Scottish Oceans Institute, Gatty Marine Laboratory, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 8LB, UK.
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, 99775, USA.
BMC Microbiol. 2021 Nov 10;21(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s12866-021-02374-0.
Understanding the influence of methodology on results is an essential consideration in experimental design. In the expanding field of fish microbiology, many best practices and targeted techniques remain to be refined. This study aimed to compare microbial assemblages obtained from Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) gills by swabbing versus biopsy excision. Results demonstrate the variation introduced by altered sampling strategies and enhance the available knowledge of the fish gill microbiome.
The microbiome was sampled using swabs and biopsies from fish gills, with identical treatment of samples for 16S next generation Illumina sequencing. Results show a clear divergence in microbial communities obtained through the different sampling strategies, with swabbing consistently isolating a more diverse microbial consortia, and suffering less from the technical issue of host DNA contamination associated with biopsy use. Sequencing results from biopsy-derived extractions, however, hint at the potential for more cryptic localisation of some community members.
Overall, results demonstrate a divergence in the obtained microbial community when different sampling methodology is used. Swabbing appears a superior method for sampling the microbiota of mucosal surfaces for broad ecological research in fish, whilst biopsies might be best applied in exploration of communities beyond the reach of swabs, such as sub-surface and intracellular microbes, as well as in pathogen diagnosis. Most studies on the external microbial communities of aquatic organisms utilise swabbing for sample collection, likely due to convenience. Much of the ultrastructure of gill tissue in live fish is, however, potentially inaccessible to swabbing, meaning swabbing might fail to capture the full diversity of gill microbiota. This work therefore also provides valuable insight into partitioning of the gill microbiota, informing varied applications of different sampling methods in experimental design for future research.
在实验设计中,了解方法对结果的影响是一个至关重要的考虑因素。在鱼类微生物学这个不断发展的领域中,许多最佳实践和针对性技术仍有待完善。本研究旨在比较通过拭子和活检切除从大西洋鲑鱼(Salmo salar)鳃中获得的微生物群落。结果表明,改变采样策略会引入变异,并增强对鱼类鳃微生物组的现有认识。
使用拭子和活检从鱼类鳃中采样,对 16S 下一代 Illumina 测序的样本进行相同的处理。结果表明,通过不同的采样策略获得的微生物群落存在明显差异,拭子始终能分离出更多样化的微生物群落,而且受活检使用相关的宿主 DNA 污染的技术问题影响较小。然而,从活检衍生的提取物中获得的测序结果表明,一些群落成员可能存在更隐蔽的本地化。
总体而言,当使用不同的采样方法时,结果表明获得的微生物群落存在差异。拭子似乎是用于鱼类广泛生态研究中黏膜表面微生物群采样的更好方法,而活检可能更适用于拭子无法触及的群落的探索,例如亚表面和细胞内微生物,以及病原体诊断。大多数关于水生生物外部微生物群落的研究都使用拭子进行样本采集,这可能是由于便利性。然而,活鱼鳃组织的大部分超微结构可能无法被拭子触及,这意味着拭子可能无法捕获完整的鳃微生物组多样性。因此,这项工作还为鳃微生物群的分区提供了有价值的见解,为未来研究的实验设计中不同采样方法的应用提供了信息。