Malgo Frank, Hamdy Neveen A T, Papapoulos Socrates E, Appelman-Dijkstra Natasha M
Center for Bone Quality, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015 May;100(5):2039-45. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-4346. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
Bone mineral density (BMD) does not fully capture fracture risk as the majority of fractures occur in patients with osteopenia, suggesting that altered bone material properties and changes in microarchitecture may contribute to fracture risk.
This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between bone material strength (BMS), measured by microindentation in vivo, and fracture in patients with low bone mass.
BMS was measured in 90 patients (mean age, 61.0 y; range, 40.4-85.5 y) with low bone mass with or without a fragility fracture. Sixty-three patients had sustained one or more fragility fractures.
There was a significant negative correlation between age and BMS (r = -0.539; P < .001) and with the 10-year fracture probability with and without inclusion of femoral neck BMD as calculated by FRAX (r = -0.383; P < .001 and r = -0.426; P < .001, respectively). BMS values were lower in patients with a fragility fracture compared with nonfracture patients (79.9 ± 0.6 vs 82.4 ± 1.0; P = .032) despite similar BMD. BMS was comparable in patients with a fragility fracture whether they had osteopenia or osteoporosis (79.8 ± 0.8 vs 78.7 ± 1.1; P = .456). In patients with osteopenia, BMS was significantly lower in fracture patients than in nonfracture patients (80.3 ± 0.7 vs 83.9 ± 1.2; P = .015).
These data suggest that patients with fractures have altered material properties of bone that are not captured by BMD. Additional studies are required to establish the value of BMS in the prediction of fracture risk, especially in patients with osteopenia.
骨矿物质密度(BMD)并不能完全反映骨折风险,因为大多数骨折发生在骨量减少的患者中,这表明骨材料特性的改变和微结构的变化可能导致骨折风险。
本研究旨在评估通过体内微压痕测量的骨材料强度(BMS)与低骨量患者骨折之间的关系。
对90例低骨量患者(平均年龄61.0岁;范围40.4 - 85.5岁)进行BMS测量,这些患者有或没有脆性骨折。63例患者发生过一次或多次脆性骨折。
年龄与BMS之间存在显著负相关(r = -0.539;P < 0.001),并且与FRAX计算的包含或不包含股骨颈BMD的10年骨折概率也存在负相关(分别为r = -0.383;P < 0.001和r = -0.426;P < 0.001)。尽管BMD相似,但脆性骨折患者的BMS值低于未骨折患者(79.9 ± 0.6对82.4 ± 1.0;P = 0.032)。无论骨量减少还是骨质疏松,脆性骨折患者的BMS相当(79.8 ± 0.8对78.7 ± 1.1;P = 0.456)。在骨量减少的患者中,骨折患者的BMS显著低于未骨折患者(80.3 ± 0.7对83.9 ± 1.2;P = 0.015)。
这些数据表明,骨折患者的骨材料特性发生了改变,而BMD无法反映这些改变。需要进一步研究以确定BMS在预测骨折风险中的价值,尤其是在骨量减少的患者中。