• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于腹腔镜检查的患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)

PROMIS for Laparoscopy.

作者信息

Bingener Juliane, Sloan Jeff A, Seisler Drew K, McConico Andrea L, Skaran Pamela E, Farley David R, Truty Mark J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA,

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 May;19(5):917-26. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2789-0. Epub 2015 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1007/s11605-015-2789-0
PMID:25784369
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4405496/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We tested the responsiveness of the National Institutes of Health-sponsored Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures Information System (PROMIS) global health short form and a linear analog self-assessment for laparoscopy.

METHODS

From May 2011 through December 2013, patients undergoing laparoscopy responded to patient reported outcome questionnaires perioperatively. Composite and single item scores were compared.

RESULTS

One hundred fifteen patients, mean age 55 years, 58 % female, were enrolled. Visual analog pain scores differed significantly from baseline (mean 1.7 ± 2.3) to postoperative day 1 (mean 4.8 ± 2.6) and 7 (mean 2.5 ± 2.1) (p<0.0001). PROMIS physical subscale and total physical component subscore differed significantly from baseline (14.4 ± 3.0/47.4 ± 8.3) to postoperative day 1 (12.7 ± 3.2/42.1 ± 8.8) (p=0.0007/0.0003), due to everyday physical activities (p=0.0001). Linear analog self-assessment scores differed from baseline for pain frequency (p<0.0001), pain severity (p<0.0001), and social activity (p=0.0052); 40 % of subjects reported worsening in PROMIS physical T-score to postoperative day 1 and 25 % to postoperative day 7. Linear analog self-assessment mental well-being scores were worse in 32 % of patients at postoperative day 7, emotional well-being in 28 %, social activity in 24 %, and fatigue in 20 % of patients.

CONCLUSION

Single items and change from baseline are responsive perioperative quality of life assessments for laparoscopy.

摘要

引言

我们测试了美国国立卫生研究院资助的患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)全球健康简表以及腹腔镜检查的线性模拟自评法的反应性。

方法

2011年5月至2013年12月,接受腹腔镜检查的患者在围手术期对患者报告结局问卷作出回应。比较了综合得分和单项得分。

结果

共纳入115例患者,平均年龄55岁,58%为女性。视觉模拟疼痛评分从基线(平均1.7±2.3)到术后第1天(平均4.8±2.6)和第7天(平均2.5±2.1)有显著差异(p<0.0001)。PROMIS身体亚量表和总身体成分子得分从基线(14.4±3.0/47.4±8.3)到术后第1天(12.7±3.2/42.1±8.8)有显著差异(p=0.0007/0.0003),这是由于日常身体活动所致(p=0.0001)。线性模拟自评法在疼痛频率(p<0.0001)、疼痛严重程度(p<0.0001)和社交活动(p=0.0052)方面与基线存在差异;40%的受试者报告术后第1天PROMIS身体T得分恶化,25%的受试者报告术后第7天恶化。32%的患者在术后第7天线性模拟自评法心理健康得分较差,28%的患者情绪健康得分较差,24%的患者社交活动得分较差,20%的患者疲劳得分较差。

结论

单项指标及与基线的变化对腹腔镜检查围手术期生活质量评估具有反应性。

相似文献

1
PROMIS for Laparoscopy.用于腹腔镜检查的患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)
J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 May;19(5):917-26. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2789-0. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
2
How Does the Level of Sacral Resection for Primary Malignant Bone Tumors Affect Physical and Mental Health, Pain, Mobility, Incontinence, and Sexual Function?原发性恶性骨肿瘤的骶骨切除水平如何影响身心健康、疼痛、活动能力、大小便失禁及性功能?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Mar;474(3):687-96. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4361-3.
3
Validation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computerized adaptive tests in cervical spine surgery.患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)计算机自适应测试在颈椎手术中的验证
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):268-279. doi: 10.3171/2017.7.SPINE17661. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
4
Moderate Weightbearing Restrictions Are Associated with Worse Depressive Symptoms and Anxiety in Children Aged 5 to 7 Years with Perthes Disease.中重度负重限制与 5 至 7 岁儿童佩特氏病的抑郁症状和焦虑有关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Mar 1;480(3):587-599. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002010.
5
The Influence of Preoperative Mental Health on PROMIS Physical Function Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.术前心理健康对微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后 PROMIS 体力功能结果的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Feb 15;45(4):E236-E243. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003236.
6
Predicting EuroQol (EQ-5D) scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items and domain item banks in a United States sample.在美国样本中,根据患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)的总体项目和领域项目库预测欧洲五维度健康量表(EQ-5D)得分。
Qual Life Res. 2009 Aug;18(6):783-91. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9489-8. Epub 2009 May 27.
7
A pilot study of patient-centered outcome assessment using PROMIS for patients undergoing colorectal surgery.采用 PROMIS 对行结直肠手术患者进行以患者为中心的结局评估的初步研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Oct;25(10):3103-3112. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3718-4. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
8
Sensitivity of alternative measures of functioning and wellbeing for adults with sickle cell disease: comparison of PROMIS® to ASCQ-Me℠.镰状细胞病成人功能和幸福感替代测量方法的敏感性:PROMIS®与ASCQ-Me℠的比较
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Jun 2;15(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0661-5.
9
Do You Recall?: Results From a Within-Person Recall Study of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form v2.0 - Physical Function 8c.您是否记得?:患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)简表 v2.0 - 身体机能 8c 个体内回忆研究结果。
Value Health. 2022 Feb;25(2):161-166. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.08.011. Epub 2021 Oct 3.
10
SRS-22r legacy scores can be accurately translated to PROMIS scores in adult spinal deformity patients.SRS-22r 旧版评分可以准确地转换为成年脊柱畸形患者的 PROMIS 评分。
Spine J. 2020 Feb;20(2):234-240. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.09.006. Epub 2019 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
A Content Framework of a Novel Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Detecting Early Adverse Events After Major Abdominal Surgery.一种新型的患者报告结局测量工具的内容框架,用于检测腹部大手术后的早期不良事件。
World J Surg. 2023 Nov;47(11):2676-2687. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-07143-w. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
2
Patient-reported outcome measures to evaluate postoperative quality of life in patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery: a systematic review.评价择期腹部手术患者术后生活质量的患者报告结局测量指标:系统评价。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Aug;31(8):2267-2279. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-03071-1. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
3
Mobile Phone-Based Measures of Activity, Step Count, and Gait Speed: Results From a Study of Older Ambulatory Adults in a Naturalistic Setting.

本文引用的文献

1
Relationship between deficits in overall quality of life and non-small-cell lung cancer survival.整体生活质量缺陷与非小细胞肺癌生存之间的关系。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 1;30(13):1498-504. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.4631. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
2
Quality of life in patients with pancreatic cancer.胰腺癌患者的生活质量
JOP. 2012 Mar 10;13(2):182-4.
3
Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.前瞻性随机对照试验的中期结果:传统四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较。
基于手机的活动、步数及步速测量:一项针对自然环境中老年人动态活动的研究结果
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Oct 3;5(10):e104. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.5090.
4
American Society for Enhanced Recovery (ASER) and Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) Joint Consensus Statement on Optimal Analgesia within an Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Colorectal Surgery: Part 2-From PACU to the Transition Home.美国加速康复学会(ASER)与围手术期质量改进组织(POQI)关于结直肠手术加速康复路径中最佳镇痛的联合共识声明:第2部分——从麻醉后恢复室到出院过渡阶段
Perioper Med (Lond). 2017 Apr 13;6:7. doi: 10.1186/s13741-017-0063-6. eCollection 2017.
5
A Double-Blinded Randomized Trial to Compare the Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Procedures Using Patient-Reported Outcomes.一项使用患者报告结局比较微创手术有效性的双盲随机试验。
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Jul;221(1):111-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.02.022. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
Surg Endosc. 2012 May;26(5):1296-303. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2028-z. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
4
Randomized clinical trial of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.随机对照临床试验:经脐单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较
Br J Surg. 2011 Dec;98(12):1695-702. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7689. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
5
The association of quality-of-life measures with malignancy and survival in patients with pancreatic pathology.胰腺疾病患者生活质量评估与恶性肿瘤及生存的相关性。
Pancreas. 2011 Oct;40(7):1063-9. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e31821ad8eb.
6
Laparo-endoscopic single site cholecystectomy versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a pilot randomized trial.腹腔镜单部位胆囊切除术与标准腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较:一项初步随机试验的结果。
Am J Surg. 2011 Jul;202(1):45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.06.019. Epub 2011 May 19.
7
Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.随机对照试验比较单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术。
Ann Surg. 2011 Jul;254(1):22-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182192f89.
8
Long-term follow-up and individual item analysis of quality of life assessments related to laparoscopic-assisted colectomy in the COST trial 93-46-53 (INT 0146).COST 试验 93-46-53(INT 0146)中腹腔镜辅助结肠切除术相关生活质量评估的长期随访和单项分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Sep;18(9):2422-31. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1650-2. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
9
Prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: report of preliminary data.前瞻性随机对照试验研究传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术与单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:初步数据报告。
Am J Surg. 2011 Mar;201(3):369-72; discussion 372-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.09.012.
10
Patient satisfaction, chronic pain, and quality of life after elective incisional hernia repair: effects of recurrence and repair technique.择期切口疝修补术后患者满意度、慢性疼痛和生活质量:复发和修补技术的影响。
Hernia. 2011 Apr;15(2):123-9. doi: 10.1007/s10029-010-0750-4. Epub 2010 Nov 12.