Armitage Derek, de Loë Rob C, Morris Michelle, Edwards Tom W D, Gerlak Andrea K, Hall Roland I, Huitema Dave, Ison Ray, Livingstone David, MacDonald Glen, Mirumachi Naho, Plummer Ryan, Wolfe Brent B
Environmental Change & Governance Group, Department of Environment and Resource Studies, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada,
Ambio. 2015 Sep;44(5):353-66. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0644-x. Epub 2015 Mar 14.
In this policy perspective, we outline several conditions to support effective science-policy interaction, with a particular emphasis on improving water governance in transboundary basins. Key conditions include (1) recognizing that science is a crucial but bounded input into water resource decision-making processes; (2) establishing conditions for collaboration and shared commitment among actors; (3) understanding that social or group-learning processes linked to science-policy interaction are enhanced through greater collaboration; (4) accepting that the collaborative production of knowledge about hydrological issues and associated socioeconomic change and institutional responses is essential to build legitimate decision-making processes; and (5) engaging boundary organizations and informal networks of scientists, policy makers, and civil society. We elaborate on these conditions with a diverse set of international examples drawn from a synthesis of our collective experiences in assessing the opportunities and constraints (including the role of power relations) related to governance for water in transboundary settings.
在本政策视角中,我们概述了若干支持有效科学-政策互动的条件,特别强调改善跨界流域的水治理。关键条件包括:(1)认识到科学是水资源决策过程中的关键但有限的投入;(2)为行为体之间的合作与共同承诺创造条件;(3)理解通过加强合作可增强与科学-政策互动相关的社会或群体学习过程;(4)承认关于水文问题及相关社会经济变化和体制应对措施的知识的合作生产对于建立合法决策过程至关重要;(5)让边界组织以及科学家、政策制定者和民间社会的非正式网络参与进来。我们借助一系列多样的国际实例详细阐述这些条件,这些实例源自我们在评估跨界环境中与水治理相关的机遇和制约因素(包括权力关系的作用)的集体经验总结。