Suppr超能文献

用于鱼类肠道微生物群分析的DNA提取方案比较

Comparison of DNA extraction protocols for the analysis of gut microbiota in fishes.

作者信息

Larsen Andrea M, Mohammed Haitham H, Arias Covadonga R

机构信息

Aquatic Microbiology Laboratory, School of Fisheries, Aquaculture, and Aquatic Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.

Aquatic Microbiology Laboratory, School of Fisheries, Aquaculture, and Aquatic Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA

出版信息

FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2015 Mar;362(5). doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnu031. Epub 2014 Dec 4.

Abstract

This study investigated the impacts of bacterial DNA extraction methodology on downstream analysis of fish gut microbiota. Feces and intestine samples were taken from three sympatric freshwater fish species with varying diets. Samples were processed immediately (approximately 4 h after capture; fresh), stored at -20 °C for 15 days or preserved in RNAlater® reagent for 15 days. DNA was then extracted using two commercial kits: one designed for animal tissues and one specifically formulated for stool samples. Microbial community fingerprints were generated using ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis. Factors including diversity as depicted by band number, band intensity, repeatability and practicalities such as cost and time were considered. Despite significant differences in microbiota structure, results were similar between feces and intestine samples. Frozen samples were consistently outperformed by other storage methods and the stool kit typically outperformed the tissue kit. Overall, we recommend extraction of bacterial DNA from fresh samples using the stool kit for both sample types. If samples cannot be processed immediately, preservation in RNAlater® is preferred to freezing. Choice of DNA extraction method significantly influences the results of downstream microbial community analysis and thus should be taken into consideration for metadata analysis.

摘要

本研究调查了细菌DNA提取方法对鱼类肠道微生物群下游分析的影响。从三种具有不同食性的同域淡水鱼物种采集粪便和肠道样本。样本立即进行处理(捕获后约4小时;新鲜样本),在-20°C下储存15天或在RNAlater®试剂中保存15天。然后使用两种商业试剂盒提取DNA:一种专为动物组织设计,另一种专为粪便样本特制。使用核糖体基因间隔区分析生成微生物群落指纹图谱。考虑了包括条带数量、条带强度所描述的多样性、重复性以及成本和时间等实用性等因素。尽管微生物群结构存在显著差异,但粪便和肠道样本的结果相似。冷冻样本的表现始终不如其他储存方法,粪便试剂盒的表现通常优于组织试剂盒。总体而言,我们建议对两种样本类型均使用粪便试剂盒从新鲜样本中提取细菌DNA。如果样本不能立即处理,首选在RNAlater®中保存而非冷冻。DNA提取方法的选择会显著影响下游微生物群落分析的结果,因此在元数据分析中应予以考虑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验