, Chrome-Cobalt, and Gold Alloy as Post and Core Materials: A Comparative Evaluation.钛、铬钴合金和金合金作为桩核材料的抗折性能:一项比较评估
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2020 Aug;12(Suppl 1):S583-S588. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_205_20. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
8
Endodontic sealers based on calcium silicates: a systematic review.基于硅酸钙的牙胶密封剂:系统评价。
Odontology. 2019 Oct;107(4):421-436. doi: 10.1007/s10266-018-0400-3. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
9
Effect of root canal sealers on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of in vitro studies.根管封闭剂对根管治疗后牙抗折性能的影响:体外研究的系统评价。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Sep;22(7):2475-2485. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2540-9. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
10
Fracture Resistance of Roots after Application of Different Sealers.不同封闭剂应用后牙根的抗折性
Iran Endod J. 2017 Winter;12(1):50-54. doi: 10.22037/iej.2017.10.
不同封闭剂填充根管的抗折性能。
Dent Mater J. 2012;31(4):528-32.
4
Resistance to fracture of roots obturated with novel canal-filling systems.新型根管充填系统修复后根管抗折性能的研究。
J Endod. 2011 Nov;37(11):1590-2. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.08.008. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
5
Effect of low-surface-tension EDTA solutions on the wettability of root canal dentin.低表面张力乙二胺四乙酸溶液对根管牙本质润湿性的影响。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Jan;111(1):109-14. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.08.008.
6
Effect of sealers on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth with and without smear layer removal: An in vitro study.
J Conserv Dent. 2009 Jul;12(3):114-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.57635.
7
Effect of different intraorifice barriers on the fracture resistance of roots obturated with Resilon or gutta-percha.不同内孔屏障对 Resilon 或牙胶根充后抗折力的影响。
J Endod. 2010 Jun;36(6):1061-3. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.006. Epub 2010 Apr 9.
8
Differential aggressiveness of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid in causing canal wall erosion in the presence of sodium hypochlorite.乙二胺四乙酸在次氯酸钠存在下引起根管壁侵蚀的差异侵蚀性。
J Dent. 2010 Mar;38(3):201-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.10.004. Epub 2009 Oct 21.
9
Fracture resistance of roots using different canal filling systems.使用不同根管充填系统时牙根的抗折性。
Int Endod J. 2009 Aug;42(8):705-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01571.x. Epub 2009 May 8.
10
The effect of different irrigating solutions on bond strength of two root canal-filling systems.不同冲洗液对两种根管充填系统粘结强度的影响。
J Endod. 2009 Apr;35(4):537-40. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.01.003. Epub 2009 Feb 26.