Suppr超能文献

用于蚯蚓肠道微生物多样性分析的样本保存及DNA提取方法

Field preservation and DNA extraction methods for intestinal microbial diversity analysis in earthworms.

作者信息

Thakuria Dwipendra, Schmidt Olaf, Liliensiek Ann-Kathrin, Egan Damian, Doohan Fiona M

机构信息

Science Education and Research Centre (West), UCD School of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.

出版信息

J Microbiol Methods. 2009 Mar;76(3):226-33. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2008.10.015. Epub 2008 Nov 11.

Abstract

We assessed the effect of DNA extraction and sample preservation methods on the DNA yield and quality obtained from earthworm (Aporrectodea caliginosa Savigny) gut samples and on the results obtained by bacterial and fungal automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA) of DNA extracts. Methods based on a hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide dithiotreitol (CTAB-DTT) extraction buffer yielded more favourable results than those based on a sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) buffer. For both of these buffers, incorporation of a bead-beating during the lysis step increased the ARISA-derived bacterial ribotype numbers and diversity estimates, as determined for gut wall samples (P<0.01). Although spectrophotometric analysis indicated that DNA extracted by the CTAB-DTT and SDS-based methods were of comparable quality (P> or =0.05), the former method yielded >1.5 times more DNA from both gut contents and gut walls of earthworms than the latter method (both incorporating the bead beating step) (P<0.01). ARISA analysis detected more reproducible ribotypes and more microbial diversity in DNA extracted by the CTAB-DTT- as compared to the SDS-based method (P<0.01). Significant difference between bacterial communities of gut contents and gut walls were detected within DNA extracted by the CTAB-DTT (but not by the SDS-based) method (Global R=0.76, P<0.001, analysis of similarity). Using the CTAB-DTT-based method, we showed that earthworm preservation in ethanol yielded higher quality DNA from gut contents than preservation in either chloroform or liquid N, as determined by spectrophotometry, PCR inhibition analysis and bacterial and fungal ARISA (P<0.05). Bacterial or fungal communities in the gut contents of fresh and ethanol-preserved earthworms were more similar and were significantly different from those of earthworms preserved in chloroform or liquid N (Global R=0.79 and 0.83 for bacteria and fungi, respectively; P<0.001, analysis of similarity). We propose that ethanol preservation and the CTAB-DTT-based DNA extraction method described herein are also suitable for the analysis of gut-associated microbiota in other soil and sediment feeding invertebrates.

摘要

我们评估了DNA提取和样品保存方法对从蚯蚓(Aporrectodea caliginosa Savigny)肠道样品中获得的DNA产量和质量的影响,以及对DNA提取物进行细菌和真菌自动核糖体基因间隔区分析(ARISA)所得到的结果的影响。基于十六烷基三甲基溴化铵二硫苏糖醇(CTAB-DTT)提取缓冲液的方法比基于十二烷基硫酸钠(SDS)缓冲液的方法产生了更有利的结果。对于这两种缓冲液,在裂解步骤中加入珠磨法可增加从肠壁样品中确定的ARISA衍生细菌核糖体类型数量和多样性估计值(P<0.01)。虽然分光光度分析表明,用CTAB-DTT法和基于SDS的方法提取的DNA质量相当(P≥0.05),但前一种方法从蚯蚓的肠道内容物和肠壁中获得的DNA比后一种方法(均包含珠磨步骤)多1.5倍以上(P<0.01)。与基于SDS的方法相比,ARISA分析在CTAB-DTT提取的DNA中检测到更多可重复的核糖体类型和更多的微生物多样性(P<0.01)。在CTAB-DTT法(而非基于SDS的方法)提取的DNA中检测到肠道内容物和肠壁细菌群落之间存在显著差异(全局R=0.76,P<0.001,相似性分析)。使用基于CTAB-DTT的方法,我们发现,通过分光光度法、PCR抑制分析以及细菌和真菌ARISA测定,将蚯蚓保存在乙醇中比保存在氯仿或液氮中能从肠道内容物中获得更高质量的DNA(P<0.05)。新鲜和乙醇保存的蚯蚓肠道内容物中的细菌或真菌群落更相似,并且与氯仿或液氮保存的蚯蚓的细菌或真菌群落有显著差异(细菌和真菌的全局R分别为0.79和0.83;P<0.001,相似性分析)。我们提出,本文所述的乙醇保存法和基于CTAB-DTT的DNA提取方法也适用于分析其他以土壤和沉积物为食的无脊椎动物肠道相关微生物群。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验