Capra Gian Franco, Ganga Antonio, Buondonno Andrea, Grilli Eleonora, Gaviano Carla, Vacca Sergio
Dipartimento di Architettura, Design e Urbanistica, Università degli Studi di Sassari, Via Colombo n° 1, Nuoro, Italy.
Dipartimento di Architettura e Disegno Industriale "Luigi Vanvitelli", Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli, Abazia San Lorenzo ad Septimum, Borgo San Lorenzo, Aversa (Caserta), Italy.
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 19;10(3):e0120240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120240. eCollection 2015.
In taking an integrated ethnopedological approach, this study aims to investigate the meaning of the distribution of the toponyms used in traditional and recent cartography of Sardinia (southern Italy). It is particularly, but not only, focused on those related to soil resources. Sardinia is particularly interesting in this respect, as its unique history, geography, and linguistic position makes it one of the Italian and Mediterranean regions with the greatest number of toponyms. This research investigated the toponyms belonging to an important sub-region of Sardinia, called Ogliastra (central-eastern Sardinia). The research was conducted through the following integrated approach: i) toponymy research and collection from different sources; ii) database creation and translation of toponyms from the Sardinian language (SL); iii) categorization of toponyms; and iv) graphical, statistical, and cartographic data processing. Distribution and diversity of toponyms were assessed using the compiled database, coupled with a geographical information system (GIS). Of around 7700 toponyms collected, 79% had already been reported in SL, while just 21% were in Italian. Of the toponyms in SL, 77% are of known meaning and 54% of these toponyms were characterized by a meaning directly and/or indirectly connected to specific environmental features. On the whole, morphology would appear to be the primary environmental factor able to explain the complex, articulated presence, distribution, and typology of the investigated toponyms. A least squares regression analysis of pedodiversity vs. topodiversity shows a very closed distribution, with an impressive high correlation index (R2 = 0.824). The principal factor analysis (PFA) shows that such a connection may be morphologically based, thereby confirming that pedodiversity and topodiversity are strongly linked each other. Overall, the research shows that an integrated ethnopedological approach, combining indigenous and scientific knowledge may be of great interest in order to mitigate the impressive phenomena of the indigenous knowledge lost.
本研究采用综合民族土壤学方法,旨在探究撒丁岛(意大利南部)传统地图和近期地图中使用的地名分布的意义。研究特别关注但不限于与土壤资源相关的地名。在这方面,撒丁岛特别有趣,因为其独特的历史、地理和语言地位使其成为意大利和地中海地区地名数量最多的地区之一。本研究调查了撒丁岛一个重要次区域奥利亚斯特拉(撒丁岛中东部)的地名。研究通过以下综合方法进行:i)从不同来源进行地名研究和收集;ii)创建数据库并将地名从撒丁岛语(SL)翻译过来;iii)对地名进行分类;iv)进行图形、统计和制图数据处理。利用汇编的数据库以及地理信息系统(GIS)评估地名的分布和多样性。在收集的约7700个地名中,79%已在撒丁岛语中有所记载,而只有21%是意大利语地名。在撒丁岛语地名中,77%的含义已知,其中54%的地名含义直接和/或间接与特定环境特征相关。总体而言,地貌形态似乎是能够解释所研究地名的复杂、清晰的存在、分布和类型的主要环境因素。土壤多样性与地名多样性的最小二乘回归分析显示出非常紧密的分布,相关指数高得惊人(R2 = 0.824)。主成分分析(PFA)表明,这种联系可能基于地貌形态,从而证实土壤多样性和地名多样性彼此紧密相连。总体而言,研究表明,结合本土知识和科学知识的综合民族土壤学方法可能对于减轻本土知识流失这一惊人现象非常有意义。