Doré Bruce, Ort Leonard, Braverman Ofir, Ochsner Kevin N
Columbia University
Columbia University.
Psychol Sci. 2015 Apr;26(4):363-73. doi: 10.1177/0956797614562218. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
How do increasing temporal and spatial distance affect the emotions people feel and express in response to tragic events? Standard views suggest that emotional intensity should decrease but are silent on changes in emotional quality. Using a large Twitter data set, we identified temporal and spatial patterns in use of emotional and cognitive words in tweets about the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. Although use of sadness words decreased with time and spatial distance, use of anxiety words showed the opposite pattern and was associated with concurrent increases in language reflecting causal thinking. In a follow-up experiment, we found that thinking about abstract causes (as opposed to concrete details) of this event similarly evoked decreased sadness but increased anxiety, which was associated with perceptions that a similar event might occur in the future. These data challenge current theories of emotional reactivity and identify time, space, and abstract causal thinking as factors that elicit categorical shifts in emotional responses to tragedy.
时间和空间距离的增加如何影响人们在面对悲剧事件时所感受到并表达出的情绪?标准观点认为情绪强度应该会降低,但对于情绪质量的变化却未作说明。通过一个庞大的推特数据集,我们确定了关于桑迪胡克小学枪击案的推文在使用情感和认知词汇方面的时间和空间模式。尽管悲伤词汇的使用随着时间和空间距离的增加而减少,但焦虑词汇的使用却呈现出相反的模式,并且与反映因果思维的语言同时增加有关。在一项后续实验中,我们发现思考该事件的抽象原因(而非具体细节)同样会引发悲伤情绪的减少,但焦虑情绪的增加,这与认为类似事件可能在未来发生的认知有关。这些数据挑战了当前的情绪反应理论,并确定时间、空间和抽象因果思维是引发对悲剧情绪反应发生类别转变的因素。