• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

股总动脉及其分叉处的血管成形术。

Angioplasty of the common femoral artery and its bifurcation.

作者信息

Thiney Pierre-Olivier, Millon Antoine, Boudjelit Tarek, Della Schiava Nellie, Feugier Patrick, Lermusiaux Patrick

机构信息

Service de Chirurgie Vasculaire, Groupement Hospitalier Edouard Herriot, CHU, Lyon, France.

Service de Chirurgie Vasculaire, Groupement Hospitalier Edouard Herriot, CHU, Lyon, France; Faculté de Médecine Lyon 1, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2015 Jul;29(5):960-7. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2015.02.001
PMID:25765633
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of atherosclerotic lesions of the common femoral artery (CFA) and its bifurcation.

METHODS

From 2009 to 2013, 53 patients (43 men, average age, 68 years) were included in a single-center, nonrandomized, prospective study. Indication was disabling intermittent claudication (n = 36) or chronic critical limb ischemia (n = 17). Thirty-four procedures (64%) were isolated CFA PTA, whereas 7 of 53 (13%) involved inflow (including 4 iliac occlusions) and 12 of 53 (23%) involved outflow vessels. Primary stenting was performed in 50 cases (95%). CFA occlusions were recanalized in 4 of 53. Lesions involved the bifurcation in 22 cases (40%). Follow-up consisted of clinical examination and duplex scanning with ankle-brachial index measurement at 1, 6, and 12 months. A biplane X-ray was performed at 1 year. The primary end point was the absence of binary restenosis (>50% reobstruction of the CFA). Secondary end points were freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) and stent fracture rate.

RESULTS

Procedural success was achieved in 96% of cases. At a mean follow-up of 24 months (with 1 patient lost of follow-up), the absence of binary restenosis was 92.5%. At the end of follow-up, 82% of patients continued to show clinical improvement. Freedom from TLR was 97%. Stent fracture rate at 1 year was 9%.

CONCLUSIONS

PTA of the CFA and its bifurcation is a reliable technique with good midterm functional results. These results justify performing a randomized study comparing surgery and endovascular treatment.

摘要

背景

评估经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)治疗股总动脉(CFA)及其分叉处动脉粥样硬化病变的疗效。

方法

2009年至2013年,53例患者(43例男性,平均年龄68岁)纳入一项单中心、非随机、前瞻性研究。入选标准为致残性间歇性跛行(n = 36)或慢性严重肢体缺血(n = 17)。53例中有34例(64%)为单纯CFA PTA,53例中有7例(13%)涉及流入道(包括4例髂动脉闭塞),53例中有12例(23%)涉及流出道血管。50例(95%)患者进行了初次支架置入。53例中有4例CFA闭塞病变成功再通。22例(40%)病变累及分叉处。随访包括临床检查以及在1、6和12个月时进行双功超声扫描并测量踝肱指数。1年时进行双平面X线检查。主要终点为无二元再狭窄(CFA再阻塞>50%)。次要终点为免于靶病变血管重建(TLR)和支架骨折率。

结果

96%的病例手术成功。平均随访24个月(1例失访)时,无二元再狭窄率为92.5%。随访结束时,82%的患者临床症状持续改善。免于TLR率为97%。1年时支架骨折率为9%。

结论

CFA及其分叉处的PTA是一种可靠的技术,中期功能结果良好。这些结果证明有必要开展一项比较手术治疗和血管内治疗的随机研究。

相似文献

1
Angioplasty of the common femoral artery and its bifurcation.股总动脉及其分叉处的血管成形术。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2015 Jul;29(5):960-7. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
2
Efficacy and safety of adjunctive drug-coated balloon therapy in endovascular treatment of common femoral artery disease.药物涂层球囊辅助治疗股总动脉疾病的血管内治疗的疗效和安全性。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Mar;20(3):210-214. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.06.018. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
3
High dose-rate brachytherapy for the treatment of lower extremity in-stent restenosis.高剂量率近距离放射疗法治疗下肢支架内再狭窄
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Mar;65(3):734-743. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
4
Nitinol stent implantation in the superficial femoral artery and proximal popliteal artery: twelve-month results from the complete SE multicenter trial.镍钛诺支架植入治疗股浅动脉和腘动脉近端病变:完全 SE 多中心试验 12 个月结果。
J Endovasc Ther. 2014 Apr;21(2):202-12. doi: 10.1583/13-4548R.1.
5
Endovascular treatment for symptomatic stent failures in long-segment chronic total occlusion of femoropopliteal arteries.症状性支架内再狭窄的血管内治疗:长段股腘动脉慢性完全闭塞病变
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Aug;60(2):362-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.02.051. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
6
Retrograde Popliteal Access to Percutaneous Peripheral Intervention for Chronic Total Occlusion of Superficial Femoral Arteries.经腘动脉逆行入路用于经皮外周介入治疗股浅动脉慢性完全闭塞病变
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2017 Jul;51(5):240-246. doi: 10.1177/1538574417698902. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
7
The United States StuDy for EvalUating EndovasculaR TreAtments of Lesions in the Superficial Femoral Artery and Proximal Popliteal By usIng the Protégé EverfLex NitInol STent SYstem II (DURABILITY II).美国评估使用 Protégé Everflex Nitinol STent System II(耐久性 II)治疗股浅动脉和腘动脉近端病变的研究。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Jul;58(1):73-83.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.12.066. Epub 2013 May 2.
8
Primary Self-EXPANDing Nitinol Stenting vs Balloon Angioplasty With Optional Bailout Stenting for the Treatment of Infrapopliteal Artery Disease in Patients With Severe Intermittent Claudication or Critical Limb Ischemia (EXPAND Study).原发性自膨式镍钛合金支架置入术与球囊血管成形术联合选择性补救性支架置入术治疗重度间歇性跛行或严重肢体缺血患者的腘下动脉疾病(EXPAND研究)
J Endovasc Ther. 2015 Oct;22(5):690-7. doi: 10.1177/1526602815598955. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
9
Percutaneous radial access for peripheral transluminal angioplasty.经皮桡动脉途径用于外周血管腔内血管成形术。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Feb;61(2):463-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.07.009. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
10
Endovascular treatment of popliteal artery segments P1 and P2 in patients with critical limb ischemia: initial experience using a helical nitinol stent with increased radial force.使用具有增加径向力的螺旋镍钛诺支架治疗伴有严重肢体缺血的患者的 P1 和 P2 段腘动脉:初步经验
J Endovasc Ther. 2012 Jun;19(3):450-6. doi: 10.1583/11-3591MR.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Open and endovascular treatment of the common femoral artery in a tertiary care center.三级医疗中心对股总动脉的开放及血管腔内治疗
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Feb;81(2):386-396.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.10.027. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
2
Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy in the Treatment of Calcified Common Femoral Artery Disease.血管内碎石术与斑块旋切术治疗股总动脉钙化性疾病的对比
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 May 20;1(4):100374. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100374. eCollection 2022 Jul-Aug.
3
Up and over staged endoconduit technique for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.
用于血管腔内主动脉瘤修复的上翻式分期内导管技术
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2024 Feb 13;10(3):101449. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2024.101449. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Surgical, Endovascular, and Multimodal Approaches to the Management of Atherosclerotic Common Femoral Artery Disease.手术、血管内及多模式治疗方法用于管理动脉粥样硬化性股总动脉疾病
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2023 Jun 16;40(2):156-160. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-57262. eCollection 2023 Apr.
5
Common Femoral Artery Curvature During Hip Flexion.髋关节屈曲时股总动脉的弯曲程度。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023 Jul;46(7):844-851. doi: 10.1007/s00270-023-03479-x. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
6
Fracking compared to conventional balloon angioplasty alone for calcified common femoral artery lesions using intravascular ultrasound analysis: 12-month results.使用血管内超声分析比较水力压裂与单纯传统球囊血管成形术治疗钙化股总动脉病变的12个月结果。
CVIR Endovasc. 2023 Apr 20;6(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s42155-023-00373-y.
7
SUPERA Stenting in the Common Femoral Artery: Early Experience and Practical Considerations.Supera 支架在股总动脉中的应用:早期经验与实际考虑。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2022 May;56(4):357-368. doi: 10.1177/15385744211068648. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
8
Vascular complications with a plug-based vascular closure device after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Predictors and bail-outs.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后采用封堵器所致血管并发症:预测因素和挽救措施。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Nov 1;98(5):E737-E745. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29506. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
9
Lower extremity revascularization via endovascular and surgical approaches: A systematic review with emphasis on combined inflow and outflow revascularization.通过血管内和外科手术方法进行下肢血运重建:一项侧重于联合流入道和流出道血运重建的系统评价
SAGE Open Med. 2020 Jun 4;8:2050312120929239. doi: 10.1177/2050312120929239. eCollection 2020.
10
An Overview of the Treatment of Symptomatic Common Femoral Artery Lesions with a Focus on Endovascular Therapy.有症状的股总动脉病变的治疗概述:重点关注血管内治疗
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2020 Feb 20;16:67-73. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S242291. eCollection 2020.