Jones Charlotte A, Ross Leanne, Surani Nadia, Dharamshi Narissa, Karmali Karima
Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, Southern Medical Program, University of British Columbia-Okanagan, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
Independent Researcher, Toronto, ON, Canada.
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 17;10(3):e0119183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119183. eCollection 2015.
The goal of this analysis was to determine the agreement between body mass index-based and cholesterol-based ten-year Framingham general cardiovascular disease risk scores among a convenience sample of 773 South Asian Canadian adults attending community-based screening clinics. Scores were calculated using age, systolic blood pressure, antihypertensive use, current smoking, diabetes, and total cholesterol and high density lipoprotein (for cholesterol-based risk) or height and weight (for body mass index-based risk). Mean risk score differences (body mass index-based risk minus cholesterol-based risk) were estimated using paired t-tests. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess agreement between scores. Finally, agreement across risk categories (low [<10%], moderate [10% to <20%], high [> = 20%]) was examined using the kappa statistic. Average agreement between the two risk scores was quite good overall (mean differences of 0.6% for men and 0.5% for women), but increased to about 3% among participants 60-74 years of age. However, Bland-Altman plots revealed that the differences between the two scores and the variability of the differences increased with increasing average 10-year risk. In terms of clinical importance, the limits of agreement were reasonable for women < 60 years (95% confidence interval: -3.2% to 3.1%), but of concern for women 60-74 years (95% confidence interval: -6.0% to 12.3%), men < 60 years (95% confidence interval: -7.1% to 7.3%) and men 6-074 years (95% confidence interval: -13.8% to 18.8%). Agreement across categories was moderate for most sex and age groups examined (kappa values: 0.51 for women < 60 years, 0.50 for women 60-74 years, 0.65 for men < 60 years), except for men 60-74 years, where agreement was only fair (kappa = 0.26). In light of these disagreements, evaluation of a participant's change in cardiovascular disease risk over time will necessitate use of the same risk score (i.e., either body mass index-based or cholesterol-based) at all screening sessions.
本分析的目的是在一个便利样本中,确定基于体重指数(BMI)和基于胆固醇的十年弗雷明汉一般心血管疾病风险评分之间的一致性。该样本包括773名参加社区筛查诊所的南亚裔加拿大成年人。使用年龄、收缩压、是否使用抗高血压药物、当前吸烟状况、糖尿病以及总胆固醇和高密度脂蛋白(用于基于胆固醇的风险评估)或身高和体重(用于基于BMI的风险评估)来计算得分。使用配对t检验估计平均风险评分差异(基于BMI的风险减去基于胆固醇的风险)。采用布兰德-奥特曼图来评估评分之间的一致性。最后,使用kappa统计量检验不同风险类别(低风险[<10%]、中度风险[10%至<20%]、高风险[>=20%])之间的一致性。总体而言,两种风险评分之间的平均一致性相当好(男性平均差异为0.6%,女性为0.5%),但在60 - 74岁的参与者中,差异增加到约3%。然而,布兰德-奥特曼图显示,随着平均十年风险的增加,两种评分之间的差异以及差异的变异性也随之增加。就临床重要性而言,60岁以下女性的一致性界限是合理的(95%置信区间:-3.2%至3.1%),但60 - 74岁女性(95%置信区间:-6.0%至12.3%)、60岁以下男性(95%置信区间:-7.1%至7.3%)和60 - 74岁男性(95%置信区间:-13.8%至18.8%)的情况令人担忧。在所检查的大多数性别和年龄组中,不同类别之间的一致性为中等(kappa值:60岁以下女性为0.51,60 - 74岁女性为0.50,60岁以下男性为0.65),但60 - 74岁男性的一致性仅为一般(kappa = 0.26)。鉴于这些差异,在评估参与者心血管疾病风险随时间的变化时,在所有筛查环节都必须使用相同的风险评分(即要么基于BMI,要么基于胆固醇)。