Suppr超能文献

金属对金属髋关节表面置换术后并发症发生率是否因性别而异?一项系统评价。

Do Complication Rates Differ by Gender After Metal-on-metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Haughom Bryan D, Erickson Brandon J, Hellman Michael D, Jacobs Joshua J

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W Harrison Street, Suite 200, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA,

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Aug;473(8):2521-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4227-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although metal-on-metal (MoM) bearing surfaces provide low rates of volumetric wear and increased stability, evidence suggests that certain MoM hip arthroplasties have high rates of complication and failure. Some evidence indicates that women have higher rates of failure compared with men; however, the orthopaedic literature as a whole has poorly reported such complications stratified by gender.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: This systematic review aimed to: (1) compare the rate of adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR); (2) dislocation; (3) aseptic loosening; and (4) revision between men and women undergoing primary MoM hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA).

METHODS

Systematic MEDLINE and EMBASE searches identified all level I to III articles published in peer-reviewed journals, reporting on the outcomes of interest, for MoM HRA. Articles were limited to those with 2-year followup that reported outcomes by gender. Ten articles met inclusion criteria. Study quality was evaluated using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score; the overall quality was poor. Heterogeneity and bias were analyzed using a Mantel-Haenszel statistical method.

RESULTS

Women demonstrated an increased odds of developing ALTR (odds ratio [OR], 5.70 [2.71-11.98]; p<0.001), dislocation (OR, 3.04 [1.2-7.5], p=0.02), aseptic loosening (OR, 3.18 [2.21-4.58], p<0.001), and revision (OR, 2.50 [2.25-2.78], p<0.001) after primary MoM HRA.

CONCLUSIONS

A systematic review of the currently available literature reveals a higher rate of complications (ALTR, dislocation, aseptic loosening, and revision) after MoM HRA in women compared with men. Although femoral head size has been frequently implicated as a prime factor in the higher rate of complication in women, further research is necessary to specifically probe this relationship. Retrospective studies of data available (eg, registry data) should be undertaken, and moving forward studies should report outcomes by gender (particularly complications).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

摘要

背景

尽管金属对金属(MoM)关节面磨损率低且稳定性增加,但有证据表明某些MoM髋关节置换术并发症和失败率较高。一些证据表明,与男性相比,女性的失败率更高;然而,骨科文献整体上对按性别分层的此类并发症报道甚少。

问题/目的:本系统评价旨在:(1)比较初次MoM髋关节表面置换术(HRA)的男性和女性之间的局部组织不良反应(ALTR)发生率;(2)脱位发生率;(3)无菌性松动发生率;(4)翻修率。

方法

通过对MEDLINE和EMBASE进行系统检索,确定了发表在同行评审期刊上的所有I至III级文章,这些文章报道了MoM HRA的相关结局。文章限于那些随访2年且按性别报告结局的研究。10篇文章符合纳入标准。采用改良科尔曼方法评分评估研究质量;总体质量较差。使用Mantel-Haenszel统计方法分析异质性和偏倚。

结果

初次MoM HRA后,女性发生ALTR(优势比[OR],5.70[2.71 - 11.98];p<0.001)、脱位(OR,3.04[1.2 - 7.5],p = 0.02)、无菌性松动(OR,3.18[2.21 - 4.58],p<0.001)和翻修(OR,2.50[2.25 - 2.78],p<0.001)的几率增加。

结论

对现有文献的系统评价显示,与男性相比,女性在MoM HRA后并发症(ALTR、脱位、无菌性松动和翻修)发生率更高。尽管股骨头大小常被认为是女性并发症发生率较高的主要因素,但仍需进一步研究以明确探讨这种关系。应开展对现有数据(如登记数据)的回顾性研究,未来的研究应按性别报告结局(尤其是并发症)。

证据水平

III级,治疗性研究。

相似文献

1
Do Complication Rates Differ by Gender After Metal-on-metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Aug;473(8):2521-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4227-8.
3
What Are the Functional, Radiographic, and Survivorship Outcomes of a Modified Cup-cage Technique for Pelvic Discontinuity?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2149-2160. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003186. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
4
Is 18 F-fluoride PET/CT an Accurate Tool to Diagnose Loosening After Total Joint Arthroplasty?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 1;483(3):415-428. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003228. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
6
Outcomes of the Recalled Articular Surface Replacement Metal-on-Metal Hip Implant System: A Systematic Review.
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jan;32(1):341-346. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.060. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
7
What Are the Relative Associations of Surgeon Performance and Prosthesis Quality With THA Revision Rates?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 1;483(2):237-249. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003217. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
9
There Are No Differences in Short- to Mid-term Survivorship Among Total Hip-bearing Surface Options: A Network Meta-analysis.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):2031-41. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4065-0. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
10
Risk of revision and dislocation in single, dual mobility and large femoral head total hip arthroplasty: systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 Apr;28(3):445-455. doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-2073-y. Epub 2017 Nov 8.

引用本文的文献

2
What is the long-term survivorship, complication profile, and patient reported outcomes after Birmingham hip resurfacing?
J Orthop. 2024 Apr 16;55:134-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.04.016. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Towards the First Generation of Biomimetic Fixation for Resurfacing Arthroplasty Endoprostheses.
Biomimetics (Basel). 2024 Feb 8;9(2):99. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics9020099.
4
Same-gender differences in perioperative complications and transfusion management for lower limb arthroplasty.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Aug 16;24(1):653. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06788-x.
5
Comparisons of in-hospital complications between total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 May 11;24(1):375. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06487-7.
6
Challenges and solutions to advancing health equity with medical devices.
Nat Biotechnol. 2023 May;41(5):607-609. doi: 10.1038/s41587-023-01746-3.
8
Sex and Gender-Related Differences in the Outcome of Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Current Concepts Review.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Nov 22;58(12):1702. doi: 10.3390/medicina58121702.
9
Minimum 10-Year Results of Modular Metal-On-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty.
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 2;11(21):6505. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216505.

本文引用的文献

1
MRI findings following metal on metal hip arthroplasty and their relationship with metal ion levels and acetabular inclination angles.
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Aug;29(8):1647-52. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.03.030. Epub 2014 Mar 29.
2
Hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review comparing standardized outcomes.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jul;472(7):2217-30. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3556-3. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
4
Let's talk about sex, baby: gendered innovations in orthopaedic science.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Mar;472(3):793-5. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3456-y. Epub 2014 Jan 18.
5
Fairness to all: gender and sex in scientific reporting.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Feb;472(2):391-2. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3397-5. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
6
Ideal femoral head size in total hip arthroplasty balances stability and volumetric wear.
HSS J. 2012 Oct;8(3):270-4. doi: 10.1007/s11420-012-9287-7. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
7
The Canadian Arthroplasty Society's experience with hip resurfacing arthroplasty. An analysis of 2773 hips.
Bone Joint J. 2013 Aug;95-B(8):1045-51. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B8.31811.
8
Treatment of pseudotumors after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing based on magnetic resonance imaging, metal ion levels and symptoms.
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Feb;29(2):416-21. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.06.021. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
9
Incidence of adverse wear reactions in hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a single surgeon series of 2,600 cases.
Hip Int. 2013 May-Jun;23(3):250-8. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000030. Epub 2013 May 27.
10
High complication rate after revision of large-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Feb;472(2):523-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2979-6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验