Kruyt Jan W, van Heijst GertJan F, Altshuler Douglas L, Lentink David
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Experimental Zoology Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Applied Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
J R Soc Interface. 2015 Apr 6;12(105). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2015.0051.
Airplanes and helicopters use high aspect ratio wings to reduce the power required to fly, but must operate at low angle of attack to prevent flow separation and stall. Animals capable of slow sustained flight, such as hummingbirds, have low aspect ratio wings and flap their wings at high angle of attack without stalling. Instead, they generate an attached vortex along the leading edge of the wing that elevates lift. Previous studies have demonstrated that this vortex and high lift can be reproduced by revolving the animal wing at the same angle of attack. How do flapping and revolving animal wings delay stall and reduce power? It has been hypothesized that stall delay derives from having a short radial distance between the shoulder joint and wing tip, measured in chord lengths. This non-dimensional measure of wing length represents the relative magnitude of inertial forces versus rotational accelerations operating in the boundary layer of revolving and flapping wings. Here we show for a suite of aspect ratios, which represent both animal and aircraft wings, that the attachment of the leading edge vortex on a revolving wing is determined by wing aspect ratio, defined with respect to the centre of revolution. At high angle of attack, the vortex remains attached when the local radius is shorter than four chord lengths and separates outboard on higher aspect ratio wings. This radial stall limit explains why revolving high aspect ratio wings (of helicopters) require less power compared with low aspect ratio wings (of hummingbirds) at low angle of attack and vice versa at high angle of attack.
飞机和直升机采用大展弦比机翼来降低飞行所需功率,但必须在小攻角下运行以防止气流分离和失速。能够进行缓慢持续飞行的动物,如蜂鸟,具有小展弦比机翼,并以大攻角拍打翅膀而不会失速。相反,它们会在机翼前缘产生一个附着涡,从而提高升力。先前的研究表明,通过以相同攻角旋转动物翅膀可以重现这种涡和高升力。拍打和旋转的动物翅膀是如何延迟失速并降低功率的呢?据推测,失速延迟源于肩关节与翼尖之间的径向距离较短(以弦长衡量)。这种机翼长度的无量纲度量代表了在旋转和拍打翅膀的边界层中惯性力与旋转加速度的相对大小。在这里,我们针对一系列代表动物和飞机机翼的展弦比表明,旋转机翼上的前缘涡附着情况由相对于旋转中心定义的机翼展弦比决定。在大攻角下,当局部半径小于四个弦长时,涡会保持附着,而在大展弦比机翼上会在外侧分离。这种径向失速极限解释了为什么在小攻角下,旋转的大展弦比机翼(直升机的)比小展弦比机翼(蜂鸟的)需要的功率更少,而在大攻角下情况则相反。