Kanungo Suman, Desai Sachin N, Nandy Ranjan Kumar, Bhattacharya Mihir Kumar, Kim Deok Ryun, Sinha Anuradha, Mahapatra Tanmay, Yang Jae Seung, Lopez Anna Lena, Manna Byomkesh, Bannerjee Barnali, Ali Mohammad, Dhingra Mandeep Singh, Chandra Ananga Mohan, Clemens John D, Sur Dipika, Wierzba Thomas F
Division of Epidemiology, National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Kolkata, India.
Development and Delivery Unit, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Mar 12;9(3):e0003574. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003574. eCollection 2015 Mar.
A bivalent killed whole cell oral cholera vaccine has been found to be safe and efficacious for five years in the cholera endemic setting of Kolkata, India, when given in a two dose schedule, two weeks apart. A randomized controlled trial revealed that the immune response was not significantly increased following the second dose compared to that after the first dose. We aimed to evaluate the impact of an extended four week dosing schedule on vibriocidal response.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In this double blind randomized controlled non-inferiority trial, 356 Indian, non-pregnant residents aged 1 year or older were randomized to receive two doses of oral cholera vaccine at 14 and 28 day intervals. We compared vibriocidal immune responses between these schedules. Among adults, no significant differences were noted when comparing the rates of seroconversion for V. cholerae O1 Inaba following two dose regimens administered at a 14 day interval (55%) vs the 28 day interval (58%). Similarly, no differences in seroconversion were demonstrated in children comparing the 14 (80%) and 28 day intervals (77%). Following 14 and 28 day dosing intervals, vibriocidal response rates against V. cholerae O1 Ogawa were 45% and 49% in adults and 73% and 72% in children respectively. Responses were lower for V. cholerae O139, but similar between dosing schedules for adults (20%, 20%) and children (28%, 20%).
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Comparable immune responses and safety profiles between the two dosing schedules support the option for increased flexibility of current OCV dosing. Further operational research using a longer dosing regimen will provide answers to improve implementation and delivery of cholera vaccination in endemic and epidemic outbreak scenarios.
在印度加尔各答霍乱流行地区,一种二价灭活全细胞口服霍乱疫苗按两剂方案、间隔两周给药时,已被证明在五年内安全有效。一项随机对照试验显示,与第一剂后相比,第二剂后的免疫反应没有显著增加。我们旨在评估延长至四周的给药方案对杀弧菌反应的影响。
方法/主要发现:在这项双盲随机对照非劣效性试验中,356名年龄在1岁及以上的印度非孕妇居民被随机分配,分别在间隔14天和28天接受两剂口服霍乱疫苗。我们比较了这些给药方案之间的杀弧菌免疫反应。在成年人中,比较间隔14天(55%)与间隔28天(58%)接种两剂方案后霍乱弧菌O1稻叶型的血清转化率时,未发现显著差异。同样,在儿童中,比较间隔14天(80%)和28天(77%)的血清转化率时,也未发现差异。在间隔14天和28天给药后,成年人针对霍乱弧菌O1小川型的杀弧菌反应率分别为45%和49%,儿童分别为73%和72%。针对霍乱弧菌O139的反应较低,但成年人(20%,20%)和儿童(28%,20%)的给药方案之间相似。
结论/意义:两种给药方案之间可比的免疫反应和安全性概况支持增加当前口服霍乱疫苗给药灵活性的选择。使用更长给药方案的进一步操作性研究将为改善霍乱疫苗在流行和疫情爆发情况下的实施和接种提供答案。