Maslov Mikhail Y, Wei Abraham E, Pezone Matthew J, Edelman Elazer R, Lovich Mark A
Tufts University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, 02135, USA.
Tufts University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, 02135, USA.
Heart Lung Circ. 2015 Sep;24(9):912-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2015.02.012. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
While epinephrine infusion is widely used in critical care for inotropic support, there is no direct method to detect the onset and measure the magnitude of this response. We hypothesised that surrogate measurements, such as heart rate and vascular tone, may indicate if the plasma and tissue concentrations of epinephrine and cAMP are in a range sufficient to increase myocardial contractility.
Cardiovascular responses to epinephrine infusion (0.05-0.5 mcgkg(-1)min(-1)) were measured in rats using arterial and left ventricular catheters. Epinephrine and cAMP levels were measured using ELISA techniques.
The lowest dose of epinephrine infusion (0.05 mcgkg(-1)min(-1)) did not raise plasma epinephrine levels and did not lead to cardiovascular response. Incremental increase in epinephrine infusion (0.1 mcgkg(-1)min(-1)) elevated plasma but not myocardial epinephrine levels, providing vascular, but not cardiac effects. Further increase in the infusion rate (0.2 mcgkg(-1)min(-1)) raised myocardial tissue epinephrine levels sufficient to increase heart rate but not contractility. Inotropic and lusitropic effects were significant at the infusion rate of 0.3 mcgkg(-1)min(-1). Correlation of plasma epinephrine to haemodynamic parameters suggest that as plasma concentration increases, systemic vascular resistance falls (EC50=47 pg/ml), then HR increases (ED50=168 pg/ml), followed by a rise in contractility and lusitropy (ED50=346 pg/ml and ED50=324 pg/ml accordingly).
The dose response of epinephrine is distinct for vascular tone, HR and contractility. The need for higher doses to see cardiac effects is likely due to the threshold for drug accumulation in tissue. Successful inotropic support with epinephrine cannot be achieved unless the infusion is sufficient to raise the heart rate.
虽然肾上腺素输注在重症监护中广泛用于正性肌力支持,但尚无直接方法来检测这种反应的起始并测量其强度。我们假设诸如心率和血管张力等替代测量方法可能表明肾上腺素和环磷酸腺苷(cAMP)的血浆及组织浓度是否处于足以增加心肌收缩力的范围内。
使用动脉和左心室导管在大鼠中测量对肾上腺素输注(0.05 - 0.5微克/千克(-1)分钟(-1))的心血管反应。使用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)技术测量肾上腺素和cAMP水平。
最低剂量的肾上腺素输注(0.05微克/千克(-1)分钟(-1))未提高血浆肾上腺素水平,也未导致心血管反应。肾上腺素输注量递增(0.1微克/千克(-1)分钟(-1))提高了血浆但未提高心肌肾上腺素水平,产生了血管效应而非心脏效应。输注速率进一步增加(0.2微克/千克(-1)分钟(-1))使心肌组织肾上腺素水平升高到足以增加心率但不足以增加收缩力的程度。在输注速率为0.3微克/千克(-1)分钟(-1)时,正性肌力和变时性效应显著。血浆肾上腺素与血流动力学参数的相关性表明,随着血浆浓度增加,全身血管阻力下降(半数有效浓度(EC50) = 47皮克/毫升),然后心率增加(半数有效剂量(ED50) = 168皮克/毫升),随后收缩力和舒张性增强(相应的ED50分别为346皮克/毫升和324皮克/毫升)。
肾上腺素对血管张力、心率和收缩力的剂量反应各不相同。需要更高剂量才能看到心脏效应可能是由于药物在组织中积累的阈值所致。除非输注足以提高心率,否则无法通过肾上腺素成功实现正性肌力支持。