• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

海洋研究重点:美国科学家、政策制定者和渔民之间的异同

Ocean Research Priorities: Similarities and Differences among Scientists, Policymakers, and Fishermen in the United States.

作者信息

Mason Julia G, Rudd Murray A, Crowder Larry B

机构信息

Julia G. Mason (

出版信息

Bioscience. 2017 May 1;67(5):418-428. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biw172. Epub 2017 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1093/biosci/biw172
PMID:28533565
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5421313/
Abstract

Understanding and solving complex ocean conservation problems requires cooperation not just among scientific disciplines but also across sectors. A recently published survey that probed research priorities of marine scientists, when provided to ocean stakeholders, revealed some agreement on priorities but also illuminated key differences. Ocean acidification, cumulative impacts, bycatch effects, and restoration effectiveness were in the top 10 priorities for scientists and stakeholder groups. Significant priority differences were that scientists favored research questions about ocean acidification and marine protected areas; policymakers prioritized questions about habitat restoration, bycatch, and precaution; and fisheries sector resource users called for the inclusion of local ecological knowledge in policymaking. These results quantitatively demonstrate how different stakeholder groups approach ocean issues and highlight the need to incorporate other types of knowledge in the codesign of solutions-oriented research, which may facilitate cross-sectoral collaboration.

摘要

理解和解决复杂的海洋保护问题不仅需要跨科学学科的合作,还需要跨部门的合作。最近发表的一项对海洋科学家研究重点进行调查的研究,在提供给海洋利益相关者时,揭示了在优先事项上的一些共识,但也凸显了关键差异。海洋酸化、累积影响、副渔获物影响和恢复效果在科学家和利益相关者群体的前10大优先事项中。显著的优先事项差异在于,科学家们倾向于关于海洋酸化和海洋保护区的研究问题;政策制定者将栖息地恢复、副渔获物和预防问题列为优先事项;渔业部门的资源使用者呼吁在政策制定中纳入当地生态知识。这些结果定量地展示了不同利益相关者群体处理海洋问题的方式,并强调了在以解决方案为导向的研究的共同设计中纳入其他类型知识的必要性,这可能有助于跨部门合作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39a0/5421313/24392de04468/biw172fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39a0/5421313/348b3337d2bb/biw172fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39a0/5421313/24392de04468/biw172fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39a0/5421313/348b3337d2bb/biw172fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39a0/5421313/24392de04468/biw172fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Ocean Research Priorities: Similarities and Differences among Scientists, Policymakers, and Fishermen in the United States.海洋研究重点:美国科学家、政策制定者和渔民之间的异同
Bioscience. 2017 May 1;67(5):418-428. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biw172. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
2
Research priorities for conservation and natural resource management in Oceania's small-island developing states.大洋洲小岛屿发展中国家保护和自然资源管理的研究重点。
Conserv Biol. 2018 Feb;32(1):72-83. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12964. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
3
New perspectives in ocean acidification research: editor's introduction to the special feature on ocean acidification.海洋酸化研究的新视角:编辑对海洋酸化专题的介绍
Biol Lett. 2017 Sep;13(9). doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2017.0438.
4
Ocean acidification: Linking science to management solutions using the Great Barrier Reef as a case study.海洋酸化:以大堡礁为案例研究,将科学与管理解决方案相联系
J Environ Manage. 2016 Nov 1;182:641-650. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.038. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
5
Ocean zoning for conservation, fisheries and marine renewable energy: assessing trade-offs and co-location opportunities.海洋区域划分为保护、渔业和海洋可再生能源:评估权衡和共同选址机会。
J Environ Manage. 2015 Apr 1;152:201-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.045. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
6
Striking a balance between biodiversity conservation and socioeconomic viability in the design of marine protected areas.在海洋保护区的设计中,平衡生物多样性保护与社会经济可行性。
Conserv Biol. 2008 Jun;22(3):691-700. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00896.x. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
7
Solutions for ecosystem-level protection of ocean systems under climate change.应对气候变化影响下海洋系统的生态系统层面保护的解决方案。
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Dec;22(12):3927-3936. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13423. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
8
Effects of near-future ocean acidification, fishing, and marine protection on a temperate coastal ecosystem.未来近海酸化、捕捞和海洋保护对温带沿海生态系统的影响。
Conserv Biol. 2015 Feb;29(1):207-15. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12394. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
9
Public awareness, concerns, and priorities about anthropogenic impacts on marine environments.公众对人为活动对海洋环境影响的认识、关注及优先事项。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Oct 21;111(42):15042-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1417344111. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
10
Fisheries bycatch risk to marine megafauna is intensified in Lagrangian coherent structures.拉格朗日相干结构会加剧海洋大型动物的渔业副渔获物风险。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jul 10;115(28):7362-7367. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1801270115. Epub 2018 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving the Integration of Restoration and Conservation in Marine and Coastal Ecosystems: Lessons from the Disaster.加强海洋和沿海生态系统恢复与保护的整合:从灾难中吸取的教训
Bioscience. 2019 Nov 1;69(11):920-927. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biz103. Epub 2019 Sep 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Science-policy processes for transboundary water governance.跨界水资源治理的科学政策进程。
Ambio. 2015 Sep;44(5):353-66. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0644-x. Epub 2015 Mar 14.
2
International scientists' priorities for research on pharmaceutical and personal care products in the environment.国际科学家对环境中药品和个人护理产品研究的优先事项。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2014 Oct;10(4):576-87. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1551.
3
Identifying the science and technology dimensions of emerging public policy issues through horizon scanning.
通过前沿扫描确定新出现的公共政策问题的科学技术维度。
PLoS One. 2014 May 30;9(5):e96480. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096480. eCollection 2014.
4
Advancing the use of local ecological knowledge for assessing data-poor species in coastal ecosystems.推进利用本土生态知识评估沿海生态系统中数据匮乏物种的应用。
Ecol Appl. 2014 Mar;24(2):244-56. doi: 10.1890/13-0817.1.
5
Evolution of natural and social science interactions in global change research programs.全球变化研究计划中自然科学和社会科学相互作用的演变。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Feb 26;110 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):3665-72. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1107484110. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
6
A collaboratively-derived science-policy research agenda.协作产生的科学政策研究议程。
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e31824. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031824. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
7
How research-prioritization exercises affect conservation policy.研究优先级制定工作如何影响保护政策。
Conserv Biol. 2011 Oct;25(5):860-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01712.x. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
8
One hundred questions of importance to the conservation of global biological diversity.全球生物多样性保护的 100 个重要问题。
Conserv Biol. 2009 Jun;23(3):557-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01212.x. Epub 2009 Apr 22.
9
A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems.一张人类对海洋生态系统影响的全球地图。
Science. 2008 Feb 15;319(5865):948-52. doi: 10.1126/science.1149345.
10
Fusion or failure? The future of conservation biology.融合还是失败?保护生物学的未来。
Conserv Biol. 2006 Jun;20(3):692-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00434.x.