Sato Hirotaka, Vo Doan Tat Thang, Kolev Svetoslav, Huynh Ngoc Anh, Zhang Chao, Massey Travis L, van Kleef Joshua, Ikeda Kazuo, Abbeel Pieter, Maharbiz Michel M
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 65 Nanyang Drive, Singapore 637460, Singapore.
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 65 Nanyang Drive, Singapore 637460, Singapore.
Curr Biol. 2015 Mar 16;25(6):798-803. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.051.
Testing hypotheses of neuromuscular function during locomotion ideally requires the ability to record cellular responses and to stimulate the cells being investigated to observe downstream behaviors [1]. The inability to stimulate in free flight has been a long-standing hurdle for insect flight studies. The miniaturization of computation and communication technologies has delivered ultra-small, radio-enabled neuromuscular recorders and stimulators for untethered insects [2-8]. Published stimulation targets include the areas in brain potentially responsible for pattern generation in locomotion [5], the nerve chord for abdominal flexion [9], antennal muscles [2, 10], and the flight muscles (or their excitatory junctions) [7, 11-13]. However, neither fine nor graded control of turning has been demonstrated in free flight, and responses to the stimulation vary widely [2, 5, 7, 9]. Technological limitations have precluded hypotheses of function validation requiring exogenous stimulation during flight. We investigated the role of a muscle involved in wing articulation during flight in a coleopteran. We set out to identify muscles whose stimulation produced a graded turning in free flight, a feat that would enable fine steering control not previously demonstrated. We anticipated that gradation might arise either as a function of the phase of muscle firing relative to the wing stroke (as in the classic fly b1 muscle [14, 15] or the dorsal longitudinal and ventral muscles of moth [16]), or due to regulated tonic control, in which phase-independent summation of twitch responses produces varying amounts of force delivered to the wing linkages [15, 17, 18].
在运动过程中测试神经肌肉功能的假设,理想情况下需要具备记录细胞反应以及刺激被研究细胞以观察下游行为的能力[1]。无法在自由飞行状态下进行刺激一直是昆虫飞行研究的一个长期障碍。计算和通信技术的小型化已为无束缚昆虫提供了超小型、具备无线电功能的神经肌肉记录器和刺激器[2 - 8]。已公布的刺激目标包括大脑中可能负责运动模式生成的区域[5]、负责腹部弯曲的神经索[9]、触角肌肉[2, 10]以及飞行肌肉(或其兴奋性连接点)[7, 11 - 13]。然而,在自由飞行中尚未证明对转向有精细或分级控制,并且对刺激的反应差异很大[2, 5, 7, 9]。技术限制排除了在飞行过程中需要外源刺激来验证功能假设的可能性。我们研究了一种鞘翅目昆虫飞行过程中参与翅关节运动的一块肌肉的作用。我们着手识别那些在自由飞行中刺激能产生分级转向的肌肉,这一成果将实现此前未被证明的精细转向控制。我们预计分级可能源于相对于翅振的肌肉放电相位(如经典果蝇的b1肌肉[14, 15]或蛾类的背纵肌和腹侧肌肉[16]),或者是由于调节性强直控制,即抽搐反应的相位无关总和产生传递到翅连接的不同大小的力[15, 17, 18]。