Akgun Ozlem Marti, Polat Gunseli Guven, Turan Illca Ahmet, Yildirim Ceren, Demir Pervin, Basak Feridun
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Gulhane Medical Academy, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Radiology, Izmir Mevki Military Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Iran J Radiol. 2014 Aug;11(3):e15565. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.15565. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
The effect of MRI on microleakage of amalgam restorations is an important health issue that should be considered. If MRI application causes increase of microleakage, amalgam fillings should be reassessed after MRI and replaced if necessary.
The aim of this study is to compare the effect of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on microleakage of class II bonded amalgam versus classical amalgam restorations.
Class II cavities (3 mm width × 1.5 mm depth) with gingival margins ending 1 mm below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) were prepared in 40 permanent molar teeth. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups. Cavities in the first and second groups were restored with dentin adhesive and amalgam (bonded amalgam), and those in the third and fourth groups with amalgam only. MRI was performed with the teeth specimens from the first and third groups. All specimens were then thermocycled at 5° to 55° C with a 30-second dwell time for 1000 cycles. The samples were then immersed in 0.5% methylene blue dye for 24 hours and sectioned longitudinally. Dye penetration at the occlusal and gingival margins was quantified by 15× stereomicroscopy. IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 21.0 (IBM Corp., Released 2012., IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.) and MS-Excel 2007 programs were used for statistical analyses and calculations. "nparLD" module was used for F2_LD_F1 design analysis at R program. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
In teeth with amalgam filling, there were no significant differences of occlusal and gingival surface microleakage after MRI exposure. Occlusal and gingival surface microleakages were also similar with and without MRI in teeth with bonded amalgam filling.
The results of this study suggest that MRI does not increase microleakage of amalgam restorations.
磁共振成像(MRI)对汞合金修复体微渗漏的影响是一个应予以考虑的重要健康问题。如果MRI检查导致微渗漏增加,那么在MRI检查后应重新评估汞合金填充物,必要时予以更换。
本研究旨在比较磁共振成像(MRI)对Ⅱ类粘结汞合金与传统汞合金修复体微渗漏的影响。
在40颗恒牙上制备Ⅱ类洞(宽3mm×深1.5mm),龈缘位于牙骨质釉质界(CEJ)下方1mm处。将牙齿随机分为四组。第一组和第二组的洞用牙本质粘结剂和汞合金修复(粘结汞合金),第三组和第四组的洞仅用汞合金修复。对第一组和第三组的牙齿标本进行MRI检查。然后将所有标本在5°至55°C下进行热循环,保持时间30秒,循环1000次。接着将样本浸入0.5%的亚甲蓝染料中24小时,然后纵向切片。通过15倍体视显微镜对咬合面和龈缘的染料渗透情况进行量化。使用IBM SPSS Statistics 21.0版软件(IBM公司,2012年发布,IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows,纽约州阿蒙克:IBM公司)和MS-Excel 2007程序进行统计分析和计算。在R程序中使用“nparLD”模块进行F2_LD_F1设计分析。P<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
对于汞合金充填的牙齿,MRI检查后咬合面和龈面的微渗漏无显著差异。对于粘结汞合金充填的牙齿,有无MRI检查时咬合面和龈面的微渗漏情况也相似。
本研究结果表明,MRI不会增加汞合金修复体的微渗漏。