• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

纤维桩系统(FiberSite Postsystem)和玻璃纤维增强复合材料(Fiber Glass)联合不同根管封闭剂修复的根管治疗后牙抗折性能的比较。

Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with FiberSite Postsystem and Glass Fiber, Combined with Different Root Canal Sealers.

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2021 Oct 23;2021:3818652. doi: 10.1155/2021/3818652. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1155/2021/3818652
PMID:34725637
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8556980/
Abstract

This study is aimed at evaluating the effects of FiberSite and glass fiber postsystems on the fracture resistance of endodontically restored teeth, when combined with various root canal sealers. Forty human mandibular premolar teeth, each having a single root with anatomically comparable dimension and length, were selected. The teeth in each experimental group ( = 10) were instrumented, obturated, and restored with the following procedures: in group 1, AH Plus root canal sealer and a glass fiber post with a composite core; in group 2, AH Plus root canal sealer and a FiberSite postsystem; in group 3, Sure-Seal Root canal sealer and a glass fiber post with a composite core; and in group 4, Sure-Seal Root canal sealer and a FiberSite postsystem. The specimens were placed on a universal test machine. The fracture resistance of all specimens was tested using generic test equipment, and the value of the force in newton (N) during fracture was measured for each root. A statistical analysis was conducted through the Kruskal-Wallis test as well as the post hoc test. The tests showed a significant difference between groups 2 and 3, with group 3 producing load values that were significantly higher than group 2. In contrast, no significant differences were found to exist between the other groups. Regardless of postsystems, groups 3 and 4 showed higher mean fracture values (but no statistically significant differences) than groups 1 and 2.

摘要

本研究旨在评估 FiberSite 纤维桩和玻璃纤维桩系统与不同根管封闭剂联合应用于根管治疗后的牙齿抗折裂性能。选取 40 颗具有相同解剖形态、相似尺寸和长度的下颌前磨牙。每组(n=10)按照以下步骤进行操作:第 1 组使用 AH Plus 根管封闭剂和复合核玻璃纤维桩;第 2 组使用 AH Plus 根管封闭剂和 FiberSite 纤维桩系统;第 3 组使用 Sure-Seal 根管封闭剂和复合核玻璃纤维桩;第 4 组使用 Sure-Seal 根管封闭剂和 FiberSite 纤维桩系统。将样本置于万能试验机上,使用通用测试设备测试所有样本的抗折裂性能,记录每个牙根在断裂时的牛顿(N)力值。采用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验和事后检验对数据进行统计学分析。结果显示,第 2 组和第 3 组之间存在显著差异,第 3 组的负载值明显高于第 2 组。而其他组之间则无显著差异。无论使用哪种桩系统,第 3 组和第 4 组的平均断裂值均高于第 1 组和第 2 组(但无统计学差异)。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with FiberSite Postsystem and Glass Fiber, Combined with Different Root Canal Sealers.纤维桩系统(FiberSite Postsystem)和玻璃纤维增强复合材料(Fiber Glass)联合不同根管封闭剂修复的根管治疗后牙抗折性能的比较。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Oct 23;2021:3818652. doi: 10.1155/2021/3818652. eCollection 2021.
2
Comparative evaluation of the fracture resistances of endodontically treated teeth filled using five different root canal filling systems.使用五种不同根管充填系统对根管治疗后牙齿的抗折性进行比较评估。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2014 Nov-Dec;17(6):667-72. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.144375.
3
Fracture Resistance of Roots Filled With Bio-Ceramic and Epoxy Resin-Based Sealers: Study.生物陶瓷和环氧树脂基密封剂填充根管的抗折裂性能:研究。
Eur Endod J. 2020 May 28;5(2):134-137. doi: 10.14744/eej.2019.33042. eCollection 2020.
4
Comparative evaluation of the fracture resistance of teeth prepared with rotary system, filled with single cone gutta-percha and laterally condensed with zinc oxide eugenol and resin based (AH26) sealers to that of Resilon.对使用旋转系统制备、填充单锥牙胶并使用氧化锌丁香酚和树脂基(AH26)封闭剂进行侧向加压充填的牙齿与Resilon的抗折性进行比较评估。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012 Nov 1;13(6):773-81. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1228.
5
Evaluation of resistance of teeth subjected to fracture after endodontic treatment using different root canal sealers: an in vitro study.使用不同根管封闭剂对根管治疗后牙齿抗折性的评估:一项体外研究。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2012 Oct-Dec;30(4):305-9. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.108926.
6
Resistance to vertical root fracture of endodontically treated teeth with MetaSEAL.MetaSEAL 对根管治疗后牙齿抗垂直根折的效果。
J Endod. 2012 May;38(5):653-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.02.015. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
7
Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Obturated with Different Root Canal Sealers (A Comparative Study).使用不同根管封闭剂充填的根管治疗后牙齿的抗折性(一项对比研究)
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 May 1;21(5):490-493.
8
In vitro fracture resistance of roots obturated with epoxy resin-based, mineral trioxide aggregate-based, and bioceramic root canal sealers.采用环氧树脂类、三氧化矿物凝聚体类和生物陶瓷类根管封闭剂充填的牙根的体外抗折性。
J Endod. 2013 Dec;39(12):1630-3. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.07.034. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
9
A comparative evaluation of the vertical root fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth using different root canal sealers: an in vitro study.使用不同根管封闭剂对根管治疗后牙齿垂直根折抗力的比较评估:一项体外研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012 May 1;13(3):351-5. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1150.
10
Root canal filling: fracture strength of fiber-reinforced composite-restored roots and finite element analysis.根管充填:纤维增强复合材料修复牙根的抗折强度及有限元分析
Braz Dent J. 2013 Nov-Dec;24(6):619-25. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201301996.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of obturation techniques on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.根管充填技术对根管治疗后牙齿抗折性的影响。
Bioinformation. 2025 Mar 31;21(3):361-364. doi: 10.6026/973206300210361. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Could different direct restoration techniques affect interfacial gap and fracture resistance of endodontically treated anterior teeth?不同的直接修复技术会影响根管治疗后的前牙的界面间隙和抗折裂性能吗?
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Oct;25(10):5967-5975. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03902-y. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
2
A Novel Polyurethane Expandable Root Canal Sealer.一种新型聚氨酯可膨胀根管封闭剂。
J Endod. 2021 Apr;47(4):612-620. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.12.007. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
3
Fracture Resistance of Roots Filled With Bio-Ceramic and Epoxy Resin-Based Sealers: Study.生物陶瓷和环氧树脂基密封剂填充根管的抗折裂性能:研究。
Eur Endod J. 2020 May 28;5(2):134-137. doi: 10.14744/eej.2019.33042. eCollection 2020.
4
Fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth restored with different fiber post and core systems.不同纤维桩核系统修复后牙体牙髓治疗牙的抗折强度。
Odontology. 2020 Oct;108(4):588-595. doi: 10.1007/s10266-020-00481-4. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
5
Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Biodentine, Resin Modified GIC and Hybrid Composite Resin as a Core Material.以生物陶瓷、树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀和混合复合树脂作为核心材料对根管治疗后的牙齿进行修复的抗折性能。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Sep;11(9):ZC68-ZC70. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/28263.10625. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
6
Effects of fiber-glass-reinforced composite restorations on fracture resistance and failure mode of endodontically treated molars.纤维增强复合材料修复对根管治疗后磨牙抗折性能和失败模式的影响。
J Dent. 2016 Oct;53:82-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
7
The effect of a fiber reinforced cavity configuration on load bearing capacity and failure mode of endodontically treated molars restored with CAD/CAM resin composite overlay restorations.纤维增强洞形结构对采用CAD/CAM树脂复合材料覆盖修复体修复的根管治疗后磨牙的承载能力和失效模式的影响。
J Dent. 2015 Sep;43(9):1106-1115. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.06.012. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
8
Resistance to fracture of dental roots obturated with different materials.不同材料充填的牙根抗折性
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:591031. doi: 10.1155/2015/591031. Epub 2015 Feb 8.
9
Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of root dentin to resin sealers and a MTA sealer: An in vitro study.牙根牙本质对树脂封闭剂和一种MTA封闭剂的抗折性比较评价:一项体外研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2014 Jan;17(1):53-6. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.124140.
10
In vitro fracture resistance of roots obturated with epoxy resin-based, mineral trioxide aggregate-based, and bioceramic root canal sealers.采用环氧树脂类、三氧化矿物凝聚体类和生物陶瓷类根管封闭剂充填的牙根的体外抗折性。
J Endod. 2013 Dec;39(12):1630-3. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.07.034. Epub 2013 Sep 5.