Jalovaara P, Puranen J
Department of Surgery, University of Oulu, Finland.
J Hosp Infect. 1989 Nov;14(4):333-8. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(89)90073-x.
Air bacterial and particle counts were obtained in a conventionally ventilated operating theatre, during 8 operations for total hip replacement performed using synthetic non-woven fabrics as drapes for the patients and gowns for the staff (trousers and stockings were of conventional cotton material), ('non-woven' group), and in 8 corresponding operations using conventional cotton fabrics ('cotton' group). No significant difference between the groups with regard to air bacterial counts was observed. The use of cotton fabrics was associated with substantially higher particle counts, probably due to particles from the cotton textiles themselves. No significant correlation was observed between the bacterial and particle counts, indicating that these came from different sources and that the particles were mainly of sterile origin. Thus, the benefit of the synthetic, non-woven fabrics in hip replacement surgery, when these fabrics are used to cover theatre staff only partially in the form of gowns, seems questionable with regard to the reduction of air bacterial counts. On the other hand, the surgical textiles of non-woven material improve the purity of the operating theatre since unlike cotton fabrics they do not produce and disperse particles in the air.
在一个传统通风的手术室中,对8例全髋关节置换手术进行了空气细菌和颗粒计数。手术中使用合成无纺布作为患者的手术单和工作人员的手术衣(裤子和长袜为传统棉质材料)(“无纺布”组),并在8例相应手术中使用传统棉质织物(“棉质”组)。两组之间在空气细菌计数方面未观察到显著差异。使用棉质织物与显著更高的颗粒计数相关,这可能是由于棉质纺织品本身产生的颗粒。细菌计数和颗粒计数之间未观察到显著相关性,表明它们来自不同来源,并且颗粒主要是无菌来源。因此,在髋关节置换手术中,当这些合成无纺布仅以手术衣的形式部分覆盖手术室工作人员时,其在减少空气细菌计数方面的益处似乎值得怀疑。另一方面,无纺布材料的手术纺织品提高了手术室的洁净度,因为与棉质织物不同,它们不会在空气中产生和散布颗粒。