Harvey Allison G, Gumport Nicole B
Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, United States.
Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, United States.
Behav Res Ther. 2015 May;68:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.02.004. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
The prevalence of mental disorders is high and appears to be growing, yet the majority of individuals who meet diagnostic criteria for a mental disorder are not able to access an adequate treatment. While evidence-based psychological treatments (EBPTs) are effective single or adjunctive treatments for mental disorders, there is also evidence that access to these treatments is diminishing. We seek to highlight modifiable barriers to these problems at the patient, therapist, treatment, organization and government-levels of analysis. A range of solutions to each set of contributors is offered and domains for future research are highlighted. In particular, we focus on the need to continue to work toward innovation in treatment development while also solving the difficulties relating to the dissemination of EBPTs. Several relatively new concepts in the field will be discussed (implementation cliff, program drift, voltage drop and deployment treatment development) and we contrast America and England as examples of government-level processes that are in the process of major change with respect to EBPTs. We conclude that there is a need for people in our field to become more knowledgeable about, and get involved in, shaping public policy.
精神障碍的患病率很高且似乎在不断上升,然而,大多数符合精神障碍诊断标准的人无法获得充分的治疗。虽然循证心理治疗(EBPTs)是治疗精神障碍有效的单一或辅助治疗方法,但也有证据表明获得这些治疗的机会正在减少。我们试图在患者、治疗师、治疗、组织和政府层面的分析中突出这些问题的可改变障碍。针对每组促成因素提供了一系列解决方案,并突出了未来研究的领域。特别是,我们强调需要继续致力于治疗开发的创新,同时解决与循证心理治疗传播相关的困难。将讨论该领域的几个相对较新的概念(实施悬崖、项目漂移、电压降和部署治疗开发),我们将美国和英国作为政府层面过程的例子进行对比,这些过程在循证心理治疗方面正处于重大变革之中。我们得出结论,我们这个领域的人需要更多地了解并参与塑造公共政策。