Jones Sarah, Sloan David, Evans Hannah E R, Williams Sian
Health and Work Development Unit, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2015 Aug;21(4):567-71. doi: 10.1111/jep.12331. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: There is evidence that health and well-being of the National Health Service (NHS) workforce affects organizational and patient outcomes. A Cochrane review of the effectiveness of clinical audit to improve quality of care has shown great variation between studies, depending on the design and intensity of support offered. This study evaluates the effectiveness of an organizational audit methodology with (1) action-planning workshops and follow-up and (2) audit feedback alone, to support the implementation of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) workplace guidance.
Two rounds of audit using a self-administered online questionnaire were conducted. An overall implementation score was devised for each trust. Following round 1, interviews were conducted with a cohort of trusts with high scores. The interviews used a theory-based framework to identify predictors of and barriers to successful implementation. From this, the content for action-planning workshops was devised and workshops held with lower scoring trusts. The remaining trusts received only written feedback on their audit results. Changes in the implementation score between rounds 1 and 2 were compared within and between cohorts.
The median improvement in scores between rounds 1 and 2 was statistically significant except where baseline score was high. The improvement for trusts who received workshops was very much better than those who did not (P < 0.001). This difference remained after adjustment using stratification by baseline score (P = 0.001).
Audit, combined with action-planning workshops and follow-up, appears to be more effective in improving implementation of NICE workplace health and well-being guidance than audit with feedback alone.
理由、目的和目标:有证据表明,国民保健服务体系(NHS)工作人员的健康和福祉会影响组织和患者的治疗结果。Cochrane对临床审计改善医疗质量有效性的综述显示,不同研究之间存在很大差异,这取决于所提供支持的设计和强度。本研究评估一种组织审计方法的有效性,该方法包括(1)行动计划研讨会及后续跟进,以及(2)仅审计反馈,以支持国家卫生与保健优化研究所(NICE)工作场所指南的实施。
使用自行管理的在线问卷进行两轮审计。为每个信托机构设计了一个总体实施得分。在第一轮审计之后,对得分较高的一组信托机构进行了访谈。访谈采用基于理论的框架来确定成功实施的预测因素和障碍。据此,设计了行动计划研讨会的内容,并与得分较低的信托机构举办了研讨会。其余信托机构仅收到关于其审计结果的书面反馈。比较了各轮次之间以及不同群组之间第一轮和第二轮实施得分的变化。
除基线得分较高的情况外,第一轮和第二轮得分的中位数改善具有统计学意义。参加研讨会的信托机构的改善情况比未参加的信托机构好得多(P < 0.001)。在按基线得分分层进行调整后,这种差异仍然存在(P = 0.001)。
与仅提供反馈的审计相比,审计结合行动计划研讨会及后续跟进,在改善NICE工作场所健康与福祉指南的实施方面似乎更有效。