Garcia-Valentin Antonio, Mestres Carlos A, Bernabeu Eduardo, Bahamonde José A, Martín Iván, Rueda Cristina, Domenech Alberto, Valencia Jamit, Fletcher Delfina, Machado Facundo, Amores José
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital Clinic, Valencia, Spain
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Feb;49(2):399-405. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv090. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
Since its development in the late 1990s, the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) has been the predictive model of choice for estimating mortality after cardiac surgery. As outcomes from cardiac surgery improved, the EuroSCORE showed a loss of calibration, and a revised version of the model was developed, EuroSCORE II. The objectives of this study were to examine the validity of both scores in the Spanish population, and to depict the performance of both models on a funnel plot.
A prospective multicentre study was performed, with requests to participate sent to all centres in Spain. Participating centres reported the EuroSCORE, EuroSCORE II and the actual mortality of each patient. Incomplete data were requested to get a zero incidence of lost data. Calibration of models was evaluated with the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, and discrimination with the areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. A funnel plot was constructed using mortality data from the 2010 European Registry, to represent risk-adjusted mortality.
Twenty Spanish centres participated in the study; 4034 patients undergoing cardiac surgery between 1 October 2012 and 31 March 2013 were collected. Prevalence of risk factors was analysed. The observed mortality rate was 6.5%. The mean additive EuroSCORE was 6.5. The mean expected mortality rate was 9.8% for the logistic EuroSCORE, and 5.7% for EuroSCORE II. Areas under the ROC curves were EuroSCORE: 0.77 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.75-0.80], EuroSCORE II: 0.79 (95% CI: 0.76-0.82). Results for the goodness-of-fit test were EuroSCORE: 33.02 (P < 0.001), EuroSCORE II: 38.98 (P < 0.001). Risk-adjusted mortality is far beyond the lower bound of the CI if EuroSCORE is used as the reference model, and is between the confidence limits, but near to the upper bound when EuroSCORE II is used.
Spanish cardiac surgical patients have a high-risk profile. Areas under the ROC curve show good discrimination for both models. Predicted mortality using EuroSCORE II more closely matches actual mortality than that predicted by the original EuroSCORE. Both models show statistically significant differences from the actual mortality rate, with EuroSCORE overpredicting and EuroSCORE II underpredicting mortality. The funnel plot illustrates risk-adjusted mortality clearly out of boundaries when EuroSCORE is used, and near underprediction when the reference is EuroSCORE II.
自20世纪90年代末问世以来,欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)一直是估计心脏手术后死亡率的首选预测模型。随着心脏手术结果的改善,EuroSCORE显示出校准度丧失的情况,因此开发了该模型的修订版EuroSCORE II。本研究的目的是检验这两种评分在西班牙人群中的有效性,并在漏斗图上描绘这两种模型的表现。
进行了一项前瞻性多中心研究,向西班牙所有中心发出参与邀请。参与中心报告了每位患者的EuroSCORE、EuroSCORE II和实际死亡率。要求提供不完整的数据以实现零数据丢失发生率。使用Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验评估模型的校准度,使用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积评估判别力。使用2010年欧洲注册中心的死亡率数据构建漏斗图,以表示风险调整后的死亡率。
20个西班牙中心参与了该研究;收集了2012年10月1日至2013年3月31日期间接受心脏手术的4034例患者。分析了危险因素的患病率。观察到的死亡率为6.5%。平均相加EuroSCORE为6.5。逻辑EuroSCORE的平均预期死亡率为9.8%,EuroSCORE II为5.7%。ROC曲线下面积分别为:EuroSCORE:0.77[95%置信区间(CI):0.75 - 0.80],EuroSCORE II:0.79(95%CI:0.76 - 0.82)。拟合优度检验结果为:EuroSCORE:33.02(P < 0.001),EuroSCORE II:38.98(P < 0.001)。如果将EuroSCORE用作参考模型,风险调整后的死亡率远远超出CI的下限;当使用EuroSCORE II时,风险调整后的死亡率在置信区间内,但接近上限。
西班牙心脏手术患者具有高风险特征。两种模型的ROC曲线下面积均显示出良好的判别力。使用EuroSCORE II预测的死亡率比原始EuroSCORE预测的死亡率更接近实际死亡率。两种模型与实际死亡率均存在统计学上的显著差异,EuroSCORE高估了死亡率,EuroSCORE II低估了死亡率。漏斗图表明,当使用EuroSCORE时,风险调整后的死亡率明显超出边界;当以EuroSCORE II为参考时,接近低估情况。